Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

AI that grades your trading chart before you enter

Speed

Lighthouse desktop 99/100 but mobile 69/100 with a 4.8s LCP and 283ms TBT. Fine on a laptop, sluggish on the phone traders actually check charts on.

Screenshots

1 / 1

SnapPChart

About this app

SnapPChart turns a chart screenshot into a structured, repeatable trade review. Instead of a vague description, you get the same fields on every upload: a letter grade from A+ to F, the pattern, key levels, an entry zone, a stop with rationale, two profit targets with risk/reward, and an explicit bear case. It reads stocks, forex, crypto, futures, and ETFs from any platform because it works off the image, not a data feed. The point is consistency: grade every setup against identical criteria so an A setup and a C setup are scored the same way and your own bias does not move the grade. New users get two free grades, no card required. Paid plans grade every chart and keep the history.

Key features

1Screenshot-based chart grading: upload a PNG/JPG/WebP from any platform and get an A+ to F setup grade with entry, stop, targets, and R/R.
2Trader Profile tunes grades to your style (scalp/day/swing), market (stocks/futures/crypto/forex), and bias — optional, defaults handled.
3Consistent rubric across every upload, plus saved history and an AI coach that flags repeating patterns after five setups.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Active day traders (stocks, forex, crypto)

Pain points

Overtrading, impulsive entries, lack of objective feedback

Primary needs

Quick validation of trade setups before risking capital

Demographic

Swing traders and position traders

Pain points

Difficulty identifying high-probability setups, emotional bias

Primary needs

Structured analysis with clear entry, stop, and targets

Demographic

Prop firm challenge participants

Pain points

Strict risk management rules, need to avoid overtrading

Primary needs

Disciplined trade grading and risk assessment

Demographic

Beginner traders learning technical analysis

Pain points

Lack of experience in reading charts and managing risk

Primary needs

Educational feedback and a second opinion on setups

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

SnapPChart is a focused, well-presented tool that does one thing: turn a chart screenshot into a graded trade plan with entry, stop, targets, R/R, and a written thesis. The design is the standout — the sample output card is the best sales asset on the site. Usability is clean, onboarding is fast, and the pricing ladder ($4.99/week, $19.99/month, $199.99/year) is sensibly tiered for a trader testing the waters. Security is solid for its stage. The weaknesses are mobile performance (4.8s LCP), a pinch-zoom-blocking viewport, and a two-grade free tier that's too thin to build trust. The idea is genuinely differentiated against TradingView and StocksToTrade, but the moat is a prompt, not a platform.

Measure by measure

Usability

Drag-and-drop upload, no symbol entry, two free grades without a card, and a pricing FAQ that actually answers questions. Onboarding-to-value is short and the optional Trader Profile avoids forcing setup.

Design

Dark, modern trading-dashboard aesthetic with a consistent card system across homepage and pricing. The sample NVDA grade card is the strongest asset — it shows the product instead of describing it.

Speed

Lighthouse desktop 99/100 but mobile 69/100 with a 4.8s LCP and 283ms TBT. Fine on a laptop, sluggish on the phone traders actually check charts on.

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, and most hardening headers present (10/12). Stripe handles payments. No CSP header and no published SOC 2, pen-test, or bug bounty.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 95/100, but the viewport disables pinch-zoom (user-scalable=no) and some visible text labels lack matching accessible names. No WCAG statement published.

Growth

Real problem (inconsistent, biased self-grading), specific segment (day/swing traders, prop-firm challengers), and a genuine wedge: screenshot-based grading that TradingView and StocksToTrade don't offer.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 4.8s LCP and 69/100 Lighthouse mobile score hurt a phone-first audience.
Free tier is two lifetime grades — too thin to build trust before asking for a card.
No published security or methodology page: how grades are generated and how screenshots are stored is undocumented.

