Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Seriously proactive personal productivity app

Security

HTTPS and HSTS are in place, and the site makes real privacy claims (no training on your data, full deletion). But 4/12 on headers — no CSP, no frame protection, no Referrer-Policy — and no SPF or DMARC on the domain. No SOC 2 or ISO claim found.

Screenshots

1 / 5

Lemongraph

About this app

We noticed something about our own workdays. Almost every conversation ends with a promise. Keeping up with all of them slowly becomes a job of its own. What if personal task management took on that job? Picking up action items, watching signals and prioritizing the way you would. So we built Lemongraph to take that job off your plate. It picks up what you promised in meetings and email and lines it up in Up next. By the time you sit down your day is already sorted the way you'd sort it yourself. Some work you do over and over. The kind you'd happily hand to someone if you had someone. When Lemongraph spots one of those chores it shows up with a Hire button. Say yes once and next time it just asks for your OK. You won't find a chat box anywhere. You don't have to prompt it or explain yourself. It just learns your context and brings up what matters right when it matters. And it will never surprise you. Every action waits for your yes until you decide it doesn't have to.

Key features

1Pulls action items from Gmail, Google Calendar, Drive, Notion, Linear, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Attio, Calendly, Granola and Wispr Flow into one Up Next list.
2Permission-in-slices model: every action has an 'Ask first' setting, and the agent never acts without your OK.
3Hire button for recurring chores — approve once, then it just asks for confirmation next time.
4No chat box by design: the agent learns context and surfaces what matters instead of waiting for prompts.
5Deterministic completion checking so the agent never grades its own work.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

People whose workday is full of meetings, email and promises to keep

Pain points

Almost every conversation ends with a promise. Keeping up with all of them slowly becomes a job of its own.

Primary needs

Picking up action items, watching signals and prioritizing the way you would.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Lemongraph is a task manager for people whose work is mostly other people. It pulls action items from Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Linear and ten other sources, lines them up in Up Next, and offers a Hire button when it spots a recurring chore. The permission model is the standout: every action has an 'Ask first' setting you can read at a glance, and the product explicitly refuses to ship a chat box. The app UI is polished and native-feeling. The marketing site undersells it badly — dense paragraphs, a buried CTA, a truncated FAQ, and a 10.1-second mobile LCP that will cost real signups. Security headers are thin (4/12, no SPF/DMARC) despite strong privacy claims. Pricing is $0 for 15 chore runs/month or $20/month for 100 and unlimited integrations.

Measure by measure

Usability

Strong integration list (Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Linear, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Attio) and a real free tier at 15 chore runs/month. But the FAQ is truncated, the CTA is buried, and there's no demo or video to show the flow.

Design

App UI is genuinely polished — dimmed completed rows, right-aligned due dates, a scannable 'Ask first' permission column. The marketing site is the weak half: dense unbroken paragraphs and a floating hero box.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 91/100 is genuinely fast. Mobile is the problem: 66/100 with a 10.1s LCP — that's a ten-second wait for the hero to paint on a phone. CLS 0 and TBT 203ms are clean, so it's a payload issue, not a code issue.

Security

Accessibility

Lighthouse 90/100 is solid, but four real failures: contrast, unfocusable skip links, undersized touch targets, and labels that don't match accessible names. No accessibility statement or WCAG mention anywhere on the site.

Growth

A real, specific problem — promises made in meetings and email that nobody tracks — with a genuine wedge: no chat, deterministic completion, and a 'Hire' button for recurring chores. Narrow by design, which limits ceiling but sharpens the pitch.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 10.1s LCP and 66/100 Lighthouse score will cost signups on phones.
Security headers: 4/12 on the probe, no CSP or frame protection, and no SPF/DMARC on the domain.
Homepage: dense unbroken paragraphs, buried CTA, truncated FAQ with no answers, no demo or video.
Accessibility: four failing audits (contrast, skip-link focus, touch targets, label names) and no a11y statement.

