Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Let AI schedule every post; you keep full control.

Design

Clean white-and-blue palette with a well-ranked CTA pair, but the hero screenshot is too small to read, a section renders blank, and an icon appears cut off. Polished bones, sloppy execution.

Screenshots

1 / 1

OmniSocials

About this app

OmniSocials is a social media scheduler your AI agents can use. Connect Claude, ChatGPT or any agent through MCP, the API or the CLI, and it plans, writes and schedules posts across 13 platforms, including Instagram, LinkedIn, X, TikTok and YouTube. You stay in control from a visual calendar with drafts and approvals, plus a social inbox and analytics. One plan from $10 a month per seat, with a 14-day free trial.

Key features

1Agent-native scheduling via MCP, API, CLI and webhooks across 13 social platforms
2Visual calendar with drafts, approvals and a unified social inbox plus analytics
3One flat $10/seat/month plan with unlimited posts and full API access, 14-day trial

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Solo founders and small businesses

Pain points

Scheduling posts on every social network separately takes time

Primary needs

Let an AI agent plan and schedule posts on 13 platforms from one visual calendar

Demographic

Developers and AI-agent builders

Pain points

Every social network has its own API to integrate

Primary needs

One API, an MCP server, a CLI, webhooks and SDKs in 8 languages

Demographic

Agencies running client accounts

Pain points

Client posts need review before they go live

Primary needs

Drafts and approval workflows for team and client review

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

OmniSocials is a competent, actively maintained social scheduler with a genuinely interesting angle: it's built to be driven by AI agents through MCP, an API and a CLI, across 13 platforms, for a flat $10 per seat. The site is fast (Lighthouse 92), the pricing is refreshingly simple, and the changelog shows real shipping velocity. The weak spots are presentation and clarity — a hero screenshot too small to read, a blank section, a nearly invisible audience toggle, and messaging that can't decide if it's for developers or humans. Security is solid on headers but lacks published audits. A promising product that needs to tighten its front door.

Measure by measure

Usability

One flat $10/seat plan with everything included, a 14-day trial, and 54 changelog releases in 2026 signal a maintained, low-friction product. Audience messaging is muddled between devs and humans.

Design

Clean white-and-blue palette with a well-ranked CTA pair, but the hero screenshot is too small to read, a section renders blank, and an icon appears cut off. Polished bones, sloppy execution.

Speed

Lighthouse desktop 92/100 with LCP 1.3s, CLS 0 and TBT 136ms — a genuinely snappy marketing site. Product app performance not independently measured.

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, SPF and DMARC in place (9/12 checklist). CSP and Permissions-Policy missing, and no SOC 2, ISO or bug bounty claims found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 97/100 with a single failing contrast audit. No WCAG statement or multi-language support evidenced, but the automated baseline is strong.

Growth

A real problem (multi-platform scheduling) with a genuine wedge: agent-native MCP/API/CLI access at a flat $10/seat. Crowded category, but the agent angle is specific and underserved.

Improvement areas

Homepage execution: unreadable hero screenshot, blank section, cut-off icon
Audience clarity: developer vs. human messaging and a near-invisible toggle
Security transparency: missing CSP/Permissions-Policy and no published audits
Accessibility: contrast failure and no WCAG statement or multi-language support

Design & Usability

The landing page has the bones of a professional product: a restrained blue-and-white palette, a clear primary CTA, and a pricing page that does something rare — one flat $10/seat plan with all 13 platforms, unlimited posts, inbox, analytics and MCP/API access, no feature gates. The changelog backs it up with 54 releases in 2026. Where it stumbles is execution and clarity: the hero screenshot is too small to read, a homepage section renders blank, an icon appears cut off, and the only audience toggle between 'developer' and 'human' is a faint grey control most visitors will miss. The messaging itself splits the difference — 'API for AI Agents' up top, 'calendar built for humans' below — leaving a first-time visitor unsure who this is for.

Speed & Security

Speed is a genuine strength: Lighthouse desktop scores 92/100 with LCP 1.3s, CLS 0 and TBT 136ms, so the marketing site loads fast and stable. Security is competent but not exceptional — HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, SPF and DMARC all present, landing 9/12 on the header checklist. The gaps are a missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy, and there is no published SOC 2, ISO certification, pen-test summary or bug bounty to point to. For a tool that holds social account OAuth tokens and client content, those are the next things to add.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores well on automated checks — 97/100 on Lighthouse with a single failing contrast audit — but there's no WCAG conformance statement, no documented keyboard or screen-reader support, and no multi-language evidence. The contrast failure is telling: it's the same low-contrast styling that makes the developer toggle nearly invisible. On growth, the idea holds up. Scheduling across 13 platforms is a real, paid problem, and OmniSocials' wedge is specific: agent-native access via MCP, API, CLI and webhooks, at a flat $10/seat with everything included. The category is crowded — Buffer, Hootsuite, Later and a wave of AI schedulers — so the agent angle and flat pricing are the differentiators. Whether that wedge survives depends on whether incumbents bolt on MCP support before OmniSocials builds a moat.

Conclusion

If you're a solo founder, small agency or developer who wants your AI agent to handle scheduling across a dozen networks without per-channel fees, OmniSocials is worth the 14-day trial — the flat $10/seat plan and MCP access are the real draw. If you need enterprise compliance paperwork or a polished, self-explanatory marketing site, wait for a few more releases. The product is clearly being built; the storefront just hasn't caught up.

Suggestions for improvement

Replace the tiny hero screenshot with a full-width, high-resolution calendar view that shows real posts and status chips legibly.
Fix the blank second homepage section and the cut-off icon after 'AI Agents' — these read as rendering bugs to first-time visitors.
Make the developer/human audience toggle high-contrast and prominent, or split the messaging into two clear paths.
Publish a security page with CSP headers, a pen-test summary or SOC 2 roadmap, and an accessibility/WCAG statement.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	OmniSocials
Pricing model	Flat $10/seat/month, all features included	Not provided
AI agent / API access	MCP server, API, CLI, webhooks, SDKs in 8 languages	Not provided
Supported platforms	13 platforms incl. Instagram, LinkedIn, X, TikTok, YouTube	Not provided
Approval workflows	Drafts and approval workflows for team/client review	Not provided