Usability63Design68Speed82Security52Accessibility76Growth62

Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

One API key for scraper APIs on 106 platforms, web search, CAPTCHA solving and AI, with a remote MCP server for agents.

Security

52

HTTPS enforced, HSTS, SPF and DMARC in place, but no CSP, no frame protection, no nosniff, no Referrer-Policy — 6/12 probe points. No SOC 2, ISO or bug bounty published.

Screenshots

1 / 1

About this app

EveryInfra gives developers and AI agents one API key for public web data. It covers 573 data APIs across 106 platforms (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Amazon, Reddit, LinkedIn, Google Maps, Xiaohongshu, Douyin and more), 17 web search tools (web, news, scholar, forums, shopping, maps), CAPTCHA solving for 52 challenge types, and an OpenAI-compatible AI API. You can call it three ways: REST API, a remote MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Codex, or the SDK. Billing is pay per call, from $0.56 per 1,000 calls for data APIs. Failed calls and empty results are not charged. Docs: https://everyinfra.com/en/docs

Key features

  • 1Unified data API: 573 capabilities across 106 platforms (TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Amazon, Reddit, LinkedIn, Xiaohongshu, Douyin) with consistent JSON field names.
  • 2EverySearch: 17 retrieval tools including web, news, scholar, forums, shopping, maps and cross-source verification, with page body returned on deep search.
  • 3EverySolve: 52 CAPTCHA types returning token, cookie, coordinates or text, billed only on success.
  • 4Remote MCP server at /mcp (12 tools) and /mcp/all (24 tools) with one-click Claude and Cursor deploys.
  • 5Free OpenAI-compatible AI endpoint (base_url https://api.everyinfra.com/api/v1) for any topped-up account, default model gemini-3.6-flash.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

AI engineers building agents and RAG pipelines

Pain points

Juggling separate scraping, search and CAPTCHA vendors; brittle in-house crawlers

Primary needs

One key, MCP-ready tools, reliable structured JSON output

Demographic

Indie SaaS founders and small dev teams

Pain points

Proxy costs, platform bans, per-vendor subscriptions add up fast

Primary needs

Pay-as-you-go pricing, no failed-call charges, quick integration

Demographic

E-commerce and market-research analysts

Pain points

Manual review and price tracking across Amazon, Taobao, Shopee and Walmart

Primary needs

Bulk review/comment collection and free AI cleanup of the data

Demographic

Social media and content marketing teams

Pain points

Hard to monitor TikTok, Xiaohongshu and Reddit sentiment at scale

Primary needs

Trending and comment APIs plus AI summarization and tagging

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

EveryInfra is an ambitious consolidation play: 573 data capabilities across 106 platforms, 17 search tools, 52 CAPTCHA types and a free OpenAI-compatible AI endpoint, all behind one API key and one wallet, callable via REST, remote MCP or SDK. The measured evidence backs up the engineering: Lighthouse mobile 93/100 with CLS 0, desktop 100/100, accessibility 97/100. The docs are genuinely deep for a product this young, with per-endpoint tables, catalog endpoints, rate-limit tiers and explicit batching guidance. The pricing model is honest in a way the category usually isn't — failed calls and empty results aren't charged, and the AI endpoint is free once you've topped up. The weaknesses are equally concrete: a security posture of 6/12 header checks with no published audits, a Chinese-first site with no accessibility statement, and a $1 trial gated behind starring two GitHub repos. The idea has a real wedge in vendor consolidation; whether it becomes a moat depends on execution the product hasn't yet had time to prove.

Measure by measure

Usability

63

Docs are genuinely deep — per-endpoint tables, catalog endpoints, MCP tool counts, rate-limit tiers. But the free tier makes you star two GitHub repos before you can spend a cent.

Design

68

Dense but deliberate dark landing page with real returned JSON as the demo instead of stock screenshots. Chinese-first copy limits reach, and the page tries to show four products at once.

Speed

82

Lighthouse mobile 93/100 (LCP 2.9s, CLS 0, TBT 153ms) and desktop 100/100 — strong for a page carrying a scroll animation and a live AI demo widget.

Security

52

HTTPS enforced, HSTS, SPF and DMARC in place, but no CSP, no frame protection, no nosniff, no Referrer-Policy — 6/12 probe points. No SOC 2, ISO or bug bounty published.

Accessibility

76

Lighthouse accessibility 97/100, with two real failures: touch targets too small and visible labels without matching accessible names. No WCAG statement or a11y page published.

Growth

62

Real, specific wedge: one key and one wallet across scraping, search, CAPTCHA and a free AI cleanup endpoint, billed per call with failures free. Consolidation is a genuine reason to switch.

Improvement areas

  • Security headers: no CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy or Permissions-Policy (6/12 probe points).
  • No published SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test summary or bug bounty despite handling CAPTCHA, SMS and proxy infrastructure.
  • Trial friction: $1 credit requires starring two GitHub repos, expires in 24 hours, and cannot be used on CAPTCHA.
  • Accessibility gaps: two failing Lighthouse audits (touch targets, accessible name matching) and no WCAG statement or a11y page.

Design & Usability

EveryInfra's site is a dark, dense, Chinese-first page that tries to sell four products in one scroll: data scraping, CAPTCHA solving, web search and a free AI cleanup endpoint. The best design decision is showing real returned JSON from Xiaohongshu with usernames masked instead of a stock screenshot — that's a credibility move most competitors skip. The worst is the density: an animated scroll section, a live AI playground and four product cards all compete above the fold. Usability is where the product actually shines. The docs are unusually deep for a product this young — per-endpoint tables, catalog endpoints, MCP tool counts (12 vs 24), rate-limit tiers by cumulative top-up, and explicit guidance on batching requests under 45,000 characters. Three integration paths (REST, remote MCP, SDK) with one-click Claude and Cursor deploys is real developer empathy. The friction is the trial: to get $1 of credit you must star two GitHub repos, and the credit expires in 24 hours and can't be used on CAPTCHA. That's a toll booth in front of a free sample.

