Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

One API for Google Search and AI answers from ChatGPT, Ge...

Security

HTTPS enforced, some headers set (X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy), SPF/DMARC present. Missing HSTS, CSP, frame protection. No SOC 2 or bug bounty mentioned. Checklist 6/12.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Cloro

About this app

Cloro is a unified API that provides structured data from major search engines and AI chatbots. It is designed for developers and businesses that need real-time, reliable search and AI answer data at scale. With a single integration, you can get clean markdown, sources, and citations from Google Search, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Copilot, among others. Cloro simplifies the complexities of managing multiple API integrations, offering consistent data formats, predictable credit-based pricing, and global coverage including US state-level targeting. Whether you're tracking AI visibility, building search features, monitoring competitors, or conducting research, Cloro delivers the data you need efficiently and cost-effectively.

Key features

1Unified API for Google Search, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and more.
2Structured JSON responses with markdown, sources, citations, and shopping data.
3Credit-based pricing with free tier and volume discounts.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

SEO professionals and digital marketers

Pain points

Difficulty tracking AI search visibility and sources across multiple engines; time-consuming manual checks; lack of consistent data.

Primary needs

Automated AI visibility tracking, source attribution, and competitor analysis.

Demographic

Developers and engineering teams building search-related applications

Pain points

Integrating multiple APIs for different search engines is complex and costly; maintaining separate integrations is time-consuming.

Primary needs

A single, unified API for search and AI answers with structured JSON, easy integration, and scalability.

Demographic

Enterprises and research organizations monitoring brand reputation or gathering market intel

Pain points

Need for large-scale, reliable search data; dealing with inconsistent data from various sources; budget unpredictability.

Primary needs

Cost-effective, high-volume search data extraction with predictable pricing and comprehensive coverage.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Cloro offers a compelling unified API for AI search engines, targeting SEO professionals and developers. The design is clean and developer-friendly, with strong performance and accessibility. Pricing is credit-based with a free tier, but the 11 tiers may be overwhelming. Security is basic, lacking HSTS and CSP, and no SOC 2 is mentioned. Growth potential is solid given the AI search trend, but the product is early-stage and faces competition from established APIs. Overall, a promising tool with room to mature in security and market presence.

Measure by measure

Usability

Prominent CTA, copyable code examples with tabs, and docs with llms.txt for AI assistants. Pricing table is dense but scannable. 11 tiers might overwhelm, but free tier lowers barrier.

Design

Clean dark theme with high contrast and readable code blocks. Clear hierarchy in hero and pricing. Minor inconsistencies: Grok badge, decorative charts, and pricing repetition.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 95/100 (LCP 2.9s, CLS 0.003, TBT 2ms), desktop 100/100. Fast, lightweight, no lag complaints found. Excellent performance for a developer tool.

Security

HTTPS enforced, some headers set (X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy), SPF/DMARC present. Missing HSTS, CSP, frame protection. No SOC 2 or bug bounty mentioned. Checklist 6/12.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 100/100, indicating strong automated compliance. No explicit WCAG statement or multi-language support, but site is responsive and keyboard-navigable. Good for a developer tool.

Growth

Unified API for AI search engines is a real need with clear differentiator. Targets SEO pros and developers. Early-stage (domain 1 year), but category has headroom as AI search grows.

Improvement areas

Security headers (HSTS, CSP) and certifications (SOC 2) are missing.
Pricing page has 11 tiers, which may overwhelm users.
Traction claims (1B calls) lack third-party verification.

Design & Usability

Cloro's dark theme is polished and developer-focused, with high contrast and readable code blocks. The hero section clearly communicates the value proposition, and the engine status badges are a nice touch. Usability is strong: prominent CTAs, copyable code examples, and docs optimized for AI assistants. However, the pricing page repeats tier cards in a table, and 11 tiers may overwhelm. The free tier is a good entry point, but the 'Documentation assistant' support on Free is minimal. Overall, a solid design that prioritizes clarity, though minor inconsistencies like the Grok badge and decorative charts could be refined.

Speed & Security

Performance is a standout: Lighthouse mobile 95/100 and desktop 100/100, with fast LCP and minimal layout shift. The site feels snappy, which is crucial for a developer tool. Security is more concerning: HTTPS is enforced, but missing HSTS, CSP, and frame protection headers leave room for improvement. No SOC 2 or bug bounty is mentioned, which may be a concern for enterprise buyers. The checklist score of 6/12 reflects a basic security posture that's on par with early-stage tools but could be strengthened. For a product handling search data, investing in security certifications would build trust.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is strong with a 100/100 Lighthouse score, though no explicit WCAG statement or multi-language support is evident. The site is responsive and keyboard-navigable, which is good for a developer audience. Growth potential is promising: the unified API for AI search engines addresses a real pain point for SEO professionals and developers. The category has headroom as AI search becomes more prevalent. However, the product is early-stage (domain registered a year ago), and competition from established players like SerpApi is fierce. The differentiator of AI-specific engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity) is compelling, but execution and trust-building will be key.

Conclusion

If you're tracking AI visibility or building search features, Cloro is worth a try with its free tier. The unified API simplifies integration, but ensure your security requirements are met. As the AI search landscape evolves, Cloro could become a go-to, but it needs to build trust with certifications and more transparent traction. For now, it's a solid early-stage option with a bright future if executed well.

Suggestions for improvement

Add HSTS, CSP, and frame protection headers to strengthen security posture.
Pursue SOC 2 or ISO certification to build trust with enterprise customers.
Simplify pricing by reducing the number of tiers or making the comparison table more distinct.
Add multi-language support and an explicit accessibility statement to broaden reach.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Cloro	SerpApi	ScrapingBee	Zenserp
AI search engine coverage	Supports ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overview, Google Search, News.	Primarily Google Search, with some AI Overview support.	Google Search and other engines, but no AI chatbot coverage.	Google Search only, no AI chatbot support.
Pricing model	Credit-based, free tier 500 credits/mo, paid from $30/mo.	Pay-per-search, free 100 searches/mo, paid from $50/mo.	Credit-based, free 1,000 credits, paid from $49/mo.	Pay-per-request, free 50 requests/mo, paid from $49/mo.
Response format	Structured JSON with markdown, sources, citations, shopping data.	JSON with SERP data, but no AI answer sources.	JSON/HTML, but no AI-specific structured data.	JSON with SERP data, no AI answer sources.