Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Turnabee lets you assign plans and tasks to family, caregivers, babysitters or coworkers, and sends them straight into the calendar already on their phone (Google or Apple). Recipients need no app, account or login. Free plan notifies up to 3 people; no credit card needed.

Growth

Real problem, specific wedge: recipients need zero app, account, or login. Calendar-native delivery is genuinely differentiated. Early stage (domain 0.1 years old).

Screenshots

1 / 1

Turnabee

About this app

Key features

1Calendar-native delivery: recipients subscribe once and events appear in their existing Google or Apple calendar — no app, account, or login required
2AI notice parsing: paste, speak, or photograph a school notice and Turnabee turns it into tasks you review before anything is added
3Tiered pricing from free (3 people, no card) to Plus ($8.99/mo, 30 people, unlimited groups, 300 AI notices/month)

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Busy parents

Pain points

Coordinating school notices, pickups, and activities with partner and kids

Primary needs

A simple way to share schedules without forcing family to use a new app

Demographic

Caregivers for elderly parents

Pain points

Remembering medical appointments, bill due dates, and home maintenance tasks

Primary needs

Effortless task sharing with elderly parents who are not tech-savvy

Demographic

Professionals managing teams or freelancers

Pain points

Ensuring colleagues or contractors remember deadlines without constant follow-ups

Primary needs

A passive way to push tasks to others' calendars without adoption barriers

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Turnabee solves a problem that anyone who's tried to share a calendar with a non-tech-savvy parent or a babysitter will recognize instantly: the other person has to install something, sign up for something, or learn something. Turnabee's answer is to skip all of that — the recipient subscribes once and events appear in the calendar they already use. The free plan is genuinely free (3 people, no card), the pricing scales sensibly ($4.99 for 10 people, $8.99 for 30), and the AI notice-parsing feature is a clever hook for parents drowning in school paperwork. The site is clean, fast on desktop, and the guides page shows real thought about who's actually using this. The rough edges are real but fixable: mobile LCP at 4.2 seconds, three accessibility audit failures, 'Coming soon' badges that make a working product look unfinished, and no published security audits. It's early — the domain is three months old — but the idea is sharper than most family-coordination apps, which tend to just rebuild the shared calendar with a nicer UI. Turnabee's insight is that the recipient is the hard part, and it's built the whole product around that.

Measure by measure

Usability

Sign-in options are clear and above the fold. Free plan lets you test the full flow without a card. Guides cover real scenarios but the homepage buries CTAs in paragraphs.

Design

Clean hero with strong hierarchy and a tangible phone mockup showing the core promise. Three 'Coming soon' badges and repetitive copy undercut the polish.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 97/100 is excellent. Mobile 81/100 with LCP 4.2s is solid but the 4.2s largest paint is the weak spot on slower connections.

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and full email auth (SPF/DMARC). Missing Permissions-Policy header. No published audits or bug bounty found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse 93/100 with three failing audits: contrast ratio, missing main landmark, and label-name mismatches. Multi-language support (EN/ZH/JA) is a real plus.

Growth

Real problem, specific wedge: recipients need zero app, account, or login. Calendar-native delivery is genuinely differentiated. Early stage (domain 0.1 years old).

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: LCP 4.2s is the weak spot; desktop is 97/100 but phones are where parents actually check schedules
Accessibility: three Lighthouse failures (contrast, main landmark, label-name mismatch) are fixable and would push the score into the high 90s
Trust signals: no SOC 2, ISO, pen-test results, or bug bounty published — matters for a product handling family and elder-care schedules

Design & Usability

Turnabee's homepage does the hard part well: it explains a genuinely confusing concept (calendar delivery without recipient accounts) in about ten seconds. The hero is clean, the phone mockup shows exactly what lands in someone's calendar, and the sign-in options are unmissable. Where it stumbles is in the middle — three 'Coming soon' badges on the platform row make the product feel unfinished even though the web app works now, and the 'no app, no account' claim gets repeated in slightly different words across multiple paragraphs. The guides page is a smart addition: three specific how-tos for babysitters, sibling care coordination, and the iPhone subscribed-calendar alert bug. That last one is a real problem people search for, and owning it is good SEO. The free plan is genuinely free (3 people, no card), which removes the biggest friction point in testing whether this works for your family.

