Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Social Media Scraping API

Growth

10-day-old domain with zero external mentions, reviews, or community; judged on trajectory only.

Screenshots

1 / 1

SocQ

About this app

Scrape profiles, posts, videos, comments, ad libraries, and metrics from Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, X, Reddit, and more with one API.

Key features

1One API for profiles, posts, comments, ads across 8+ platforms with normalized JSON
2Credit-based pricing per result with transparent per-platform rates and request logs
3Async tasks, webhooks, and Bearer auth with copyable quickstart code in 3 languages

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Growth engineering lead at a B2B analytics product

Pain points

Skipping platform-specific collectors and shipping social data features quickly

Primary needs

One API to access public social data with clean contracts

Demographic

Technical founder building a creator intelligence tool

Pain points

Maintaining separate scrapers for each social platform

Primary needs

Normalized fields and reliable API for profiles, posts, and engagement

Demographic

Data operations manager at a market research platform

Pain points

Rebuilding connectors every time a platform updates its API

Primary needs

Stable, production-ready API with webhook monitoring

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

SocQ delivers a unified social scraping API with normalized responses and credit-based pricing across Instagram through Reddit. The site emphasizes quick integration via code samples and request logs, targeting developers tired of maintaining per-platform collectors. As a ten-day-old product it shows promise in developer experience claims but lacks any external validation or hardened security posture.

Measure by measure

Usability

Live code quickstarts and transparent per-endpoint pricing lower the barrier; lacks dedicated docs or onboarding flow.

Design

Dark theme with orange CTAs provides clear visual priority, but busy skyline background and truncated pills hurt polish.

Speed

Desktop is snappy at 95, but mobile LCP of 7.5s drags real-world feel despite solid CLS/TBT numbers.

Security

Basic HTTPS and SPF only; zero published compliance, audits, or advanced headers on a brand-new scraping API.

Accessibility

Strong automated score of 96 undercut by one contrast failure; no deeper a11y docs or multi-language support beyond toggle.

Growth

10-day-old domain with zero external mentions, reviews, or community; judged on trajectory only.

Improvement areas

Missing security headers and any compliance documentation on a data API
Mobile hero and feature pills suffer from contrast and truncation issues
Zero external reviews or community after 10 days live

Design & Usability

SocQ's landing page leans on a moody skyline and bold orange CTAs for immediate visual impact, yet truncation on feature pills and overlapping nav links reveal rushed responsive work. The three-step quickstart with real code snippets and per-endpoint credit pricing on the separate pricing page give developers a fast path to value. Navigation feels early-stage with 'Explore' and 'Platforms' serving similar purposes, but the copy-paste examples and transparent costs compensate for the missing dedicated documentation hub.

Speed & Security

Lighthouse shows desktop performance at 95 while mobile lags at 74 due to a 7.5-second LCP, likely from the heavy hero image. Security is minimal: HTTPS and SPF are present, but the absence of HSTS, CSP, and any compliance claims leaves the API exposed on paper. For a product this new, these basics are table stakes rather than differentiators against established scrapers.

Accessibility & Growth

Automated accessibility scores 96 with only a single contrast issue flagged, yet no public a11y statement or keyboard support details exist. Growth is nonexistent—domain registered ten days ago with zero reviews, GitHub activity, or community signals across major platforms. Trajectory matters for such a young product, but current traction is effectively zero compared with mature alternatives.

Conclusion

Early days for SocQ mean the focus should stay on shipping reliable endpoints and publishing basic compliance docs before chasing enterprise features.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a public /docs or /developers section with full endpoint reference and error codes
Implement at least HSTS, CSP, and DMARC plus a simple security page
Fix mobile truncation on feature pills and improve hero text contrast
Launch on Product Hunt or Hacker News to generate first traction signals

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	SocQ	Brandwatch	Talkwalker	Apify
Unified multi-platform API (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, Facebook, LinkedIn, Reddit)	Yes - single REST API with normalized fields	No - broad listening platform, not unified developer API	No - media monitoring focus, higher complexity	Partial - requires individual actors per platform
Credit / pay-per-result transparent pricing	Yes - listed per endpoint (e.g. 0.34 credits/post)	No - enterprise subscriptions, custom quotes	No - enterprise licensing model	Yes - pay-per-usage with actor credits
Production-ready normalized JSON + request logs	Yes - claims clean contracts and dashboard logs	Partial - rich analytics but not raw normalized API	Partial - analytics dashboards over raw API	Yes - structured datasets from actors