Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Free AI hairstyle changer: try on haircuts & colors insta...

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS and SPF in place, but CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, secure cookies and DMARC are all missing. No published audits or security page.

Screenshots

1 / 3

AI Hairstyle TryOn

About this app

AI Hairstyle TryOn is a web-based tool that uses artificial intelligence to let you preview different hairstyles and hair colors on your own photo in seconds. Whether you're considering a bold new cut, curious about a color change, or just want to have some fun, this app provides a realistic and instant makeover. With over 100 curated templates for both men and women, a custom reference upload feature, AI-powered recommendations based on your face shape, and even a text-to-hairstyle generator, it's like having a virtual salon at your fingertips. The free plan offers 1 credit per month with access to a great selection of templates, while premium plans provide more credits and higher resolution downloads. It's perfect for anyone planning a salon visit, stylists looking to communicate better with clients, content creators seeking engaging material, and anyone who loves experimenting with their look without commitment.

Key features

1100+ curated hairstyle templates for men and women, plus a custom reference upload that applies any hairstyle from a photo
2AI face-shape analysis with personalized hairstyle recommendations and a text-to-hairstyle generator
3AI hair color changer supporting natural and fantasy colors, with higher-resolution downloads on premium plans

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Individuals planning a salon visit

Pain points

Fear of regretting a haircut or color, difficulty communicating desired look to stylist

Primary needs

Preview hairstyles and colors on their own photo to make confident decisions

Demographic

Hair stylists and salon owners

Pain points

Miscommunication with clients leading to unsatisfactory results and wasted time

Primary needs

Visual tool to show clients realistic previews and reduce revision requests

Demographic

Social media creators and influencers

Pain points

Need for fresh, engaging content that resonates with audience

Primary needs

Create transformation videos and interactive content to boost engagement

Demographic

Cosplayers and performers

Pain points

High cost of wigs and trial-and-error with character looks

Primary needs

Plan character-accurate hairstyles and colors without expense

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

AI Hairstyle TryOn is a competent, clearly-scoped virtual try-on tool that does the core job well: upload a photo, pick a style, see a realistic result. The five-generator spread (template, custom, recommend, analyze, lookbook) is more than most competitors offer at this price point, and the custom reference upload is a genuine differentiator against L'Oréal's Style My Hair and YouCam. The landing page communicates the value fast with split-face imagery, even if it leans on repetitive card grids. The real weaknesses are mobile performance (5.9s LCP is rough), a thin security posture for a product handling face photos, and a free tier so stingy it barely functions as a trial. None of these are fatal — they're fixable — but they're the difference between 'interesting tool' and 'the one I'd actually recommend.'

Measure by measure

Usability

Five distinct generators (template, custom, recommend, analyze, lookbook) cover real use cases, and the phone mockup previews the post-generation UI. Free tier at 1 credit/month is thin for evaluating quality.

Design

Clean pastel palette and split-face before/after imagery communicate the value fast, but three near-identical 3x2 card grids and a dense gray hero paragraph make the page feel template-driven and repetitive.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 95/100 is genuinely snappy, but mobile drops to 68 with a 5.9s LCP and 4.0s FCP — the heavy hero imagery and split-face photos are punishing phone users.

Security

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 91/100 is solid, but three real failures remain: focusable elements inside aria-hidden containers, insufficient color contrast, and no main landmark. No WCAG statement published.

Growth

Real problem (haircut regret is universal), specific segments named (salon-goers, stylists, creators, cosplayers), and a custom-reference wedge the free alternatives don't match. Category is crowded but headroom exists.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 5.9s LCP and 68/100 Lighthouse score need image optimization and lazy-loading
Security headers: CSP, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, secure cookies, and DMARC all missing
Free tier is 1 credit/month — too thin to evaluate output quality before committing to a paid plan

Design & Usability

The homepage does the one thing that matters for a try-on tool: it shows split-face before/after imagery right under the hero, so you understand the product in under two seconds. The pastel card system is consistent and the phone mockup proves there's a real app behind the marketing. Where it slips is repetition — reviews, features, and benefits all render as the same 3x2 grid, so the page reads as one long template rather than a narrative. The hero description is a dense gray paragraph that most visitors will skip. On usability, five generators (template, custom, recommend, analyze, lookbook) is a genuinely useful spread and covers the main jobs-to-be-done. The free plan's 1 credit/month is the weak link: it's enough to see the product works, not enough to trust it before paying. A more generous first-run allowance would convert better than any testimonial card.

