Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Password manager with no email, no account, no tracking. ...

Growth

Real, specific wedge: no email, zero-knowledge, on-chain identity, IPFS sync, open source. Differentiated from Bitwarden/1Password/Proton Pass, but the no-account audience is a slice, not the market.

Screenshots

1 / 1

VaultKeepR

About this app

VaultKeepR is a privacy-first password manager that stands out by eliminating the need for an email or account. It uses a zero-knowledge architecture where your data is encrypted and decrypted only on your device. With support for biometrics, master password, or NFC keys, and modern encryption like Argon2id and XChaCha20-Poly1305, it ensures top-notch security. You can store passwords, documents, and more, with IPFS-based backup and optional encrypted cloud storage. The app is open source and free forever, with premium features like fragmented recovery and email aliases. Available as a browser extension and mobile apps, it also includes a password health checker and TOS analysis for added security. VaultKeepR is ideal for anyone who values privacy and wants a password manager that doesn't track them or require personal information.

Key features

1No email or account required — identity is an on-chain Smart Account; vault encrypted client-side with Argon2id and XChaCha20-Poly1305.
2Multi-modal unlock: biometric passkeys (WebAuthn PRF), master password, or physical NFC backup keys, with Shamir 3-of-5 recovery on Premium.
3IPFS-based encrypted backup and sync, plus optional encrypted cloud storage (S3) from 10 MB free up to unlimited on paid tiers.
4Cross-platform: Chrome/Firefox extension, iOS and Android apps with autofill, TOTP, groups, identities and secure document storage.
5Free forever core with no ads or tracking; Premium adds cloud storage, TOTP, email aliases, Shamir recovery and priority support.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Privacy advocates and security-conscious individuals

Pain points

Tired of password managers that require email and collect data; concerned about data breaches and tracking

Primary needs

Zero-knowledge encryption, no account required, open source, no tracking

Demographic

Tech-savvy users and early adopters

Pain points

Traditional password managers are cumbersome or not truly private; want advanced features like biometrics and IPFS sync

Primary needs

Modern encryption, biometric unlock, IPFS backup, cross-platform support

Demographic

Crypto and Web3 enthusiasts

Pain points

Want to manage credentials and secrets on-chain; dislike centralized identity and servers

Primary needs

Sovereign identity via smart account, on-chain architecture, integration with Web3

Demographic

Businesses and professionals handling sensitive data

Pain points

Need secure password and document storage without compromising privacy; require compliance and auditability

Primary needs

End-to-end encryption, secure document storage, auditability, disaster recovery

Human reviews

What people found in VaultKeepR

Written by Scout Forge members. We do not verify that a reviewer purchased or installed the app.How we handle reviews

Paid review

Funded by the developer, who could not block publication — and the reviewer was paid the same either way.

20credits

aetier

Sep 16, 2026

I looked into VaultKeepR after seeing a lot of discussion about it as an alternative to traditional managers. What makes it different is the architecture. It's built as a zero-knowledge password manager with no email account, no central server. Authentication is via wallet signature, encryption happens locally using Argon2id and XChaCha20-Poly1305, and the encrypted vault is synced via IPFS. The core SDK and Solidity contracts are fully open source on GitHub under MIT, which makes the security claims verifiable. One of the most interesting parts is the recovery system. Instead of a standard password reset, it uses Shamir's Secret Sharing 3-of-5. You distribute fragments to trusted contacts and no single person, including VaultKeepR itself, can reconstruct the vault. Of course there are limitations. The project is still newer than Bitwarden or 1Password, the community is smaller, and the mobile experience is still in active development. Onboarding requires some familiarity with wallets, which may not be ideal for non-technical users. Also there is no account recovery if both master password and recovery fragments are lost. So overall, for anyone looking for a truly decentralized, privacy-first good password manager with verifiable cryptography, VaultKeepR is one of the most compelling options available right now.