Design & Usability

The app itself is the strong half. Screenshots show a macOS-native window with 'Up Next' and 'Tasks Completed' cleanly separated, completed rows dimmed, due dates right-aligned, and a settings table where every action has an explicit 'Ask first' dropdown. That's a permission model you can read at a glance, which is rare. The marketing site is the opposite: a floating black hero box, then paragraphs of philosophy before any UI proof, and a FAQ sidebar showing six questions with zero answers expanded. The CTA sits low with no trust signals around it. Fourteen integrations are listed — Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Linear, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Attio — but there's no demo, no video, and no walkthrough of the flow that makes them matter.

Speed & Security

Desktop Lighthouse lands at 91/100, which is genuinely fast. Mobile is a different story: 66/100 with a 10.1-second LCP. Ten seconds before the hero paints on a phone is enough to lose most visitors, and it's a payload problem, not a code problem — CLS is 0 and TBT is a clean 203ms. Security is mixed. HTTPS is enforced with HSTS, and the site makes concrete privacy promises: AI partners can't train on your data, account deletion erases everything, and the product is built on a permission-in-slices model. But the header probe scores 4/12 — no CSP, no frame protection, no X-Content-Type-Options, no Referrer-Policy, no Permissions-Policy — and the domain has no SPF or DMARC records, meaning anyone can spoof email from lemongraph.dev. No SOC 2, ISO, or pen-test claim was found.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 90/100 on Lighthouse, which sounds better than it is. The four failing audits are the ones that actually bite: insufficient color contrast, skip links that don't take focus, touch targets too small, and visible labels that don't match their accessible names. There's no accessibility statement or WCAG mention on the site, and the copy is English-only. Growth is the most interesting dimension. Lemongraph names a real problem — the promises made in meetings and email that nobody tracks — and aims at a specific customer: people whose workday runs through other people. The wedge is real: no chat box, deterministic completion checking so the agent never grades its own work, and a 'Hire' button for recurring chores that asks once and then just requests an OK. That's a sharper position than the general-assistant crowd it name-checks. The limit is ceiling: a deliberately narrow tool for one kind of day, priced at $20/month, competing against Todoist and Things which cost less and do the adjacent job.

Conclusion

If you live in meetings and your to-do list is really a list of things you promised other people, Lemongraph is aimed squarely at you and the permission model is worth the look. Start on the free tier — 15 chore runs a month is enough to know whether the triage actually matches how you'd sort your own day. Before you connect Gmail and Calendar, read the security page and decide whether the header gaps matter for your threat model. And if you're the maker: fix the mobile LCP, expand the FAQ, and put a real demo above the fold. The product is better than the page selling it.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the 10.1s mobile LCP — compress hero assets and defer non-critical JS; desktop already proves the stack can be fast.
Add CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and publish SPF/DMARC records for the domain.
Expand the homepage FAQ so answers are visible, and move a real product demo or video above the fold.
Publish an accessibility statement and fix the four failing audits: contrast, skip-link focus, touch targets, label names.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Lemongraph	Todoist	Things	Any.do
Pricing	Free ($0, 15 chore runs/mo) or Pro $20/mo (100 runs, unlimited integrations)	Free tier; Pro ~$4/mo billed annually; Business ~$6/user/mo	One-time purchase ~$49.99 Mac, ~$9.99 iPhone/iPad; no subscription	Free tier; Premium ~$3/mo; Family plan available
AI action-item capture from email and meetings	Yes — core feature; pulls promises from Gmail, Calendar, Granola, Wispr Flow	Limited AI assist for task creation; no meeting/email promise extraction	No — manual entry only, no AI capture	Basic AI assistant for list creation; no promise tracking
Permission controls for automated actions	Per-action 'Ask first' vs 'Always allow' with permission-in-slices model	N/A — no autonomous actions to permission	N/A — no autonomous actions	N/A — no autonomous actions
Integrations	Gmail, Google Calendar, Drive, Tasks, Cal.com, Calendly, Granola, Wispr Flow, Notion, Linear, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Attio	80+ integrations incl. Gmail, Calendar, Slack, Notion, Zapier	Minimal — Calendar, Reminders; no third-party app integrations	Calendar, WhatsApp, Slack, Gmail, Zapier
Chat / prompt-based interface	No chat by design — learns context and surfaces tasks proactively	Natural-language quick add; no chat assistant	No	AI assistant chat for list creation