Speed & Security

Speed is the strongest measured dimension. Lighthouse mobile lands at 93/100 with LCP 2.9s, CLS 0 and TBT 153ms; desktop is a clean 100/100. That's impressive for a page carrying a scroll animation and a live model demo, and it suggests a real CDN and disciplined asset loading rather than a heavy SPA. Security is the weak flank. The probe confirms HTTPS enforcement, HSTS, SPF and DMARC, but only 6 of 12 checklist points: no Content-Security-Policy, no frame protection, no X-Content-Type-Options, no Referrer-Policy, no Permissions-Policy. For a product whose core offering is CAPTCHA solving, disposable SMS numbers and residential proxies, the absence of a published SOC 2, ISO 27001, pen-test summary or bug bounty is a real gap, not just a small-team omission. The docs do describe scoped API keys per environment and per-purpose revocation, which is a genuine mitigation. But the compliance surface is thin for a vendor that will be asked to sign security questionnaires by any team larger than three people.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 97/100 on automated checks, with two concrete failures: touch targets without sufficient size or spacing, and elements with visible text labels that don't match their accessible names. Both are cheap to fix and both are the kind of thing that shows the audit was never run manually. There is no WCAG statement, no accessibility page and no keyboard-navigation documentation in the fetched content, and the site is Chinese-first with an English path rather than a genuinely localized experience. Growth is the most interesting question. The category is crowded — Apify owns the scraper marketplace, SerpApi owns SERP trust, Firecrawl owns LLM-ready markdown, Bright Data owns enterprise proxy infrastructure — but each of those solves one slice, and EveryInfra's wedge is consolidation: one key, one wallet, per-call billing, no charge on failures, plus a free OpenAI-compatible endpoint for any topped-up account. That last piece is a genuine retention hook competitors don't obviously match. The limit is that consolidation is a pricing and integration story, not a moat; any of the four incumbents could bundle the same thing. The domain is roughly 0.3 years old, so this is early — the idea has room, the execution has to earn it.

Conclusion

If you're an AI engineer currently wiring together a scraper vendor, a SERP vendor and a CAPTCHA service, EveryInfra is worth an afternoon. The consolidation is real, the docs will not waste your time, and the no-charge-on-failure billing removes the worst part of per-call pricing. Go in with eyes open: you are buying from a company roughly three months old, with no SOC 2, no bug bounty and five missing security headers. Scope your API keys tightly, don't hand it your production credentials on day one, and treat the free AI endpoint as a convenience rather than a dependency. For indie teams and solo builders, the math is compelling. For anyone who needs to pass a vendor security review, wait for the compliance page.

Suggestions for improvement

  • Publish a security page with SOC 2 status, a pen-test summary and a vulnerability disclosure contact — the current 6/12 header score will fail enterprise questionnaires.
  • Add the missing headers: CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy. These are hours of work, not months.
  • Drop the GitHub-star requirement for the $1 trial, or extend the 24-hour expiry. It's the single biggest friction point before first value.
  • Fix the two failing accessibility audits (touch target sizing, accessible name matching) and publish a WCAG 2.2 AA statement — cheap, and it signals care.
How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

EveryInfraApifySerpApiFirecrawlBright Data
Pricing modelPay per call from $0.56/1k data calls; failed and empty results not charged; top-up tiers $10–$1,000Per-actor pricing plus platform credits; costs vary by actor and can add upMonthly plans with per-search credits; notably higher per-request costCredit-based subscription tiers by page/crawl volumeEnterprise contracts plus usage-based proxy bandwidth; heavier commitment
Platform-specific structured data573 capabilities across 106 platforms with unified JSON field names; change one platform fieldLarge marketplace of prebuilt actors per platform; output schemas vary by actorSearch engine results only; no platform content scrapingGeneric page-to-markdown and site crawling; no platform-specific extractorsBroad scraping infrastructure and datasets; platform coverage via config, not a unified schema
CAPTCHA solving52 types (Turnstile, reCAPTCHA v2/v3, hCaptcha, GeeTest, DataDome, Cloudflare) at $0.14–$4.58/1k, success-only billingNot a core offering; relies on third-party services or actor-level integrationsNot offeredNot offeredCAPTCHA handling available within unblocking/proxy products, not a standalone per-type API
MCP / agent integrationRemote MCP server: /mcp with 12 tools, /mcp/all with 24; one-click Claude and Cursor deploysMCP server available exposing actors as toolsREST API; MCP via community serversOfficial MCP server for crawl and scrape operationsMCP server for its scraping and search products
Free AI cleanup endpointOpenAI-compatible chat/completions free for any topped-up account; rate tiers by cumulative top-upNot offered; bring your own LLMNot offeredExtraction features but no bundled free LLM endpointAI-related data tooling, not a free OpenAI-compatible endpoint
Published security complianceHTTPS, HSTS, SPF, DMARC; no SOC 2, ISO, pen-test or bug bounty publishedSOC 2 Type II, GDPR tooling and a security pageSecurity page with compliance documentationSOC 2 Type II and published security documentationISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR and extensive compliance tooling

Comparing options? See EveryInfra alternatives, scored side by side

View all API Service
Scout Forge

A platform dedicated to providing unbiased reviews of newly launched applications, analyzing everything from their features to their full potential.

info@scoutforge.net

© 2026 Scoutforge. All rights reserved.

EveryInfra Review | Scout Forge