Test an app and get paid in credits

Developers fund these. You keep the credits whatever your verdict.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

VaultKeepR is a privacy-first password manager built around a genuinely unusual premise: no email, no account, no registration. Identity is a Smart Account on-chain, the vault is encrypted client-side with Argon2id and XChaCha20-Poly1305, and backups go to IPFS. It ships as a Chrome/Firefox extension plus iOS and Android apps, is open source, and is free forever with paid tiers for cloud storage, TOTP, Shamir recovery and email aliases. The measured evidence backs several of the claims: the site scores 100/100 on desktop Lighthouse and 89/100 on mobile, the HTTP/DNS probe passes all 12 security checks, and the accessibility audit lands at 91/100. The app UI, judged from store screenshots, is clean and consistent with the marketing site. The gaps are equally concrete: no published third-party audit or bug bounty despite a verify-don't-trust pitch, three real accessibility failures (contrast, skip links, touch targets), a 3.5s mobile LCP, and no independent user reviews yet to confirm the onboarding and documentation experience. It is a well-executed, sharply positioned product with an audience narrower than the category leaders — and it knows exactly who it is for.

Measure by measure

Usability

No-email, 2-minute setup is a real onboarding advantage, and the pricing page lays out five tiers plus a full feature matrix. Docs depth and third-party onboarding feedback are unverified.

Design

Judging the app UI and store material: consistent dark palette with red accents, scannable smart tags, spacious mobile screens. Homepage is denser and the dark-on-dark entry rows cost contrast.

Speed

Lighthouse desktop 100/100 and mobile 89/100 with TBT 16ms and CLS 0.062. The 3.5s mobile LCP is the one metric holding it back from the top of the band.

Security

12/12 header/DNS checks pass, HTTPS+HSTS+CSP enforced, Argon2id and XChaCha20-Poly1305 claimed, SLM moved on-device in v1.8.3. No public audit, SOC 2 or bug bounty found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 91/100 with EN/FR localization and hreflang. Failing contrast, non-focusable skip links and undersized touch targets are real, fixable gaps; no WCAG statement published.

Growth

Real, specific wedge: no email, zero-knowledge, on-chain identity, IPFS sync, open source. Differentiated from Bitwarden/1Password/Proton Pass, but the no-account audience is a slice, not the market.

Improvement areas

No published third-party security audit, SOC 2/ISO report or bug bounty despite a 'verify us' positioning — external validation is the biggest gap.
Three Lighthouse accessibility failures: insufficient color contrast on dark vault rows, non-focusable skip links, undersized touch targets.
Mobile LCP of 3.5s drags an otherwise excellent performance profile (desktop 100/100, TBT 16ms) below the 2.5s good threshold.
Five pricing tiers plus a crypto-only lifetime plan is a lot of decision surface; no independent user reviews yet to confirm onboarding and docs.

Design & Usability

Judged on the app UI and store material, not just the landing page: the mobile vault screens are clean, spacious and consistent with the site's dark palette and red accents, and the colored smart tags make entries scannable at a glance. The weak spots are the very dark cards on dark backgrounds, which flatten contrast on the entry rows, and a homepage that stacks feature claims and logos below the fold until it reads like a checklist. On usability, the no-email, no-registration flow is a genuine onboarding advantage — the site promises a 2-minute setup and the store screenshots back the zero-account claim with visible pills and secondary sync options. The pricing page is unusually transparent, with five tiers and a full feature-by-feature matrix, and the changelog shows real iteration (on-device auto-tagging, a backup-password recovery flow for PRF-only vaults). What I could not verify is documentation depth or third-party onboarding feedback — no independent reviews of the setup experience surfaced in the collected evidence, so the learning-curve picture stays incomplete.

