Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

named.ae asks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok your buyers' questions live, and shows who they name and the pages they read.

Usability

Free scan is frictionless to understand: 25 answers, 2-3 minutes, no card, repeated CTAs. Pricing is explicit per tier. Missing a highlighted recommended plan and richer in-product docs beyond the GEO guide.

Screenshots

1 / 3

named.ae

About this app

When a buyer asks ChatGPT for a business like yours, it names a short list. named.ae shows you whether your brand is on it. Enter your website. named.ae writes the questions your buyers ask, then asks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok live. You see every answer word for word, the brands named instead of you, and the pages each AI read. The same questions are also checked on Google search, so you see both side by side. The free scan asks 5 questions on all 5 AI platforms, 25 answers in all. You get a score out of 100 and your first 3 moves. Paid plans scan every week and give a Weekly Action Plan: the pages to publish, the sites to be listed on, the fixes to make. On a paid plan, the next weekly scan shows whether the AI platforms picked up the changes. All 5 AI platforms are on every plan, with no per-platform fees. Agencies can track 5 client brands and send reports that carry their agency name, with named.ae beside it.

Key features

1Live scans across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok with every answer shown word for word
2Weekly Action Plan naming pages to publish, sites to get listed on, and fixes to make
3Google search checked side by side with AI answers; agency tier with branded client share links

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Marketing teams

Pain points

AI platforms name competitors instead of them

Primary needs

See who ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok name, and what to fix

Demographic

Marketing agencies and SEO agencies

Pain points

Need to see what AI platforms say about client brands

Primary needs

Track 5 client brands and send reports with their agency name

Demographic

Owners of service businesses

Pain points

Not sure if ChatGPT names their business

Primary needs

A free scan: 25 live answers in 2 to 3 minutes, no card

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

named.ae is a focused AI-visibility scanner with a genuinely good demo-first landing page, a fast site and a clean security posture. It asks your buyers' questions of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok live, shows every answer word for word, names the competitors cited instead, and turns it into a weekly Action Plan. The free scan (25 answers, no card) is a smart wedge, and the agency tier with branded reports is well-aimed. Weaknesses: thin documentation, no compliance certifications, no accessibility statement, and a crowded competitive field. The execution is above-average for its stage; the differentiation is real but not yet defensible.

Measure by measure

Usability

Design

Clean, current landing page with a single orange accent driving hierarchy and a convincing live report preview. Cramped hero spacing and inconsistent dark-mode marketing cards keep it short of excellent.

Speed

Lighthouse 100/100 on both mobile and desktop, LCP 1.5s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms. Genuinely fast, no complaints found. Sits at the top of the measured band.

Security

Full security header stack (HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Permissions-Policy), secure cookies, SPF and DMARC, 13/13 checklist. No published SOC 2, ISO or pen-test claim found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 100/100 with readable contrast and clean semantics. No WCAG statement or multi-language support found, so it sits mid-band rather than at the top.

Growth

Real, well-named problem (AI omits you from the answer), a concrete multi-platform wedge, and a specific agency segment. Category has headroom; the risk is funded peers moving faster.

Improvement areas

No SOC 2, ISO 27001 or published penetration test despite handling client brand data
Documentation is thin beyond one GEO explainer; no accessibility statement or WCAG claim
Pricing tiers lack a highlighted recommended plan and cross-tier comparison table

Design & Usability

named.ae's homepage does the hard thing well: it shows the product instead of describing it. The live report preview — a 23/100 score, per-platform dot rows, a competitor bar chart — communicates the entire value proposition in one card. A single orange accent carries hierarchy across CTAs, scores and highlights, and the free-scan offer is stated three times with the right reassurances ('2 to 3 minutes', 'no card'). The cracks are small but real: the hero input crowds the AI pill row, the dark-mode marketing cards feel like a different design system, and the long feature checklist under the report preview is set in type too small to scan. On usability, the free scan is frictionless to understand and pricing is explicit per tier, but there's no highlighted recommended plan and the documentation beyond one GEO explainer is thin.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout: Lighthouse returns 100/100 on both mobile and desktop, with LCP 1.5s, CLS 0 and TBT 0ms. Whatever stack this runs on, it's lean, and there are no lag complaints in the collected evidence. Security is solid on the mechanics — HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy all present, secure cookies set, SPF and DMARC configured, a clean 13/13 on the header checklist. What's missing is the paperwork buyers increasingly ask for: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no published penetration test or bug bounty. For an early-stage tool handling client brand data that's understandable, but it caps the score below the top of the band.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 100/100 on Lighthouse's automated audit, with readable contrast and clean semantics on the live page — but automated checks cover only part of WCAG, and there's no accessibility statement, no WCAG conformance claim and no multi-language support in the collected content, so it lands mid-band rather than at the ceiling. Growth is the more interesting question. The problem named is real and specific: buyers now ask ChatGPT first, and the answer names two or three brands, not ten links. named.ae's wedge is concrete — all five AI platforms on every plan, no per-platform fees, a weekly Action Plan rather than just a dashboard, and Google checked side by side. The agency tier with branded share links targets a genuinely underserved segment. The category is young with visible headroom, but funded peers like Profound and AthenaHQ are chasing the same buyers, and the $149-$499 pricing sits in a crowded middle.

Conclusion

If you're a marketing team or agency that suspects AI platforms are naming your competitors and not you, the free scan is a genuinely low-risk way to find out — 25 live answers in a couple of minutes, no card. The paid tiers make sense if you want weekly tracking and the Action Plan, and the agency plan's branded share links are a real differentiator. Go in knowing the category is crowded and the compliance paperwork isn't there yet. For the price of a couple of hours of an SEO consultant, it's a reasonable bet.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a SOC 2 roadmap or at least a security page detailing data handling and retention
Add an accessibility statement and WCAG conformance target to back the 100/100 audit
Highlight a recommended pricing tier and add a feature comparison table across plans
Expand documentation beyond the GEO guide: setup, question authoring, and report interpretation

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	named.ae	Profound	AthenaHQ	Peec AI	Otterly.AI
AI platforms monitored	ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok (all 5 on every plan)	Multiple AI chatbots and search engines	Generative AI answer engines	AI search visibility tracking	AI search visibility tracking
Free tier / trial	Free scan: 5 questions × 5 platforms = 25 answers, no card	Demo/trial available	Trial available	Not verified	Not verified
Entry paid price	$149/mo Starter (1 brand, weekly scans)	Enterprise/custom pricing	Tiered subscription	Not verified	Not verified
Actionable recommendations	Weekly Action Plan: pages to publish, sites to list on, fixes	Optimization insights	Optimization insights	Not verified	Not verified
Agency / multi-brand support	Agency $499/mo: 5 brands, 10 seats, branded share links	Agency/enterprise plans	Multi-brand support	Not verified	Not verified