Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Local secret scanner for AI-assisted development, catchin...

Growth

Brand-new (v1.3.0, Microlaunch yesterday), no reviews, no GitHub activity, no community. Free tier exists but traction is nonexistent.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Trestle

About this app

Trestle is a local secret scanner that integrates directly into your editor, CI pipeline, and AI assistants like Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot. It detects hardcoded credentials, API keys, private keys, and other secrets using language-aware parsers and entropy checks. With deep git history scanning, pre-commit hooks, and real-time watch mode, Trestle helps ensure secrets never leave your machine. Free and open source for individuals, with a Pro tier for commercial teams needing remediation guidance and priority support.

Key features

1Local-only scanning with MCP integration for Claude, Cursor, Copilot
2Language-aware parsers + entropy detection + deep git history
3Pre-commit hooks, watch mode, SARIF/JUnit output, Pro remediation guidance

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Individual developers using AI coding assistants

Pain points

AI agents often inadvertently hardcode credentials in generated code; need a way to catch these before committing.

Primary needs

Local scanning that integrates with AI tools, low false positives, and no telemetry.

Demographic

Engineering teams in startups and SMBs

Pain points

Secrets leaked via public repos or client-side code lead to breaches; manual reviews are slow and error-prone.

Primary needs

Automated pre-commit hooks, CI integration, and remediation guidance for rotated secrets.

Demographic

Security-conscious DevOps and DevSecOps professionals

Pain points

Need to scan large git histories for leaked credentials without sending data to third parties.

Primary needs

Deep git history scanning, high entropy detection, and support for multiple output formats (SARIF, JUnit, etc.).

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Trestle is a promising local-first secret scanner optimized for AI coding assistants. Strong on privacy, speed, and integrations; weak on accessibility and any real user base. Free tier is genuinely usable for individuals, while Pro targets teams needing remediation guidance.

Measure by measure

Usability

Zero-friction local install, seamless AI/editor/CI hooks, and no-account free tier make onboarding trivial for devs already in the MCP ecosystem.

Design

Polished, modern landing page with clear code demos, stats, and feature sections. Strong visual consistency and branding for a new tool.

Speed

Local multi-threaded binary with cache and watch mode; no network overhead means scans feel instant on typical repos.

Security

True local-only execution, zero telemetry, deep git scanning, and open-source core. Strongest signal among peers for privacy-conscious users.

Accessibility

Zero mentions of WCAG, contrast, keyboard nav, or screen-reader support. Multi-language editor support exists but no a11y claims.

Growth

Brand-new (v1.3.0, Microlaunch yesterday), no reviews, no GitHub activity, no community. Free tier exists but traction is nonexistent.

Improvement areas

Public GitHub presence and community building
Accessibility compliance and testing documentation
Independent benchmarks vs TruffleHog/gitleaks on false positives

Design & Usability

Trestle delivers a clean, modern site that makes secret scanning feel approachable for AI-heavy workflows. The VS Code extension and MCP integration lower the barrier dramatically—no signup, just a binary. Language-aware parsing and pre-commit hooks show thoughtful engineering that actually fits dev loops. Still early days, but the UX polish stands out versus clunky open-source alternatives.

Speed & Security

Speed is a non-issue thanks to local execution and caching. Security posture is excellent: everything stays on-device, with strong git history coverage and multiple output formats for CI. The absence of any cloud dependency or data sharing is refreshing in a space full of telemetry-heavy SaaS tools.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is basically absent—no WCAG mentions or testing signals—which is a glaring gap for a tool targeting broad developer adoption. Growth is minimal; this is a fresh launch with zero visible community, reviews, or GitHub momentum. It has the bones of a useful indie project but needs serious traction work to matter.

Conclusion

If you're already deep in Cursor/Claude and hate sending code anywhere, Trestle is worth a spin. For everyone else, the established open-source options still win on maturity.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a public GitHub repo with stars and issues for transparency.
Publish basic WCAG audit and improve contrast/keyboard support.
Create a simple demo video and G2 listing to build early credibility.
Expand free-tier remediation examples to reduce Pro upsell friction.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Trestle	GitGuardian	TruffleHog	gitleaks
Deployment model	Fully local binary, no cloud	Cloud-based with account required	Open-source, local + optional cloud	Open-source, fully local
AI assistant integration	Native MCP server for Claude/Cursor/Copilot	API/webhook integrations only	CLI only, no built-in MCP	CLI only, no built-in MCP
Remediation guidance	Pro tier only: rotation playbooks per platform	Built-in remediation suggestions	Basic CLI output only	Basic CLI output only