Speed & Security

Speed is a tale of two devices. Desktop Lighthouse lands at 95/100, which is genuinely fast. Mobile collapses to 68 with a 5.9s LCP and 4.0s FCP — the split-face hero images and gradient background are clearly not optimized for phones, and that's where most try-on traffic will come from. Fixing image formats and lazy-loading below-the-fold grids would likely push mobile into the 80s. Security is the weakest dimension. HTTPS and HSTS are in place and SPF is configured, but the header probe found no CSP, no frame protection, no X-Content-Type-Options, no Referrer-Policy, no Permissions-Policy, no secure cookie flag, and no DMARC. That's 5 of 13 checklist items. For a product that ingests user-uploaded face photos, the absence of a CSP and a published privacy/security page is a real gap, not just a checkbox miss. No SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty signals were found.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 91/100 on the automated Lighthouse audit, which is above average for an indie AI tool. Three real failures remain: focusable elements nested inside aria-hidden containers (a classic modal/dropdown bug), insufficient color contrast somewhere on the page, and a missing main landmark. None of these are catastrophic, but the aria-hidden issue will actively confuse screen reader users. There's no published WCAG statement, which is normal at this stage but worth adding. On growth, the idea holds up. Haircut regret is a real, universal, mildly emotional problem, and the product names specific segments — salon-goers, stylists, content creators, cosplayers — rather than pitching 'everyone.' The custom reference upload is the clearest wedge against YouCam and Style My Hair, which are template-bound. The category is crowded and the incumbents have brand and distribution, so the ceiling depends on whether the custom-reference and text-to-hairstyle features stay ahead. Domain is only ~0.4 years old and only Twitter is listed as a social channel, so traction is early.

Conclusion

If you're planning a salon visit and want to walk in with a reference instead of a vague gesture, this does the job. If you're a stylist trying to reduce revision requests, the custom reference feature is worth the premium tier on its own. What would move this from 'solid' to 'recommended' is straightforward: optimize the mobile hero images, publish a security/privacy page with a CSP, and loosen the free tier to at least 3-5 credits so people can actually evaluate output quality before paying. The bones are good. The polish is what's missing.

Suggestions for improvement

Optimize hero and split-face images for mobile — LCP 5.9s is costing you conversions on the device most users are on.
Add CSP, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and DMARC headers; publish a security/privacy page.
Increase free tier to 3-5 credits so users can evaluate output quality across multiple styles before paying.
Fix the aria-hidden focusable-descendant bug and the contrast failure; add a main landmark and a WCAG statement.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	AI Hairstyle TryOn	YouCam Makeup	Style My Hair	HairStyle Changer
Free tier allowance	1 credit per month with access to a selection of templates	Free app with in-app purchases; hairstyle try-on often gated behind premium	Free to use on L'Oréal's site with no credit system	Freemium with limited free generations before paywall
Custom reference hairstyle upload	Yes — upload any reference image and AI applies the hairstyle to your photo	Primarily template-based; custom reference not a core feature	Template-based only; no custom reference upload	Template-based; custom reference not advertised
AI face-shape analysis & recommendations	Yes — analyzes face shape, hair color, and style compatibility with personalized recommendations	Yes — face analysis for makeup and style suggestions	Limited — style suggestions but no deep face-shape analysis	Basic AI suggestions; face-shape analysis not a headline feature
Hair color changer	Yes — natural and fantasy colors including blonde, red, purple, pink	Yes — hair color simulation as part of broader makeup suite	Yes — L'Oréal hair color try-on tied to their product line	Yes — AI-powered color changing on uploaded photos
Text-to-hairstyle generator	Yes — describe your dream look in text and AI generates the style	No — template and preset based	No — template based	No — template based
Platform availability	Web-based only	iOS, Android, and web	Web-based on L'Oréal's site	Web-based