Usability74Design71Speed88Security76Accessibility78Growth62

Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

CitableReport is an AI visibility audit:

Growth

62

Real, growing problem — buyers now ask assistants instead of searching. The $9 one-off 40-check audit with evidence and free re-checks is a specific, cheap wedge, though the category is crowding fast.

Screenshots

1 / 1

About this app

CitableReport checks whether AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity can find, read and quote your website. More people now ask an assistant instead of searching, and each answer names only a handful of sources. CitableReport reads your site the way their crawlers do and runs 40 checks: whether AI crawlers are let in, whether pages answer questions clearly, whether facts are specific and sourced, and whether it’s clear who is behind the site. You get one score out of 100, with the evidence behind every result. The full report lists every problem in order of importance, with an example of the fix.

Key features

  • 1Free AI Visibility Score in ~60 seconds with no signup, from a single domain input.
  • 240 checks across five layers: crawl/access, content structure, fact density, entity/trust, measurement.
  • 3Full report for US$9 once, including two free re-checks within 60 days to verify fixes.
  • 4Prioritized fix list with evidence found on your site and an example of each fix.
  • 5Dated, authored guides on AI visibility, AI crawlers and tracking brand mentions.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

CitableReport is a focused, fast, well-explained AI visibility auditor. It reads your site the way AI crawlers do, runs 40 checks across crawl/access, content structure, fact density, entity/trust and measurement, and returns one score with evidence and prioritized fixes. The free 60-second score with no signup is a smart funnel, and the $9 one-off report with two free re-checks is priced to remove friction. Design is cohesive but template-adjacent; accessibility passes automated checks but lacks a published statement; security is solid minus SPF. Growth hinges on whether a cheap, specific audit can hold ground in a crowded 'AI visibility' category.

Measure by measure

Usability

74

One input, one CTA, free score in 60 seconds, no signup — the path to value is about as short as it gets. Dated, authored guides add real depth for a technical buyer.

Design

71

Cohesive blue line-illustration branding and a color-coded five-layer score card give the page real hierarchy. The flat beige background and dense paragraphs keep it from feeling premium.

Speed

88

Lighthouse 98/100 on both mobile and desktop, LCP 1.0s, CLS 0.007, TBT 161ms. Genuinely fast, with no lag complaints in the collected evidence.

Security

76

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Permissions-Policy and secure cookies — 12/13 probe points. SPF is missing and no SOC 2/ISO claims are published.

Accessibility

78

Lighthouse accessibility 100/100 on automated checks, with readable contrast and a keyboard-friendly single-input flow. No WCAG statement or multi-language support published.

Growth

62

Real, growing problem — buyers now ask assistants instead of searching. The $9 one-off 40-check audit with evidence and free re-checks is a specific, cheap wedge, though the category is crowding fast.

Improvement areas

  • No published accessibility statement or WCAG conformance claim behind the 100/100 automated score.
  • Missing SPF record; no SOC 2, ISO or pen-test documentation for buyers handing over a domain.
  • Homepage relies on dense paragraphs and a flat beige background; no real sample report shown.
  • Single-language (English) only; no multi-language support for international sites.

Design & Usability

CitableReport's homepage does the hard part well: it explains a fuzzy concept (AI citation visibility) with a concrete five-layer score card, a clear SEO-vs-AI-visibility comparison table, and a single domain input that gets you a free score in about a minute with no signup. The blue line-illustration system is consistent and the numbered crawl/score/fix steps give a technical buyer a mental model before they scroll. Where it slips is craft: the beige background reads template-adjacent, and the long explanatory paragraphs under 'What is an AI citation report?' are dense blocks with no visual breaks. The dated, authored guides are a genuine usability strength — they answer the questions a skeptical buyer asks before paying.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout: Lighthouse 98/100 on both mobile and desktop, LCP 1.0s, CLS 0.007, TBT 161ms — the page loads essentially instantly, and there are no lag complaints in the collected evidence. Security is strong for the stage: HTTPS enforced with HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy and secure cookies, hitting 12 of 13 probe points. The one gap is a missing SPF record, and there are no published SOC 2, ISO or pen-test claims — normal for a young $9 tool, but worth noting for anyone handing over a domain.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 100/100 on the Lighthouse axe-core audit, with readable contrast and a keyboard-friendly single-input flow — but that's automated coverage only, and there's no WCAG conformance statement or multi-language support to point to. Growth is the interesting question: the problem is real and growing (buyers increasingly ask ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity instead of searching), the target is specific (site owners who want to be the source an assistant quotes), and the $9 one-off with two free re-checks is a genuinely cheap wedge against subscription-priced competitors. The limit is defensibility — 40 checks are copyable, and the category is filling up fast.

Conclusion

If you run a content site and want a fast, cheap read on whether AI assistants can actually find and quote you, CitableReport is a low-risk place to start — the free score costs you a domain and a minute. Pay the $9 only if the free score surfaces problems you care about, and use the two re-checks to verify your fixes actually moved the number. Don't treat the score as gospel; treat the prioritized fix list as the product.

Suggestions for improvement

  • Publish a short accessibility statement and WCAG conformance target to back up the 100/100 automated score.
  • Add an SPF record to complete the email-authentication picture alongside the existing DMARC.
  • Break up the long paragraphs under 'What is an AI citation report?' with subheads, callouts or a short video.
  • Show a real (anonymized) sample report on the site so buyers see the evidence and fix examples before paying.
How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

CitableReport
Free entry pointFree AI Visibility Score in ~60s, no signupNot specified in provided details
Pricing modelUS$9 one-off full report + two free re-checksNot specified in provided details
Depth of audit40 checks across 5 layers with evidence per resultNot specified in provided details
Re-check / verificationTwo free re-checks within 60 days, page-by-page diffNot specified in provided details

Comparing options? See CitableReport alternatives, scored side by side

View all SEO Tools
Scout Forge

A platform dedicated to providing unbiased reviews of newly launched applications, analyzing everything from their features to their full potential.

info@scoutforge.net

© 2026 Scoutforge. All rights reserved.

CitableReport Review | Scout Forge