Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

AI visibility tracker that checks if ChatGPT recommends y...

Usability

Clear three-step explanation and FAQ, but no self-serve signup—onboarding requires a 30-minute demo, which adds friction for potential users.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Fenn

About this app

Fenn is an AI visibility monitoring tool that reveals whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Grok recommend your business in their answers. The platform asks the five major AI assistants the exact questions your customers ask, then shows you how often (or how rarely) your brand appears. When you're consistently left out of AI answers, Fenn drafts website fixes and new pages designed to close those gaps—but nothing changes without your explicit approval. Every draft explains why it exists, and facts only you can verify are flagged rather than invented. Built for individual businesses and agencies alike, Fenn offers tiered pricing based on the number of websites tracked, from a single site at $29/month up to 25 client sites at $199/month for agencies. Each plan includes tracked prompts, visibility reporting, and the ability to approve and publish fixes directly. In the emerging world of answer engine optimization, Fenn gives you a way to see how AI shapes your first impressi...

Key features

1Tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok.
2Drafts website fixes and new pages with approval workflow.
3Flags facts only you can verify, preventing AI hallucinations.
4Multi-client dashboard for agencies with reports and CSV exports.
5MCP access and team invites on all plans.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Small business owners (physio clinics, local services, SaaS startups) marketing on a budget

Pain points

AI assistants like ChatGPT recommend competitors but never mention their business

Primary needs

Simple, affordable AI visibility monitoring and easy-to-approve website fixes

Demographic

Digital marketing managers at growing brands

Pain points

No visibility into how AI answer engines describe or recommend the company

Primary needs

Data-backed insights across multiple AI platforms and actionable content recommendations

Demographic

Marketing agencies managing multiple client websites

Pain points

Struggling to prove ROI on AI SEO and track client visibility at scale

Primary needs

Multi-client dashboard, white-label reports, and scalable AI visibility tracking

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Fenn is a promising AI visibility monitoring tool with a clean design, fast performance, and a clear value proposition. It differentiates itself by drafting website fixes that require explicit approval, and it flags facts only you can verify. However, the lack of self-serve signup and missing security certifications may hinder adoption. The pricing is competitive, and the agency tier is a smart move. Overall, Fenn is a solid entry in a crowded space, but it needs to reduce onboarding friction and bolster security transparency to stand out.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear three-step explanation and FAQ, but no self-serve signup—onboarding requires a 30-minute demo, which adds friction for potential users.

Design

Clean, modern landing page with a clear value proposition and an interactive example workspace. Branding is consistent and professional, though somewhat generic.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile performance 96/100, desktop 100/100. LCP 1.8s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms. The site is fast and lightweight.

Security

HTTPS enforced with HSTS and several security headers, but missing CSP and DMARC. No public security page or compliance certifications found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility score 100/100. Site is responsive and uses clear headings, but no explicit WCAG statement or multi-language support.

Growth

Addresses a real, growing need: AI visibility. Differentiated by approval-based fixes, but faces competition from Profound, Peec AI, and Otterly.AI. No self-serve signup may slow adoption.

Improvement areas

No self-serve signup; onboarding requires a demo call.
Missing security certifications (SOC 2, ISO) and public security page.
No white-label reports for agencies, despite agency tier.
No scheduled checks or keyword research yet (in development).

Design & Usability

Fenn's design is clean and modern, with a clear hero message and an interactive example workspace that effectively demonstrates the product. The three-step 'How it works' section and FAQ aid understanding. However, usability is hampered by the lack of self-serve signup—onboarding requires booking a 30-minute demo, which adds friction. The pricing page is transparent about what's included and what's not yet available, which is a plus. Overall, the design is above average, but the onboarding flow could be smoother for a product targeting small businesses and agencies.

Speed & Security

Speed is a standout: Lighthouse scores of 96/100 on mobile and 100/100 on desktop, with LCP 1.8s and zero CLS. The site loads fast and feels snappy. Security is solid but not exceptional: HTTPS is enforced with HSTS and several headers, but CSP and DMARC are missing. There's no public security page or compliance certifications, which may concern agencies handling client data. For a tool that accesses website data, more transparency around security practices would be reassuring.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores a perfect 100/100 on Lighthouse, and the site is responsive with clear headings. However, there's no explicit WCAG statement or multi-language support, which could limit reach. Growth potential is strong: Fenn addresses a real and growing problem—AI assistants recommending competitors instead of your business. The approval-based fix workflow is a differentiator, and pricing is competitive. But competition from Profound, Peec AI, and Otterly.AI is fierce, and the lack of self-serve signup may slow adoption. The idea has room to grow, especially with the agency tier.

Conclusion

If you're curious about what AI says about your business, Fenn is worth a demo. Just be prepared to book a call—there's no self-serve option yet. For agencies, the multi-client dashboard and reports could be valuable, but the missing white-label reports and scheduled checks are limitations. Fenn has potential, but it's not yet a set-and-forget solution.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Fenn	Profound	Peec AI	Otterly.AI
AI platforms monitored	ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok	ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot	ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude	ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot
Pricing (starting)	$29/month	Custom (enterprise)	€49/month	$29/month
Self-serve signup	No (demo required)	Yes	Yes	Yes
Content fix suggestions	Yes, with approval workflow	Yes (recommendations)	No (monitoring only)	No (monitoring only)
Agency/multi-client support	Yes (up to 25 websites)	Yes (enterprise)	Yes (multi-project)	Yes (multi-project)