Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

See who ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude recommend instead of you...

Growth

Real, named problem with a specific wedge: a €39 one-off report against subscription trackers, across three models, with a prioritized to-do list. Clear segments, clear deliverable — but the wedge is a price point, not a moat.

Screenshots

1 / 4

Askray

About this app

Askray is an AI visibility and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tool that asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude the questions your customers actually type, then shows you which companies those assistants name, the searches behind the answers, and where you stand in comparison. A free preview scan queries ChatGPT, while the €39 one-off full report (no subscription) runs thousands of prompts across all three assistants and aggregates results from 2,000+ sources. You get a clear picture of every competitor AI recommends and the reasons it gives, the real questions people ask and which ones your site leaves unanswered, the trusted sites AI reads before recommending anyone, and a prioritized to-do list so you can climb into the answer. It's a focused, no-fluff way for marketers, founders and SEO teams to understand and improve their presence inside AI-generated recommendations—an emerging channel that traditional rank tracking simply doesn't measure.

Key features

1Free preview scan runs ~20 ChatGPT searches against your domain with no account or card required
2€39 one-off full report: 350+ prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, aggregating 2,000+ sources, no subscription
3Shows every competitor AI recommends, the reasons it gives, and the real questions customers ask that your site leaves unanswered
4Identifies the trusted sites AI reads before recommending anyone, plus a prioritized to-do list to climb into the answer

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

B2B SaaS and tech marketing leaders (heads of growth, demand gen)

Pain points

Traditional SEO rankings look healthy but AI assistants never name the brand; no data on the AI-driven buyer journey

Primary needs

Visibility into which competitors AI recommends, the prompts behind it, and a clear action plan to get cited

Demographic

Small business owners and local service providers

Pain points

Customers increasingly ask AI for recommendations; owner has no idea if—or how often—they appear and can't afford agency retainers

Primary needs

Affordable, one-off audit revealing AI mentions, missing content, and trusted sites to target for listings

Demographic

SEO consultants and digital marketing agencies

Pain points

Clients now demand 'AI SEO' / GEO reporting; existing rank-trackers don't measure LLM answers or source citations

Primary needs

Multi-model (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) benchmark reports and competitive intelligence to add as a service line

Demographic

Startup founders and e-commerce brand managers

Pain points

Losing high-intent discovery traffic to AI answer engines and unaware which pages AI sources cite

Primary needs

Competitive gap analysis, the exact customer questions asked, and prioritized fixes to win AI recommendations

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Askray is a Generative Engine Optimization audit tool that asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude the questions your customers actually type, then shows you which companies get named instead of you. The free preview runs about 20 ChatGPT searches; the €39 one-off full report runs 350+ across all three models and aggregates 2,000+ sources, with no subscription. The pitch is aimed at B2B SaaS marketers, SMB owners, SEO agencies and founders who suspect AI assistants are quietly routing buyers elsewhere. Execution is above average for the stage: a fast, well-typed dark landing page, a genuinely readable report UI, a no-account free scan and a shareable report link. The rough edges are cosmetic and fixable — a broken verification widget, a weak secondary button, no scan progress state. Security and accessibility are competent rather than certified. The real question is durability: the €39 one-off is a great wedge against subscription trackers, but it's a pricing decision, not a moat.

Measure by measure

Usability

No account, no card, shareable report link, an example report and a side-by-side free-vs-paid table — the path to value is short and honest. The free/paid toggle appears before you type a domain, and the scan button gives no progress feedback.

Design

Dark, disciplined landing page with strong type hierarchy and a genuinely readable report UI — color-coded tags and progress bars instead of raw numbers. Undone by a broken Cloudflare checkbox and a low-contrast free-scan button.

Speed

Lighthouse 99 mobile / 100 desktop, LCP 2.1s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms. A static marketing page with one form field, and it loads like it. Nothing to complain about and nothing to fix.

Security

HSTS, CSP, frame protection and Referrer-Policy all set, SPF and DMARC published, 9/12 header checks. HTTPS enforcement wasn't confirmed by the probe and Permissions-Policy is missing. No SOC 2, ISO or pen-test claims.

Accessibility

Perfect 100/100 on the automated Lighthouse audit, plus the site ships in English, Finnish and Swedish. No public WCAG conformance statement, so the automated score is doing all the talking.

