Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Free AI that answers your "Should I...?" questions with a clear yes or no

Security

Probe found HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS, CSP, frame protection, or security headers, and no SPF/DMARC. No compliance or audit claims anywhere on site.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Jev Knows

About this app

Jev Knows is a free AI decision helper for everyday "Should I...?" questions. Type a question like "Should I take the job offer?" and Jev gives a clear yes or no with a short, honest reason instead of a long list of pros and cons. It shows a yes/no lean as a percentage, breaks the decision into six factors (goal fit, downside, reversibility, timing, information, opportunity cost), and runs in the browser with no download. Free, no account needed, available in 8 languages.

Key features

1Yes/no verdict with a percentage lean and a short honest reason instead of a pros/cons list
2Six-factor breakdown: goal fit, downside, reversibility, timing, information, opportunity cost
3Iterative re-reads (up to five) with stacked results you can swipe back and compare
4Free, no account required, runs in the browser, available in 8 languages

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Jev Knows is a genuinely well-built little decision tool: fast, clean, and clear about what it does. The example output card does the heavy lifting, showing a YES/NO split with six weighted factors instead of a wall of pros and cons. Speed is excellent (96 mobile, 100 desktop). The weak spots are security (0/12 headers, no HTTPS enforcement, no DMARC) and thin feature-card copy. Growth potential is moderate — the idea is real and the six-factor framing is a genuine differentiator, but it's early and the moat is shallow. Worth a try; worth hardening before it asks anyone else about their life choices.

Measure by measure

Usability

Input is front and center with a pre-filled example, and the YES/NO verdict is instantly parseable. Language and Auto dropdowns add clutter to a one-question tool.

Design

Bold red/black typography and a dominant example output card make the value obvious fast. Feature cards read like placeholders and the bottom banner repeats the hero.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 96/100 (LCP 2.3s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms) and desktop 100/100. Snappy, static-feeling page with no layout shift.

Security

Probe found HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS, CSP, frame protection, or security headers, and no SPF/DMARC. No compliance or audit claims anywhere on site.

Accessibility

Lighthouse 96/100 with one contrast failure. Eight languages supported and a clean keyboard-friendly layout, but no published WCAG statement.

Growth

Real, specific problem (decision paralysis) with a clear wedge: one verdict plus a six-factor breakdown instead of a pros/cons essay. Free and accountless lowers friction, but the category is crowded with generic AI chat.

Improvement areas

Security headers entirely absent (0/12): no HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, CSP, or DMARC
Color contrast failure flagged by Lighthouse accessibility audit
Feature card copy reads like placeholders; bottom banner duplicates the hero
No published privacy policy depth, security page, or WCAG statement visible

Design & Usability

Jev Knows leads with a massive red-and-black headline and an example output card that shows exactly what you get: a big YES/NO split with six weighted factor bars. That's smart product marketing — you understand the tool before you type anything. The input is front and center with a pre-filled example question, so time-to-value is basically zero. Where it slips: the three numbered feature cards have descriptions so thin they read like placeholders, and the bottom red banner repeats the hero with a weaker CTA. The nav also carries language and 'Auto' dropdowns that add complexity to what should be a one-field tool. Solid, confident execution with a few unfinished edges.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout: Lighthouse mobile 96/100 with LCP 2.3s, CLS 0, and TBT 0ms, plus a perfect 100 on desktop. The page feels static and instant, which suits a single-input tool perfectly. Security is the opposite story. The HTTP probe found HTTPS not enforced, no HSTS, no CSP, no frame protection, no X-Content-Type-Options, no Referrer-Policy, and no SPF or DMARC records — 0/12 on the checklist. There's no security page, no compliance claim, no audit. For a free tool with no accounts and no stored data that's less catastrophic than it sounds, but the missing headers are a real, fixable gap that undermines trust for a product asking personal questions.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 96/100 on Lighthouse with a single failing audit: insufficient color contrast — predictable for a red-on-white brand and easy to fix. The site supports eight languages and has a clean, keyboard-navigable layout, though there's no published WCAG statement. Growth is a judgment call on the idea: 'Should I...?' is a real, universal question, and the six-factor breakdown (goal fit, downside, reversibility, timing, information, opportunity cost) gives it a concrete reason to exist beyond generic AI chat. Free and accountless lowers friction. But the category is crowded, the domain is three months old, and there's no visible moat — the wedge is the structured verdict, and that's copyable.

Conclusion

If you've ever stared at a 'Should I...?' question and wanted a straight answer with receipts, Jev Knows delivers that in about ten seconds with no signup. It won't replace your own judgment, and the security headers need work, but as a free, fast, structured second opinion it earns its place in your bookmarks. Fix the contrast, ship the headers, and flesh out those feature cards — the bones are good.

Suggestions for improvement

Enforce HTTPS and add HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy headers
Publish SPF and DMARC DNS records to prevent email spoofing of the jevknows.ai domain
Fix the color contrast failure flagged by Lighthouse — likely the red-on-white factor bars or CTA text
Replace the three placeholder-sounding feature card descriptions with concrete, specific copy

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Jev Knows
Pricing	Free, no account required	Not specified
Output format	Yes/No verdict with percentage lean plus six weighted factors	Not specified
Account required	No	Not specified
Languages supported	8	Not specified
Iterative re-reads	Up to 5, with stacked comparison	Not specified