Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Blockchain risk intelligence for wallet screening, investigations, fund tracing, and API integrations.

Security

HTTPS enforced with X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy, but no HSTS, CSP, frame protection, or DMARC. No SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty published. 5/12 checklist points.

Screenshots

1 / 4

OnChainRisk

About this app

OnChainRisk is a blockchain risk intelligence platform for wallet screening, crypto investigations, and developer integrations. It helps users assess wallets and transactions using explainable risk signals, on-chain activity, fund-flow context, counterparty analysis, and sanctions-related checks where supported. Investigators and compliance teams can use the web interface for manual analysis, while developers can integrate risk and investigation data through the REST API. OnChainRisk also provides investigation reports, transaction evidence, tracing tools, and developer documentation. Coverage and feature depth vary by network and use case. The platform is designed to make practical blockchain intelligence accessible without requiring an enterprise software contract.

Key features

1Wallet risk scoring and AML/sanctions screening across 23 blockchain networks including ETH, BTC, Tron, Solana, TON, and Cosmos.
2Fund-flow analysis with 6 visualization modes (force-directed, hierarchical, Sankey, timeline, tree, 3D) and WebGL for 1000+ nodes.
3REST API for programmatic risk scoring, bulk analysis, and auto chain detection, with PDF/CSV/XLSX/Markdown report exports.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Crypto Investigators

Pain points

Limited tools for tracing stolen funds across multiple chains; expensive enterprise solutions.

Primary needs

Affordable, multi-chain forensics with fund-flow analysis and pattern detection.

Demographic

Compliance Officers

Pain points

Manual AML screening is time-consuming; need for automated risk scoring and sanctions checks.

Primary needs

Automated AML/sanctions screening, risk scoring, and exportable reports.

Demographic

DeFi Users

Pain points

Risk of interacting with honeypots or scam tokens; lack of security checks before trading.

Primary needs

Token security checks, honeypot detection, and contract intelligence.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

OnChainRisk is a blockchain risk intelligence platform that does wallet screening, fund-flow tracing, and AML/sanctions checks across 23 networks, with a dashboard for manual investigations and a REST API for developers. It's aimed at crypto investigators, compliance officers, and DeFi users who need forensics without an enterprise contract. The product's strongest card is speed — a 96/100 mobile Lighthouse score and 100/100 desktop — and its most credible design element is the terminal demo showing real risk output rather than placeholder text. The dashboard and report views are dense but functional, with stable navigation and clear triage signals. Where it falls short: security hardening is thin (5/12 header checklist points, no SOC 2 or bug bounty), accessibility has three basic Lighthouse failures despite a 93 score, and the homepage hero wastes its most valuable real estate on empty black space. Growth potential is genuine but bounded — the Tron/TON wedge is smart, but 'cheaper than Chainalysis' isn't a moat. For indie investigators and small compliance teams, it's a practical option. For enterprises needing audit trails and certifications, it's not there yet.

Measure by measure

Usability

Dashboard plus REST API with PDF/CSV exports and auto chain detection. Sidebar navigation is stable, but the address field lacks paste affordance and recent-search chips overflow with raw hex.

Design

Dark-mode forensics UI with consistent cyan/orange accents and monospace data. Terminal demo and fund-flow graphs look credible, but homepage hero wastes space and report views feel cramped.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 96/100 (LCP 2.6s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms) and desktop 100/100. Genuinely fast, lightweight site with no reported lag complaints.

Security

HTTPS enforced with X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy, but no HSTS, CSP, frame protection, or DMARC. No SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty published. 5/12 checklist points.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 93/100, but fails on color contrast, heading order, and missing main landmark. No accessibility statement or WCAG mention. Multi-chain coverage is strong; multi-language UI is not evident.

Growth

Real problem, specific wedge: affordable multi-chain forensics with Tron/TON depth where Chainalysis and Arkham are thin. No-enterprise-contract pricing and USDT payment lower the barrier.

Improvement areas

Security hardening: add HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and DMARC; publish SOC 2 roadmap or bug bounty program.
Accessibility: fix color contrast, heading order, and missing main landmark; add an accessibility statement.
Homepage design: fill the empty hero space with a live demo or trust signals; reduce report-view density.
Usability: add example addresses and paste affordance to wallet input; truncate recent-search hex chips.

