Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Turn screen annotations and voice notes into complete tic...

Growth

A real, specific pain — feedback scattered across Looms, screenshots, and vague Jira tickets — with a genuine wedge: auto-generated specs exported to Jira/Linear/Notion. Early stage (domain ~0.2 years), so the idea carries it, not traction.

Screenshots

1 / 6

Dhamark

About this app

Dhamark is a Chrome extension that transforms how teams capture and communicate feedback, bugs, and feature requests. Instead of scattering screenshots, Loom videos, and vague Slack messages, Dhamark lets you mark up any live web app, record voice notes, and automatically generate structured tickets with user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and even API sketches. The tool is built for product managers, QA engineers, agencies, engineering managers, business analysts, and founders who need to turn messy feedback into build-ready specs without manual writing. Dhamark captures repro steps as you click through the app, redacts sensitive data before sending anything, and exports directly to Jira, Linear, or Notion with one click. It also integrates with GitHub to suggest real file paths and branches, and offers AI-generated subtasks, story points, and design references. With a free tier (25 tickets/month) and a Pro plan at $19/month, Dhamark is a cost-effective way to eliminate ...

Key features

1Mark up any live web app with boxes, numbered pins, and per-region voice notes to capture exact feedback context.
2Auto-generates structured tickets — user story, acceptance criteria, edge cases with severity, and API sketch — from voice annotations.
3One-click export to Jira, Linear, or Notion with annotated screenshots attached; GitHub integration suggests file paths and branches.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Product Managers

Pain points

Recording Looms nobody watches; rewriting stakeholder notes; Jira tickets that say 'see screenshot above'.

Primary needs

Turn stakeholder calls into build-ready tickets without manual writing after meetings.

Demographic

QA Engineers

Pain points

Filing bugs with 'it looks wrong'; chasing devs for repro steps; hours lost writing structured reports.

Primary needs

Capture exact screen region, voice expected vs actual, and generate complete bug reports with repro steps and severity.

Demographic

Agencies & Client Teams

Pain points

Translating client voice notes, WhatsApp messages, and scattered screenshots into sprint tasks manually.

Primary needs

Provide structured tickets with subtasks, story points, and specs from client input.

Demographic

Engineering Managers

Pain points

Manually estimating story points; breaking epics into subtasks; vague specs requiring follow-up calls.

Primary needs

Receive tickets already broken into estimated subtasks with priority, so sprint planning starts from a sized backlog.

Demographic

Business Analysts

Pain points

Turning workshop notes and walkthrough recordings into requirements by hand; chasing stakeholders for clarification.

Primary needs

Capture flow once while recording, with every requirement landing with steps, acceptance criteria, and edge cases.

Demographic

Founders & Non-technical Teams

Pain points

Seeing what's wrong but not knowing technical terms; bug reports come back with 'can you share repro steps?'.

Primary needs

Point and describe in plain words, and get technical half (repro steps, AC, edge cases) written automatically.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Dhamark is a Chrome extension that turns marked-up screens and voice notes into structured, exportable tickets — user story, acceptance criteria, edge cases, API sketch — pushed straight into Jira, Linear, or Notion. The pitch is sharp and the problem is real: feedback dies between the demo and the ticket, and engineers build what they understood rather than what was meant. The landing page sells this well, the product is fast (Lighthouse 90 mobile / 99 desktop), and the free tier plus $19/month Pro keeps it accessible. The weaknesses are equally clear: a truncated-feeling homepage, no visible docs or live demo, missing CSP and Permissions-Policy headers, no published compliance certifications, and a single color-contrast accessibility failure. It's a competent, well-positioned early-stage tool with a genuine differentiator and a thin moat.

Measure by measure

Usability

The 3-step Capture → Describe → Export flow is explained clearly and the free tier plus no-credit-card Pro trial keeps friction low. But there's no visible help center or live demo, so onboarding depth beyond the marketing page is unverified.

Design

Dark theme with a disciplined purple accent and a sharp hero headline. The Chrome side-panel and timeline mockups sell the workflow well, but a near-empty below-the-fold block and low-contrast hero body text drag it down.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 90/100 and desktop 99/100, with CLS 0 and TBT 23ms — a genuinely stable, snappy page. LCP 3.2s on mobile is the one soft spot, but nothing here suggests lag complaints.

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, SPF and DMARC — 9/12 probe points. Missing CSP and Permissions-Policy, and no SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty published, which is typical for this stage.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 96/100 with only a color-contrast failure. No a11y statement or WCAG claim, and no multi-language support, but the automated baseline is strong and the dark theme is mostly readable.

Growth

Improvement areas

No public help center, docs site, or live demo — onboarding depth beyond the marketing page is unverified.
Missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy headers; no published SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty for a screen-and-voice capture tool.
Homepage below-the-fold renders as near-empty black space and hero body text fails color-contrast, per the visual and accessibility audits.