Growth

Improvement areas

Broken Cloudflare human-verification widget renders as a gray bar directly above the primary CTA
No loading or progress feedback on the scan button during a multi-minute scan
No security page, SOC 2, ISO or pen-test documentation for agencies reselling reports
One-off pricing means no re-scan or monitoring tier to show movement over time

Design & Usability

The homepage is a properly built dark-theme landing page: near-black background, blue accents, Inter type, a 48-56px hero that says exactly what the product does, and a free-vs-paid comparison table that lays out 20 searches on one model versus 350+ across three. The report UI shown in the screenshots is the better half — color-coded tags and progress bars instead of a wall of numbers, sortable columns, clear section headers. The problems are small and specific: the Cloudflare human-verification widget renders as a broken gray bar right above the main CTA, the free-scan button is tiny and low-contrast next to the bright blue primary, and a faint globe illustration sits behind the form doing nothing but competing for attention. Usability-wise the funnel is honest — no account, no card, shareable link, an example report you can read before paying — but the free/paid choice lands before you've typed a domain, and the scan button gives zero progress feedback after you click it.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout: Lighthouse 99 on mobile and 100 on desktop, LCP 2.1s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms. It's a static marketing page with one input, and it behaves like one — there's genuinely nothing to fix here. Security is solid-but-unremarkable for the stage. The probe found HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy all set, plus SPF and DMARC published, for 9 of 12 checklist points. HTTPS enforcement wasn't confirmed and Permissions-Policy is absent. Payment runs through a third-party checkout for the €39, so no card data touches the site — a sensible choice for a one-person operation. What's missing is the paperwork: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no pen-test summary, no security page. For a €39 one-off audit tool that's a reasonable place to be, but agencies reselling this to clients will eventually ask for something on letterhead.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores a clean 100/100 on the automated Lighthouse audit, and the site is localized into English, Finnish and Swedish — a real signal, not a checkbox. The caveat is that automated axe checks cover roughly a third of WCAG; there's no accessibility statement, no documented keyboard or screen-reader testing, so the perfect score is a floor, not a ceiling. Growth is the interesting one. The problem is real and specific: SEO dashboards look healthy while ChatGPT recommends three competitors instead of you, and traditional rank trackers cannot see it. The wedge is sharp — a €39 one-off report with no subscription, covering ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude, delivering competitor names, the actual prompts, the sources AI trusts, and a prioritized to-do list. Against Profound's enterprise positioning, Otterly's monitoring subscriptions and Peec's analytics, that's a genuinely different shape of product aimed at people who want an answer, not a dashboard. The limit: a price point is copyable, and the underlying data is rented from the same models everyone else queries. The domain is brand new, so there's no traction to point at — the idea has room, the moat does not yet.

Conclusion

If you've ever asked ChatGPT for 'the best tool for X' and watched it name three companies that aren't yours, this is the cheapest way to find out how bad it is and what to do about it. The €39 one-off is the right shape for a first purchase — no subscription commitment, a concrete deliverable, and a to-do list you can hand to a content team on Monday. What it isn't yet is a system: one scan is a snapshot, and AI answers drift week to week. The obvious next move is a cheap re-scan or a light monitoring tier, because a customer who buys once and sees the numbers move will pay again. Fix the Cloudflare widget, add a spinner, publish a security page, and this is a genuinely useful tool with a clear reason to exist.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the Cloudflare verification widget — it renders as a broken gray bar directly above your primary CTA and is the first thing a visitor sees fail.
Add a visible progress or loading state to the scan button; a multi-minute scan with no feedback reads as a dead click.
Publish a short security page covering data handling, retention and where payment is processed — agencies reselling this will ask.
Offer a discounted re-scan or a light monitoring tier; a one-off snapshot can't show the movement that makes the product worth repeating.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Askray	Profound	Otterly.AI	Peec AI
Pricing model	€39 one-off full report, no subscription; free preview scan	Enterprise subscription, custom/sales-led pricing	Monthly subscription tiers	Monthly subscription tiers
AI models queried	ChatGPT (free scan); ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude (full report)	Multiple LLMs tracked continuously	ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and other LLM engines	Multiple generative engines with competitor benchmarking
Monitoring over time	No — single one-off snapshot per purchase	Yes — continuous tracking with analytics workflows	Yes — ongoing brand mention and citation monitoring	Yes — recurring visibility insights versus competitors
Actionable output	Prioritized to-do list, unanswered questions, trusted sites to target for listings	Optimization workflows and analytics dashboards	Visibility tracking and citation monitoring	Actionable visibility insights versus competitors
Target customer	SMB owners, B2B SaaS marketers, SEO agencies, founders wanting a cheap one-off audit	Enterprise brands with dedicated AI-search programs	Marketing teams wanting ongoing AI search monitoring	Brands and agencies benchmarking AI answer share

Profound

Enterprise-grade AI search visibility platform that tracks how brands appear in AI answers across multiple LLMs, with analytics and optimization workflows.

Otterly.AI

AI search monitoring tool that tracks brand mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and other LLM-powered engines.

Peec AI

Generative engine optimization analytics that shows how often your brand shows up in AI answers versus competitors, with actionable visibility insights.

Comparing options? See Askray alternatives, scored side by side

View all Marketing & Sales