Design & Usability

OnChainRisk presents a dark-mode forensics interface with consistent cyan/orange accents and monospace data elements that signal 'serious tool' rather than 'crypto casino.' The terminal demo in the hero convincingly shows real risk output — an address labeled Tornado Cash: Router with a 55/100 risk score — which builds trust faster than any stock screenshot. The fund-flow graph uses color-coded directional edges and hoverable nodes for quick tracing. Where it stumbles: the homepage top is almost entirely empty black space below the nav, giving a sparse, unfinished first impression. The report view packs Risk Flags, Transaction Timing, and Activity Campaigns into dense cards with minimal breathing room. Recent searches render as long untruncated hex strings that overflow their chips. Usability is competent: a stable sidebar (Reports, Usage, Wallets, API Keys) aids orientation, and the dashboard's metric cards and 'New TX' alerts support quick triage. But the address input auto-detects network without offering example addresses or a paste affordance, and the two stacked CTAs — a prominent teal API button above a low-weight 'Check a wallet' — split attention rather than guiding it.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout. Lighthouse mobile performance scores 96/100 with LCP 2.6s, CLS 0, TBT 0ms, and FCP 1.5s; desktop hits a perfect 100/100. The site is lightweight and snappy, with no user complaints about lag in the available evidence. For a platform handling on-chain data and WebGL fund-flow graphs, that's a strong foundation. Security is where the picture dims. HTTPS is enforced and X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy are present, but there's no HSTS, no CSP, no frame protection, and no DMARC — just 5 of 12 checklist points. For a product that positions itself as a forensics and AML tool, the absence of a published SOC 2, ISO certification, or bug bounty program is notable. The site advertises 'crypto-native, no KYC' payment via USDT, which is a deliberate trade-off but also means no enterprise compliance paperwork to point to. Nothing here is broken — TLS works, headers aren't absent — but for a security-adjacent product, the hardening is thin.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 93/100 on Lighthouse, which sounds strong until you read the failing audits: insufficient color contrast, non-sequential heading order, and a missing main landmark. Those are table-stakes fixes, and their presence suggests automated checks passed while manual review didn't happen. There's no accessibility statement or WCAG mention on the site, and while multi-chain coverage spans 23 networks, there's no evidence of multi-language UI support. Growth potential is the most interesting dimension. OnChainRisk names a real problem — affordable multi-chain forensics — and picks a specific wedge: Tron and TON depth where Chainalysis and Arkham are thin, with the site explicitly claiming 'Go where Chainalysis and Arkham can't.' The target customers are specific (investigators, compliance officers, DeFi users), and the no-enterprise-contract pricing plus USDT payment lowers the barrier for exactly the users the incumbents price out. The honest limit: 'cheaper than Chainalysis' is a pricing strategy, not a moat. If the incumbents decide the Tron/TON segment is worth serving, they have the resources to do it. The wedge is real but defensible mainly by speed and focus, not by structural advantage.

Conclusion

OnChainRisk lands in a familiar spot for indie forensics tools: genuinely useful, fast, and priced for the people the incumbents ignore, but thin on the compliance and accessibility polish that enterprise buyers demand. The 23-network coverage and Tron/TON depth are real differentiators, and the API-first design with predictable pricing is a sensible bet. If you're an investigator tracing stolen funds across chains, or a small compliance team that can't justify a Chainalysis contract, this is worth a look — the terminal demo alone tells you the team understands the work. If you need SOC 2, published audits, or a vendor with a bug bounty, keep looking. The product is competent and the positioning is sharp; the next 12 months will show whether 'no enterprise contract' becomes a real category or just a discount.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a security page with SOC 2 roadmap, bug bounty, and header hardening (HSTS, CSP, frame protection, DMARC).
Fix the three Lighthouse a11y failures: color contrast, heading order, and add a main landmark. Add an accessibility statement.
Fill the homepage hero's empty black space with a live demo, sample report, or trust signals instead of void.
Add example addresses and a paste-from-clipboard affordance to the wallet input; truncate recent-search hex chips.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	OnChainRisk	Chainalysis	Elliptic	TRM Labs	Arkham	Nansen
Pricing model	No enterprise contract; USDT payment, crypto-native, no KYC	Enterprise contracts, custom pricing	Enterprise contracts, custom pricing	Enterprise contracts, custom pricing	Freemium with paid tiers	Subscription tiers, free limited plan
Multi-chain coverage	23 networks including Tron, TON, Cosmos, Cardano, XRP	Major chains; Tron/TON coverage limited	Major chains; Tron/TON coverage limited	Major chains; Tron/TON coverage limited	Major chains; Tron/TON coverage limited	Major chains; Tron/TON coverage limited
Developer API	REST API with predictable pricing, auto chain detection, bulk analysis	API available on enterprise plans	API available on enterprise plans	API available on enterprise plans	Limited public API	API available on paid plans
Compliance certifications	None published (no SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty found)	SOC 2, ISO certifications	SOC 2, ISO certifications	SOC 2, ISO certifications	Not publicly detailed	Not publicly detailed
Target customer	Indie investigators, small compliance teams, DeFi users	Government, financial institutions, enterprises	Crypto businesses, financial institutions	Enterprises, government, financial institutions	Traders, researchers, investigators	Traders, investors, DeFi analysts