Design & Usability

Dhamark's landing page is a confident, dark-themed pitch with a purple accent and a headline that actually says what the product does: 'Record the feedback. Export the spec.' The Chrome side-panel and session-timeline mockups do more selling than most demo videos, showing the annotation-plus-voice workflow without needing a signup. The 3-step Capture → Describe → Export flow is legible at a glance, and the free tier (25 tickets/month) plus a no-credit-card Pro trial keeps the on-ramp cheap. Where it stumbles: a near-empty below-the-fold block that reads as unfinished, small low-contrast hero body text, and no visible help center or live demo. The marketing page is stronger than the documentation behind it, which is a problem the moment a user hits an edge case the homepage didn't cover.

Speed & Security

Speed is a genuine strength. Lighthouse scores 90/100 on mobile and 99/100 on desktop, with CLS 0 and TBT 23ms — the page is stable and doesn't jank while loading. The only soft metric is a 3.2s mobile LCP, which is acceptable but not elite. Security sits in solid-but-unremarkable territory: HTTPS is enforced with HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, SPF and DMARC all present, landing 9 of 12 probe points. The gaps are a missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy, plus no published SOC 2, ISO certification, or bug bounty. For a tool that captures screen regions, voice notes, and potentially sensitive app data, a CSP and a clear data-handling page would be the obvious next step — especially given the product's own redaction feature implies it knows data sensitivity matters.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 96/100 on Lighthouse with a single failing audit: insufficient color contrast. That's a fixable, specific flaw rather than a systemic one, but it's ironic on a dark theme the team designed themselves. There's no accessibility statement, no WCAG conformance claim, and no multi-language support, so the automated baseline is strong while the documented commitment is absent. Growth is a judgement on the idea, not the traction. Dhamark names a real, expensive problem — feedback scattered across Looms, screenshots, Slack threads, and Jira tickets that say 'see screenshot above' — and targets it at PMs, QA, agencies, and founders with a specific wedge: auto-generated user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and API sketches exported to Jira, Linear, or Notion. Against Loom (video only), Marker.io (visual feedback), and Userback (annotations), the structured-spec generation is a real differentiator. The limit is that Jira, Linear, and Notion are all racing to add AI ticket generation natively, and the domain is only ~0.2 years old with a single LinkedIn profile as its public footprint. The wedge is real; the moat is thin.

Conclusion

Dhamark is worth a look if your team's feedback currently lives in a graveyard of Looms nobody watches and Jira tickets that say 'see screenshot above.' The core loop — mark the screen, say what you mean, get a build-ready spec — is exactly the kind of unglamorous workflow fix that saves real hours. But go in with eyes open: there's no help center, no live demo, no SOC 2, and the below-the-fold homepage looks like someone ran out of Friday. Try the free tier on one real sprint before you commit the team. If the generated specs hold up against your actual tickets, the $19/month is a rounding error. If they don't, you've lost an afternoon and gained a very specific opinion about AI-generated acceptance criteria.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a real help center or docs site — the homepage currently does all the explaining, and it won't scale past the first edge case.
Add a Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy header, and publish a data-handling page given the product captures screen regions and voice.
Fix the below-the-fold black void on the homepage and raise hero body-text contrast — the visual audit flagged both.
Ship a live interactive demo or sandbox so prospects can try the annotation-to-spec flow without installing the extension first.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Dhamark	Loom	Marker.io	Userback
Structured ticket generation (user story, acceptance criteria, edge cases)	Yes — auto-generates user story, AC, edge cases with severity, and API sketch from voice annotations	No — video messaging only; no structured spec generation	No — visual feedback and bug reports, but no auto-generated user stories or acceptance criteria	No — collects annotated visual feedback but does not generate user stories or acceptance criteria
Direct export to Jira, Linear, or Notion	Yes — one-click export to Jira, Linear, and Notion with annotated screenshot attached	No — shares video links; no native tracker export	Yes — integrates with Jira, Trello, and other project management tools	Yes — integrates with project management tools for feedback forwarding
Voice annotation per marked region	Yes — record a voice note per annotated region, transcribed into the spec	Yes — screen and voice recording, but not tied to specific marked regions	No — text comments and annotations, no per-region voice notes	No — visual annotations and screenshots, no voice-note capture
Automatic repro-step capture while clicking through the app	Yes — captures repro steps as you click through the live app	Partial — records the screen, but steps are not extracted as structured repro	Partial — captures console logs and environment data with bug reports	Partial — captures session and browser context with feedback
Free tier availability	Yes — free tier with 25 tickets/month; Pro at $19/month, no credit card required	Yes — free plan with limited video recordings and duration	Yes — free trial; paid plans for ongoing use	Yes — free plan with limited feedback submissions
GitHub integration for file paths and branches	Yes — integrates with GitHub to suggest real file paths and branches	No — no GitHub integration	Partial — issue sync with trackers, not code-path suggestion	No — no GitHub code-path integration

Loom

Video messaging tool for capturing screen and voice, but lacks structured ticket generation and direct export to project trackers.

Marker.io

Visual feedback and bug reporting tool that integrates with Jira, Trello, etc., but focuses more on website feedback than full spec generation.

Userback

Collects visual feedback with annotations and screenshots, integrates with project management tools, but does not generate user stories or acceptance criteria automatically.

Comparing options? See Dhamark alternatives, scored side by side

View all Development & Engineering