Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Grade ERP helps IT companies and digital agencies manage projects, HR, recruiting, and finances in one place. Gain real-time insights.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse score of 93 is strong, but mobile collapses to 55 with a 16.2s LCP and 6.6s FCP. The embedded video elements are the likely culprit for the mobile gap.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Grade ERP

About this app

Grade ERP is an all-in-one business platform designed for IT companies, digital agencies, and tech teams. It brings together project management, HR, recruiting, and financial tools in a single system, helping businesses streamline operations and improve efficiency. Real-time dashboards allow users to track budgets, revenue, costs, cash flow, and profitability. Teams can automate workflows, manage employee data, publish vacancies, and coordinate tasks from one place. Grade ERP supports integration with tools like Slack, Google, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and Jira.

Key features

1All-in-one platform combining project management, HR, recruiting, sales, and finance in a single system.
2Real-time dashboards for tracking budgets, revenue, costs, cash flow, and profitability.
3Integrations with Slack, Google, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and Jira, plus a free tier with 1:1 consultation.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

IT companies and digital agencies

Primary needs

Manage projects, HR and finances in one place

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Grade ERP is a competent all-in-one business platform for IT companies and digital agencies, bundling project management, HR, recruiting, sales, and finance into one system. The homepage is polished and persona-driven, with clear role cards and a free tier that includes a 1:1 consultation. Pricing is transparent (Freemium, Core at €10/user/month, higher tiers), and integrations with Slack, Google, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and Jira are a practical touch. But the product has real gaps: mobile performance is poor (55/100, 16.2s LCP), security headers are incomplete (no HSTS, no CSP, HTTPS not enforced), and there's no SOC 2 or ISO claim for a tool handling payroll and invoices. Accessibility is strong on automated checks but fails on color contrast and unnamed links. Growth potential is moderate — the problem is real, but the category is crowded and the differentiation isn't sharp enough yet. A solid early-stage product with clear room to improve.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear persona-based feature mapping and a free tier with 1:1 consultation lower onboarding friction. No visible search or logged-in state, and the '1-2 day launch' claim is unverified.

Design

Coherent electric-blue branding and persona-mapped role cards give the site a professional, targeted feel. The crowded hero mockup and low-contrast stats bar hold it back from the top of the band.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse score of 93 is strong, but mobile collapses to 55 with a 16.2s LCP and 6.6s FCP. The embedded video elements are the likely culprit for the mobile gap.

Security

HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS, no CSP, and no Permissions-Policy — only 5/12 checklist points. SPF and DMARC are present, but no SOC 2, ISO, or pen-test claims were found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility score of 94/100 is strong, with five language options. Failing audits for color contrast and unnamed links, plus no WCAG statement, keep it mid-band.

Growth

A real problem — fragmented ops for digital agencies — with a specific niche and a genuine bundling wedge. The category is crowded, and the site doesn't yet prove why teams should switch from established tools.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 55/100 Lighthouse score with 16.2s LCP — embedded videos are the likely cause.
Security headers: HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS, no CSP, no Permissions-Policy; no SOC 2 or ISO claim.
Accessibility: failing color contrast and unnamed links; no WCAG statement or accessibility page.
Differentiation: site doesn't clearly explain why teams should switch from established alternatives.

Design & Usability

Grade ERP's homepage is a polished, persona-driven pitch. The electric-blue branding is consistent, and the nine role cards (Financial Manager, HR Manager, etc.) do a good job of showing who the product is for. The hero mockup is crowded — a laptop, a sticker, and floating UI elements all fighting for the same space — and the stats bar text is small and low-contrast on dark blue. On usability, the free tier with a 1:1 consultation is a smart onboarding hook, and the persona mapping helps users self-identify quickly. But there's no visible search or logged-in state, and the 'launch in 1-2 days' claim is unverified. The pricing page is clear with a monthly/yearly toggle, but the feature list is truncated and the higher tiers are opaque. Overall, a competent but not exceptional first impression.

Speed & Security

Speed is a tale of two devices. Desktop Lighthouse scores 93/100, which is genuinely good. Mobile collapses to 55/100 with a 16.2s LCP and 6.6s FCP — the embedded video elements are the likely culprit. For a business platform targeting teams on the go, that mobile gap is a real problem. Security is weaker than it should be for a product handling finances, HR, and payroll. HTTPS is not enforced, there's no HSTS, no CSP, and no Permissions-Policy — only 5/12 checklist points. SPF and DMARC are present, which is a baseline positive, but there's no SOC 2, ISO 27001, or pen-test claim anywhere on the site. For an ERP handling payroll and invoices, that's a gap that will matter to larger buyers.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores well on automated checks: 94/100 on Lighthouse, with five language options (English, Russian, Polish, Ukrainian, Kazakh). But the failing audits — insufficient color contrast and links without discernible names — are real issues that affect screen reader users. There's no accessibility statement or WCAG conformance claim, which is common for early-stage products but still a gap. Growth potential is moderate. Grade ERP targets a specific, real problem: digital agencies and IT companies juggling project management, HR, recruiting, and finance across disconnected tools. The bundling wedge is genuine, and the integrations (Slack, Google, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Jira) show awareness of existing workflows. But the category is crowded — Monday.com, ClickUp, and others already bundle some of this — and the site doesn't yet prove why a team should switch. The domain is two years old and only LinkedIn is listed as an official social profile, so traction is early. The idea has room, but the differentiation needs to be sharper.

Conclusion

Grade ERP is aiming at a real pain point: agencies and tech teams drowning in disconnected tools. The all-in-one pitch is coherent, the persona mapping is smart, and the free tier lowers the barrier to entry. But the execution has gaps that matter for its target buyer. Mobile performance is a genuine problem for a platform meant to be used on the go. Security headers are incomplete for a product that touches payroll and financial data. And the site doesn't yet make a compelling case for why a team should rip out Jira and QuickBooks to consolidate here. If Grade ERP tightens its mobile performance, publishes a security page with real compliance signals, and sharpens its differentiation against established players, it could carve out a real niche. For now, it's a promising but incomplete package — worth a look for small teams, but larger buyers will want more proof.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix mobile performance: the 16.2s LCP is likely caused by embedded video elements. Use lazy-loading, poster images, or replace autoplay video with static images on mobile.
Add security headers: enforce HTTPS, add HSTS, CSP, and Permissions-Policy. Publish a security page with SOC 2 or ISO 27001 status if available.
Improve accessibility: fix color contrast on the stats bar and add discernible names to links. Publish an accessibility statement with WCAG conformance level.
Sharpen differentiation: add a comparison page or case study showing why a team should switch from Jira + QuickBooks + HubSpot to Grade ERP, with concrete migration steps.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Grade ERP
Pricing model	Freemium (€0), Core (€10/user/month), higher tiers; yearly saves up to 20%	No alternative provided
Core functionality	Project management, HR, recruiting, sales, finance, time tracking, CRM	No alternative provided
Integrations	Slack, Google, HubSpot, QuickBooks, Jira	No alternative provided
Target audience	IT companies, digital agencies, tech teams	No alternative provided
Free tier / trial	Free Freemium plan with 1:1 consultation; paid plans offer free trial	No alternative provided
Security & compliance	HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS/CSP, no SOC 2 or ISO claim; SPF/DMARC present	No alternative provided