Speed & Security

Speed is a tale of two devices. Desktop Lighthouse hits 97/100 — genuinely fast. Mobile sits at 81/100 with a 4.2-second largest contentful paint, which is the number that matters when a parent is checking their phone in a school pickup line. CLS is zero and TBT is zero, so the page doesn't jump or stutter once it loads; it just takes a beat to get there. Security is solid for the stage: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, SPF, and DMARC all present. The one missing header is Permissions-Policy, which is minor. What's absent is the stuff that costs money and time: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no published pen-test results, no bug bounty. For a product handling family schedules and elderly care appointments, those will matter as it grows. Right now it's a clean, well-configured indie app with no red flags and no gold stars.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 93/100 on Lighthouse, which sounds excellent until you read the three failing audits: insufficient color contrast, a missing main landmark, and visible text labels that don't match their accessible names. Those are fixable in an afternoon and would push the score into the high 90s. The multi-language support (English, Chinese, Japanese) is a genuine strength — most indie tools don't bother. Growth potential is the interesting one. The problem Turnabee names is real: shared calendars require both people to have accounts and learn a new tool, which is exactly why your parents never accepted that Google Calendar invite. The wedge — recipients subscribe once and never open Turnabee again — is specific and defensible. The AI notice-parsing feature (paste a school notice, get tasks) is a smart hook for the exact customer who's drowning in paper. The limit is adoption: you're asking the organiser to change their workflow, and Google Calendar is free and already on everyone's phone. Turnabee's bet is that the recipient-side friction is worth paying to remove. That's a real bet, but it's a bet.

Conclusion

If you're the person in your family who ends up texting 'did you see the school email?' three times a week, Turnabee is worth the free plan test. Set up one recurring thing — a pickup, a medication reminder, a bill due date — and see if it actually lands in the other person's calendar without a follow-up text. That's the whole product in one experiment. If it works, $4.99 a month is cheaper than the mental overhead of being everyone's reminder system. If it doesn't, you've lost twenty minutes and learned something about your family's calendar habits. The product has real rough edges — mobile speed, accessibility gaps, no security certifications — but none of them are dealbreakers for the use case it's targeting. The bigger question is whether the organiser-side workflow is smooth enough to replace the group chat. That's the bet, and it's a reasonable one.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the three Lighthouse accessibility failures: color contrast, add a main landmark, and match visible labels to accessible names.
Improve mobile LCP from 4.2s — compress hero images, preload critical assets, and consider serving a lighter mobile layout.
Replace the three 'Coming soon' platform badges with a single 'Web app available now' message to stop undercutting the working product.
Add a security page or trust center with your data handling practices, even if you don't have SOC 2 yet — transparency builds trust for family data.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Turnabee	Google Calendar	Cozi Family Organizer	Apple Calendar
Recipient account required	No — recipients subscribe once, no app or account needed	Yes — both parties need Google accounts	Yes — all members must install and use the app	Yes — both users need Apple IDs and must accept invites
Free tier available	Yes — 3 people, no card required, not a trial	Yes — free with Google account	Yes — free tier with ads and limited features	Yes — free with Apple ID
AI notice parsing (paste/photo to tasks)	Yes — 10 free, 100/mo Basic, 300/mo Plus	No	No	No
Works with existing phone calendar	Yes — delivers to Google/Apple calendar already on recipient's phone	Yes — but requires Google Calendar app/account	No — uses its own in-app calendar	Yes — but requires Apple Calendar/iCloud
Multi-language support	Yes — English, Chinese, Japanese	Yes — many languages	English only	Yes — many languages
Pricing (paid tier)	$4.99/mo Basic (10 people), $8.99/mo Plus (30 people)	Free (Google Workspace from $6/user/mo)	Cozi Gold ~$39/year	Free (iCloud+ from $0.99/mo for storage)