Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Flowmaps turns your app idea into a visual map of every feature, checks it for gaps, and writes build steps for Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or Claude Code.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 96/100, but mobile drops to 76 with a 6.8s LCP — the hero mockup and video assets are heavy on phones. CLS 0 and TBT 101ms keep it usable.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Flowmaps

About this app

Flowmaps is a visual app planner for anyone building with AI. Describe your idea and it becomes a mind map of every feature your app needs, with what to build first. It flags gaps like security, payments and privacy, then writes step-by-step build prompts for your AI builder.

Key features

1Describe an idea and get a mind map of every feature your app needs, with build-first ordering.
2Gap detection flags missing security, payments, privacy and onboarding before you prompt an AI builder.
3Generates step-by-step build prompts for Lovable, Bolt, Cursor and Claude Code.
4Free to start with 25 AI actions for the first 100 builders; bring your own Anthropic key after.
511 plain-language guides plus a free PRD template that works without an account.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Non-technical founders building their first app

Pain points

Unsure what features to include; AI builders misinterpret vague instructions; wasted credits on fixes

Primary needs

Clear, step-by-step guidance; feature suggestions; confidence that nothing is missing

Demographic

Experienced developers using AI coding assistants

Pain points

Managing complex projects; keeping track of build order; ensuring all requirements are covered

Primary needs

Structured plans; integration with tools like Cursor and Claude Code; visibility into progress

Demographic

Product managers or team leads overseeing AI-assisted development

Pain points

Coordinating multiple contributors; maintaining a shared understanding of the build plan

Primary needs

Collaboration features; shared boards; ability to assign and track tasks

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Flowmaps is a visual app planner that turns an idea into a mind map of features, flags gaps like security and payments, and writes step-by-step build prompts for Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or Claude Code. The product is well-positioned: it doesn't try to be the builder, it tries to be the plan the builder follows, which is a genuinely underserved slot. Execution is solid — polished landing page, fast onboarding, strong header security, a real guides library. The weak spots are a slow mobile LCP, three concrete accessibility fails, and a missing SPF record. For an early-stage product, this is a competent, clearly-positioned tool with a real wedge.

Measure by measure

Usability

Fast path to value: signup drops you into 'What's your business idea?' and a first map in ~2 minutes. Google + magic-link auth, 11 plain-language guides, free PRD template with no account.

Design

Polished, consistent SaaS landing page: strong hero hierarchy, realistic dark app mockups, disciplined blue accent. Held back by low-contrast testimonial thumbnails and uneven card rhythm.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse 96/100, but mobile drops to 76 with a 6.8s LCP — the hero mockup and video assets are heavy on phones. CLS 0 and TBT 101ms keep it usable.

Security

Strong header hygiene: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Referrer and Permissions policies all set (11/12 probe). Missing SPF; no SOC 2/ISO claim, but OAuth + magic-link auth limits credential risk.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 92/100 with three real fails: ARIA role children missing, contrast issues, and visible labels without matching accessible names. No WCAG statement published, but responsive and keyboard-navigable.

Growth

Real, specific wedge: a planning layer that feeds Lovable, Bolt, Cursor and Claude Code instead of competing with them. Named segments and a credit-saving pitch give it room; ceiling is how many builders adopt plan-first habits.

Improvement areas

Mobile LCP of 6.8s — heavy hero mockup and video assets slow the phone experience.
Three Lighthouse accessibility fails: ARIA role children, contrast ratios, accessible names.
Missing SPF record; no SOC 2 or ISO claim published for team buyers.
No WCAG conformance statement or dedicated accessibility page.

Design & Usability

Flowmaps' landing page is a competent, modern SaaS site: a bold hero with 'visually' in blue italic, realistic dark app mockups, and a clear problem→how-it-works→testimonials→examples flow. The visual audit flagged low-contrast testimonial thumbnails and uneven card text lengths, but nothing structural. Usability is where it shines: signup drops you straight into 'What's your business idea?' and a first map in about two minutes, Google and magic-link auth remove password friction, and the guides hub carries 11 plain-language articles plus a no-account PRD template. The one soft spot is the hero's secondary 'See an example map' link, which is buried next to a dominant Start free CTA.

Speed & Security

Speed is split down the middle: desktop Lighthouse 96/100 is genuinely fast, but mobile lands at 76 with a 6.8s LCP — the hero mockup and video assets are heavy on phones, which is exactly where the non-technical founder target lives. CLS 0 and TBT 101ms keep it from feeling broken. Security is a strong showing for an early-stage product: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy all present (11/12 on the header probe), with only SPF missing. Auth runs on Google OAuth and email magic-links, so there's no password database to leak. No SOC 2 or ISO claim is published, which is normal at this stage but worth watching as it moves upmarket.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 92/100 on Lighthouse but the three failing audits are the ones that matter: ARIA roles missing required children, insufficient color contrast, and visible text labels without matching accessible names. There's no WCAG statement or a11y page, though the site is responsive and keyboard-navigable. Growth is the more interesting story: Flowmaps deliberately doesn't compete with Lovable, Bolt or Cursor — it sits upstream as the planning layer that feeds them, and the pitch (stop burning credits on vague prompts) is specific and real. The named segments — first-time founders, AI-assisted devs, PMs coordinating builds — are concrete. The ceiling is behavioral: it wins only if builders adopt plan-first habits, and the $12-for-life early bird suggests the team knows it needs to seed that habit fast.

Conclusion

If you're a non-technical founder about to hand a vague prompt to Lovable and watch your credits evaporate, Flowmaps is worth the two minutes it takes to try. The plan-first workflow is the right idea and the execution backs it up. Watch the mobile load time and the accessibility gaps as it grows, and expect the security story to need a SOC 2 conversation once teams start using it. For now: a strong early-stage product with a clear reason to exist.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the three Lighthouse a11y fails: ARIA role children, contrast ratios, and accessible names on labeled controls.
Compress the hero mockup and video assets to bring mobile LCP down from 6.8s toward 2.5s.
Add an SPF record to complete the email authentication stack alongside the existing DMARC.
Promote 'See an example map' to a real secondary CTA in the hero — it's the fastest proof of value.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Flowmaps	Lovable	Bolt	Cursor
Visual feature mapping / planning board	Yes — core product: idea becomes a mind map of features with build order	No — generates code directly from prompts	No — builds apps from descriptions without structured planning	No — code editor, no visual planning layer
Gap detection (security, payments, privacy)	Yes — flags missing security, payments, privacy and onboarding	No — relies on the user's prompt to cover these	No — no built-in gap analysis	No — editor-level assistance only
Step-by-step build prompts for AI builders	Yes — writes scoped prompts for Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Claude Code	Consumes prompts; does not generate structured plans	Consumes prompts; no plan generation	Consumes prompts; no plan generation
Generates working code / app	No — plans and prompts only, hands off to a builder	Yes — full app generation from prompts	Yes — full app generation in browser	Yes — AI-assisted coding in an editor
Free tier / entry price	Free to start; Pro $12/mo early bird for first 100 customers	Free tier with limited credits; paid plans for more	Free tier with token limits; paid plans	Free tier; Pro subscription for full features