Speed & Security

Speed is a strength. Lighthouse gives the site 100/100 on desktop and 89/100 on mobile, with a 16ms total blocking time and 0.062 CLS — the page is light and stable. The one soft metric is a 3.5s mobile LCP, which is what keeps this out of the top of the band rather than any structural problem. No user complaints about lag or published benchmarks were found. Security is where the product makes its loudest claims and, on the surface, backs them: the HTTP/DNS probe passes 12/12 checks with HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, SPF and DMARC all present. The site claims Argon2id key derivation, XChaCha20-Poly1305 encryption, WebAuthn PRF biometrics and Shamir 3-of-5 recovery, and the v1.8.3 changelog documents moving the SLM engine fully on-device so vault URLs and usernames no longer leave the device. What is missing is external validation: no published SOC 2 or ISO report, no named third-party audit and no bug bounty were found in the collected evidence. For a product whose entire pitch is 'don't trust us, verify us', the absence of an independent audit is the gap that matters most.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility lands at a solid-but-imperfect 91/100 on Lighthouse, with three concrete failures: insufficient background/foreground contrast, skip links that are not focusable, and touch targets that are too small or too close together. Those are real, fixable issues rather than structural ones, and they sit against genuine strengths — the app is localized in English and French, and the changelog shows hreflang (en/fr/x-default) wired through the sitemap. No accessibility statement or WCAG conformance claim was found, so keyboard and screen-reader behavior beyond the automated audit is unverified. On growth, the idea itself is the interesting part. The category is crowded — Bitwarden, 1Password, KeePass and Proton Pass are the named alternatives — and every one of them requires an account or email, or lacks decentralized sync. VaultKeepR's wedge is precise: no email, no registration, zero-knowledge, an on-chain Smart Account as identity, IPFS backup, open source and free forever, with paid tiers (€17.99–€69.99/yr) plus a €299 crypto-only lifetime plan aimed squarely at privacy and crypto buyers. That is a real differentiator, not a slogan, and it targets a segment the incumbents structurally cannot copy without abandoning their account-based models. The honest limit is audience size: the no-account, Web3-native crowd is a slice of the password-manager market, not the market, and enterprise/SSO is contact-only. Traction is early — domain registered March 2026, iOS listing first released April 2026, no store ratings yet — which is context, not a verdict on the idea.

Conclusion

The pitch is coherent and the execution mostly matches it. If you are the person who has wanted a password manager but refused to hand over an email address, VaultKeepR is one of the few products actually built for that, and the free tier is not a demo — it is the product. The decision point is trust: the architecture claims are strong and the transport security is verified, but the audit trail a security-conscious buyer would want is not published yet. Watch for a third-party audit, a bug bounty and a WCAG statement; those three additions would move this from promising to recommended without hesitation. Until then, it is a credible choice for the privacy-first crowd and a harder sell for anyone who needs compliance paperwork.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a third-party security audit or launch a bug bounty — the 'don't trust us, verify us' pitch needs external validation, not just acronyms.
Fix the three Lighthouse a11y failures: contrast on dark vault rows, focusable skip links, and larger touch targets.
Improve mobile LCP below 2.5s — desktop is 100/100 but the 3.5s mobile load is the weakest measured number.
Add an accessibility statement and WCAG conformance target, plus keyboard/screen-reader notes in the docs.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	VaultKeepR	Bitwarden	1Password	KeePass	Proton Pass
Account requirement	No email or account; on-chain Smart Account identity	Email account required for cloud sync	Account and email required	No account; local database file only	Proton account and email required
Open source	Yes — public repo with core packages and contracts	Yes — fully open source clients and server	No — proprietary, closed source	Yes — open source, community-maintained	Yes — open source clients
Encryption	Argon2id KDF + XChaCha20-Poly1305, zero-knowledge	PBKDF2/Argon2id + AES-256-CBC, zero-knowledge	PBKDF2 + AES-256-GCM with secret key, zero-knowledge	AES-256/ChaCha20 + Argon2, local database	Argon2 + AES-256-GCM, zero-knowledge
Biometric unlock	Yes — WebAuthn PRF passkeys, plus NFC backup keys	Yes — biometric unlock on mobile and desktop	Yes — biometric unlock across platforms	Limited — via plugins/derivatives, not native	Yes — biometric unlock on mobile
Decentralized / IPFS sync	Yes — encrypted vault on IPFS with smart-contract registry	No — centralized cloud or self-hosted server	No — centralized 1Password cloud	No — manual file sync (Dropbox, etc.)	No — centralized Proton cloud
Free tier	Free forever, unlimited items, no ads or tracking	Free tier with unlimited items and sync	No free tier — 14-day trial only	Completely free and open source	Free tier with limited aliases and items
Published third-party audit	None found in collected evidence	Yes — multiple third-party security audits	Yes — regular third-party audits and bug bounty	No formal audit; long public code review history	Yes — Proton publishes audits and runs a bounty