Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Fusillade uses AI to help law enforcement capture firearm evidence, read serial numbers and markings, and connect records across partner agencies.

Usability

Clear demo-request path repeated three times and a product walkthrough video, but no self-serve trial, thin public docs, and an unlabeled map that hides its own numbers.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Fusillade

About this app

Fusillade is an AI-powered firearm evidence platform for law enforcement. Officers photograph recovered firearms in the mobile app, then review extracted serial numbers, make, model, and identifying markings alongside the original images. The platform turns those details into searchable records, helping investigators find connections across the records their agency is authorized to access. For privately made or defaced firearms, Fusillade documents visible markings and physical characteristics that can support an investigation when a serial number is missing or unreadable. Agency-controlled sharing lets partners collaborate while retaining control over access to their evidence. Audit logs record evidence access and searches. Fusillade brings field capture, evidence review, and cross-agency search into one workflow, helping officers and analysts turn a recovered firearm into an investigative lead.

Key features

1Mobile field capture: photograph a recovered firearm and review extracted serial, make, model, and markings beside the original image.
2PMF and defaced-firearm documentation: capture visible markings, materials, and build characteristics when no serial exists.
3Cross-agency search with agency-controlled sharing and audit logs recording evidence access and searches.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Law enforcement investigators and detectives

Pain points

Manual data entry, fragmented records, difficulty tracing firearms

Primary needs

Quick evidence capture, reliable data extraction, cross-referencing capabilities

Demographic

Crime lab technicians and forensic specialists

Pain points

Time-consuming documentation, risk of transcription errors

Primary needs

Accurate digital records, photo verification, secure data storage

Demographic

Agency administrators and policymakers

Pain points

Lack of real-time insights, limited inter-agency collaboration

Primary needs

Analytics on firearm traces, scalable platform, compliance with privacy policies

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Fusillade is a credible, well-presented early-stage entrant in law-enforcement evidence software. The site is polished and on-subject, security headers are strong, and the PMF/defaced-firearm angle is a real differentiator against generic digital evidence platforms. The weaknesses are the ones that matter for this buyer: no self-serve trial or public docs, illustrative-only product visuals, a mobile LCP of 4.2s, missing DMARC, and no published compliance certifications. For an agency evaluating it, the demo is the whole story — and the compliance paperwork will be the deciding factor.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear demo-request path repeated three times and a product walkthrough video, but no self-serve trial, thin public docs, and an unlabeled map that hides its own numbers.

Design

Dark, disciplined palette with one blue CTA and a genuinely on-subject interactive firearm hero. Held back by low-contrast grey captions and mockups standing in for real UI.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 100/100 and mobile 86/100 with CLS 0 and TBT 4ms, but mobile LCP 4.2s drags past the 2.5s good threshold — likely the heavy hero render.

Security

Strong header hygiene — HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Permissions-Policy all set, 11/12 checklist — but DMARC is missing and no SOC 2, ISO, or pen-test page is published for a law-enforcement evidence product.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 98/100 with one heading-order failure, but low-contrast grey captions and no published WCAG statement keep it short of excellent.

Growth

Specific, funded buyer (LE agencies), a real wedge in PMF/defaced-firearm documentation and cross-agency search, but govtech procurement and Axon's gravity cap how fast it spreads.

Improvement areas

No self-serve trial, sandbox, or public documentation — evaluation requires a sales demo.
No published SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test, or bug-bounty page; DMARC not configured.
Homepage uses illustrative mockups instead of real product screenshots; mobile LCP 4.2s.

Design & Usability

Fusillade's homepage is a cut above typical govtech: a dark, restrained palette, one saturated blue CTA repeated in nav, hero, and close, and an interactive firearm render with hotspots that actually fits the subject. The problem is that every product visual is stamped 'illustrative' — there's no real screenshot of the capture or review flow, so the workflow you're buying stays abstract. Usability is demo-gated: three 'Request a demo' buttons, a walkthrough video, and no self-serve trial or public docs. The map section is the weakest link — 20 cities in an unstyled native dropdown and glowing hotspots with no readable labels.

Speed & Security

Speed is a tale of two devices: desktop Lighthouse 100/100 with CLS 0 and TBT 4ms, mobile 86/100 but LCP 4.2s — past the 2.5s good threshold, almost certainly the heavy hero render. For a field-capture tool used on department hardware, that mobile number matters more than the desktop trophy. Security is the strongest measured dimension: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy all present, 11/12 on the header checklist. The gaps are DMARC (not detected) and the absence of any published SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test, or bug-bounty page — a notable omission for a platform holding firearm evidence and audit logs.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 98/100 on Lighthouse with a single heading-order failure, but the visual audit flags small, low-contrast grey captions and footer legal text on near-black — the disclaimers that matter most for trust are the hardest to read. No WCAG statement or multi-language support is published. Growth is a judgment on the idea: Fusillade targets a specific, funded buyer (LE investigators, crime lab techs, agency admins) and carves a real wedge in privately made and defaced firearm documentation plus cross-agency search with agency-controlled sharing — a genuine gap versus generic DEMS. The ceiling is structural: govtech procurement is slow and Axon Evidence.com already owns the evidence locker.

Conclusion

Fusillade is worth a demo if your agency handles PMFs or struggles with cross-jurisdiction firearm tracing — the workflow it describes is genuinely underserved. But go in with a compliance checklist: ask for SOC 2 status, data-residency and retention terms, DMARC/email-spoofing posture, and a real (not illustrative) walkthrough of capture-to-search. The product's promise is strong; the proof still lives behind a demo form.

Suggestions for improvement

Replace at least one 'illustrative' mockup with a real, redacted screenshot of the capture and review flow.
Publish a security/compliance page: SOC 2 status, data retention, DMARC, and subprocessor list.
Fix mobile LCP (4.2s) by compressing or lazy-loading the hero render.
Add a self-serve sandbox or interactive product tour so evaluators can see the workflow without a sales call.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Fusillade	ShotSpotter	Evidence.com (Axon)
Primary function	AI firearm evidence capture, review, and cross-agency search	Gunshot detection and acoustic alerting	General digital evidence management (body cam, media, case files)
Firearm-specific serial/marking extraction	Yes — AI-extracted serial, make, model, and markings with photo verification	No	No — general media storage, not firearm-specific extraction
Privately made / defaced firearm documentation	Yes — markings, materials, build characteristics, component details	No	No dedicated PMF workflow
Cross-agency sharing with access control	Yes — agency-controlled sharing with audit logs	Alerts shared with partner agencies; not evidence records	Yes — mature multi-agency sharing and permissions
Public compliance certifications	Not published in collected evidence	Established vendor with public compliance posture	Mature compliance program (SOC 2, FedRAMP-adjacent)