Design & Usability

SnapPChart's design is the strongest part of the package. The dark dashboard aesthetic is consistent from homepage to pricing, and the sample NVDA 1H card — A− grade, entry $142.30, stop $138.50, target $148.20, R/R 2.6:1, plus a written thesis — does more selling than any headline could. Usability follows through: drag-and-drop upload, no symbol to type, PNG/JPG/WebP up to 10MB, and two free grades with no card. The Trader Profile is optional and the site says so plainly. The pricing FAQ answers the questions people actually ask (what's in the free tier, weekly vs monthly, cancellation, supported markets). Where it slips: the free tier is two lifetime grades, which is enough to feel the product and not enough to trust it, and there's no visible documentation or help center beyond the FAQ.

Speed & Security

Speed is a split verdict. Desktop Lighthouse performance is 99/100 — genuinely fast. Mobile is 69/100 with a 4.8s LCP, 2.7s FCP, and 283ms TBT, which is the number that matters for a tool aimed at people who screenshot charts on their phone. Security is quietly competent: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy all present, 10 of 12 checklist points, with Stripe handling payments so card data never touches the app. The gaps are the usual early-stage ones — no CSP header, and no published SOC 2, ISO, pen-test, or bug bounty. For a product that ingests screenshots of live positions, a security page would be a reasonable next step, but nothing here is broken.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 95/100 on Lighthouse, which is high, but two real failures sit underneath: the viewport sets user-scalable=no, blocking pinch-zoom, and some visible text labels don't have matching accessible names. Both are cheap to fix and both matter for a mobile-heavy audience. There's no WCAG statement or a11y page. Growth is the more interesting question. The problem is real — traders grade their own setups with their own bias and call it analysis — and the wedge is specific: screenshot-based grading that works on any platform, with identical criteria every time. TradingView is a charting and social platform; StocksToTrade is scanners and alerts. Neither grades a screenshot against a fixed rubric. The target segment (day traders, prop-firm challenge participants, beginners wanting structured feedback) is narrow but pays. The limit is that the moat is thin: the grading is an AI prompt, and the incumbents could bolt it on. Domain registered October 2025, one social profile listed — early, but the idea has room.

Conclusion

If you're a day trader who already screenshots charts and argues with yourself about whether the setup is good, SnapPChart is worth two free grades to see if the AI's read matches yours. If it does, you've learned nothing. If it doesn't, that's the product working. The $4.99 weekly plan is the honest way to test it — run a real week, grade 15 setups, and see whether the grades change any decision you make. If they don't, cancel and you've lost less than a bad scalp. If they do, the $199.99 yearly is cheap relative to one avoided red day. The caveats are real: mobile is slow, the free tier is thin, and the grading quality is the entire product — so test it on setups you already know the answer to before you trust it on ones you don't.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the mobile LCP (4.8s) — compress the hero, defer non-critical JS, and serve responsive images.
Remove user-scalable=no from the viewport and add accessible names to the labeled text elements.
Expand the free tier to five grades or add a 7-day trial — two lifetime grades is too thin to build trust.
Publish a security and methodology page: how grades are generated, what data is stored, and how screenshots are handled.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	SnapPChart	TradingView	StocksToTrade
AI setup grading from a chart screenshot	Core feature — A+ to F grade with entry, stop, targets, R/R, and written thesis	Not offered — charting and social analysis only	Not offered — scanners, alerts, and trade ideas
Works from any platform via screenshot (no data feed)	Yes — TradingView, Webull, ThinkOrSwim, Robinhood, IBKR, MetaTrader	Native charts only — analysis happens inside TradingView	Platform-bound — data and scanners live inside StocksToTrade
Consistent grading rubric across every setup	Yes — identical criteria per upload, explicitly anti-bias	No — analysis is user-driven and community opinion varies	No — alerts and scanners, no standardized setup grade
Free tier without a credit card	2 lifetime grades, no card required	Free plan with limited indicators and one chart per layout	Trial-based; full access requires paid subscription
Pricing entry point	$4.99/week, $19.99/month, $199.99/year (unlimited grades)	Free tier; paid plans scale well above $19.99/month	Monthly subscription, typically higher than $19.99