Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Compare ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and 100+ AI models side by side in one app.

Security

HTTPS and SPF are in place, but HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and DMARC are all missing — 3/12 checklist points. No compliance or audit claims found.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Admix

About this app

Admix is an AI aggregator that puts ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi and 100+ other frontier models in one app. Send one prompt to several models, read the answers side by side, find consensus and cross-check hallucinations, and switch models mid-conversation. It also supports multi-model image generation. Paid subscription: Plus $8.99/mo, Premier $50/mo, with a $1.99 7-day trial. There is no free plan. Founded August 2024 by Alireza Bashiri (solo, bootstrapped).

Key features

1Send one prompt to multiple frontier models (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi, 100+) and compare answers side by side.
2Switch models mid-conversation and cross-check outputs to spot hallucinations and find consensus.
3Multi-model image generation and a single subscription starting at $8.99/mo with a $1.99 7-day trial.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

AI researchers and power users

Pain points

Paying for multiple AI subscriptions and manually comparing outputs

Primary needs

A single platform to test and compare responses from various AI models

Demographic

Software developers and engineers

Pain points

Needing to switch between different AI tools for coding, debugging, and documentation

Primary needs

Access to specialized models like Claude for coding and GPT-5 for reasoning in one place

Demographic

Content creators and marketers

Pain points

Uncertainty about which AI generates the best copy, images, or ideas

Primary needs

Quick side-by-side comparison of AI-generated content to pick the best version

Demographic

Budget-conscious students and hobbyists

Pain points

High cost of several individual AI subscriptions

Primary needs

Affordable access to multiple AI models in one subscription instead of several separate ones

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Admix is a competent multi-model AI aggregator with a polished landing page and a genuinely useful core idea: one subscription, many frontier models, side-by-side comparison. The design is above average, accessibility scores perfectly on automated checks, and the pricing is aggressive. But the product stumbles on speed (10.4s mobile LCP), security hygiene (3/12 headers), and messaging consistency (free plan contradiction). Against Poe and ChatHub, Admix needs a sharper wedge than 'we also aggregate models.' The $1.99 trial is a smart low-friction entry, but the lack of a free tier and public docs makes it harder to build trust with the power users it targets.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear CTA and trial pricing, but the homepage contradicts itself on a free plan, and no docs, help center, or demo surfaced. Onboarding depth is unverified.

Design

Polished modal-led landing page with strong hierarchy, a product preview, and social proof. Sidebar contrast and tiny pricing footnote hold it back from excellent.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 47/100 with a brutal 10.4s LCP and 7.9s FCP; desktop fares better at 71/100. The JS-gated SPA is heavy on mobile.

Security

HTTPS and SPF are in place, but HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and DMARC are all missing — 3/12 checklist points. No compliance or audit claims found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility scored a perfect 100/100 on automated checks. No a11y statement or WCAG claim, and JS-gated app limits manual verification.

Growth

Real problem — subscription fatigue and model comparison are genuine pain points — but Poe and ChatHub already own this space, and Admix's wedge is thin.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 10.4s LCP and 47/100 Lighthouse score need urgent optimization.
Security headers: missing HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and DMARC; only 3/12 checklist points.
Messaging consistency: homepage claims a free plan while app details say there is none.
No public docs, help center, or interactive demo to build trust before the paid trial.

Design & Usability

Admix's landing page is genuinely well-crafted: a centered modal with a clear headline, a product preview showing the chat interface, and social proof in the form of a 4.9/5 rating and '700+ users.' The visual hierarchy is strong and the CTA is unmissable. But usability is where the cracks show. The homepage claims a 'free plan to start' while the app details state there is no free plan — a contradiction that erodes trust before signup. The app is JavaScript-gated with no visible documentation, help center, or live demo in the fetched content. For a product targeting power users who want to compare models, the absence of a public demo or docs is a real gap. The trial at $1.99 for 7 days is a reasonable low-friction entry, but the messaging needs to be consistent.

Speed & Security

Speed is the weakest measured dimension. Lighthouse mobile performance sits at 47/100 with an LCP of 10.4 seconds and FCP of 7.9 seconds — that is painfully slow for a landing page, let alone an app. Desktop scores 71/100, suggesting the mobile experience is disproportionately heavy. For a product whose value proposition is 'save time comparing models,' a 10-second load is a bad first impression. Security is similarly thin: HTTPS is enforced and SPF is present, but HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy are all absent, and DMARC is missing. The 3/12 checklist score reflects a basic setup with no published compliance, audit, or bug bounty program. For a paid subscription handling user prompts and potentially sensitive data, this is below what users should expect.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is the strongest measured dimension: Lighthouse scored 100/100 on automated axe-core checks, which is excellent for a small product. However, automated checks cover only part of WCAG, and there is no accessibility statement, WCAG conformance claim, or multi-language support mentioned. The JavaScript-gated app also raises questions about keyboard and screen reader support that automated tools cannot fully answer. Growth potential is moderate. The problem Admix names — subscription fatigue and the need to compare model outputs — is real and growing. But the space is crowded: Poe by Quora offers multi-model chat with a massive existing user base, and ChatHub is a lightweight browser extension that does side-by-side comparison without a subscription. Admix's differentiators — mid-conversation model switching and multi-model image generation — are useful but not defensible moats. The $8.99/mo price is competitive, but without a free tier and with thin differentiation, growth will depend on execution and marketing rather than structural advantage.

Conclusion

Admix is worth a look if you are already paying for multiple AI subscriptions and want a cheaper consolidated option with a real comparison workflow. The 7-day trial at $1.99 is low-risk. But go in with eyes open: the mobile site is slow, the security posture is basic, and the free-plan messaging is inconsistent. If the team tightens performance, ships proper security headers, and publishes real documentation, this could become a strong contender in the aggregation space. For now, it is a promising but unpolished alternative to Poe and ChatHub.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the mobile performance: 10.4s LCP is unacceptable. Optimize images, defer non-critical JS, and consider server-side rendering for the landing page.
Add HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and DMARC headers. Publish a security page with data handling details to build trust for a paid product.
Resolve the free-plan contradiction between the homepage and app details. Pick one message and make it consistent everywhere.
Ship a public demo or interactive comparison view so users can see the core value before committing to a trial.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Admix	Poe	ChatHub
Multi-model chat aggregation	Yes — 100+ models including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Kimi	Yes — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and many community bots	Yes — ChatGPT, Claude, Bard and others via browser extension
Side-by-side comparison view	Yes — core feature, compare answers side by side	Limited — primarily single-bot chat, no native side-by-side	Yes — core feature, compare responses side by side
Free tier available	No — paid only, $1.99 7-day trial (homepage contradicts this)	Yes — free tier with limited daily messages	Yes — free browser extension with optional paid API keys
Pricing model	Plus $8.99/mo, Premier $50/mo, $1.99 7-day trial	Free tier + subscription (~$19.99/mo) for higher limits	Free extension; users pay per API key or subscription
Platform / installation	Web app (JavaScript required)	Web, iOS, Android, macOS	Browser extension (Chrome, Edge, Firefox)
Multi-model image generation	Yes — supported	Yes — via image-capable bots	Limited — depends on underlying model APIs