Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Save Your App is an AI-powered website and web app diagnostic platform that identifies conversion, UX, messaging, SEO, performance, accessibility, trust, and onboarding issues - then shows users what to fix first.

Growth

Real problem (blocked conversion), specific wedge (7-layer scan + bundled human tester), but crowded category and no segment it clearly owns. Domain is 0.1 years old.

Screenshots

1 / 3

Save Your App

About this app

Save Your App helps founders, developers, SaaS teams, and business owners understand why their website or web app may not be converting visitors into users or customers. Users enter their URL and run an automated scan that looks for potential issues across conversion, user experience, messaging, SEO, performance, accessibility, trust, and onboarding. Paid plans provide deeper AI-powered analysis, prioritized recommendations, actionable fixes, organized dashboard tasks, recurring scans, and real human beta testing. The goal is to make it clear what may be wrong, what matters most, and what should be fixed first.

Key features

17-layer automated scan covering SEO, performance, UX, conversion, accessibility, trust, and onboarding
2AI-powered diagnosis with ranked fixes and ready-to-paste fix prompts on paid plans
3Monthly human beta tester bundled into every paid plan, with 3-day tests on the Founder tier

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Save Your App is a conversion-audit tool that scans a URL across seven layers — SEO, performance, UX, conversion, accessibility, trust, and onboarding — and returns a ranked fix list, with paid plans adding AI analysis and a monthly human beta tester. The pitch is aimed at founders and SaaS teams who've shipped something and can't figure out why signups aren't happening. The site is well-designed, fast (Lighthouse 91 mobile / 96 desktop), and technically secure (12/12 on the header probe). The free tier is genuinely free — three scans, no card. Where it falls short: no visible proof of what the dashboard or reports actually look like, no security or compliance documentation, no accessibility statement despite auditing accessibility for others, and a growth story that's differentiated on features but not on segment. It's a competent, well-built product in a crowded category that needs to show its work more clearly.

Measure by measure

Usability

Free scan with no card and a 3-minute promise keeps friction low. Paid tiers bundle human testers, but onboarding flow and docs depth aren't visible from the collected content.

Design

Dark, editorial 'case file' aesthetic with act-based storytelling and consistent pricing cards. Copy is stylized but the visual system holds together and feels intentional.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 91/100 and desktop 96/100 are strong, but mobile LCP of 3.2s sits above the 2.5s 'good' threshold — the headline number hides a slower first paint.

Security

Full header suite (HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy) plus SPF/DMARC — 12/12 on the probe. No SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty published.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 89/100 with contrast failures and malformed list markup. No WCAG statement or a11y page found — solid automated baseline, gaps in the details.

Growth

Real problem (blocked conversion), specific wedge (7-layer scan + bundled human tester), but crowded category and no segment it clearly owns. Domain is 0.1 years old.

Improvement areas

No sample scan report or dashboard preview on the site — buyers can't see the output before paying
No security, privacy, or data-handling page despite ingesting customer URLs and tester access
Accessibility gaps: contrast failures and malformed list markup on a site that audits accessibility

Design & Usability

Save Your App leans hard into a 'case file' editorial aesthetic — dark palette, act-based sections, all-caps headlines that read like a crime drama cold open. It's a deliberate choice and it mostly works: the pricing page is clean, the three tiers are legible, and the copy has a voice instead of the usual SaaS mush. Usability is where the polish starts to thin. The free tier is genuinely low-friction — three automated scans, no card, a promised three-minute turnaround — and bundling a human beta tester into every paid plan is a real differentiator on paper. But the collected site content doesn't show what happens after you paste a URL: no visible dashboard tour, no docs, no sample report. For a product whose entire value is 'we tell you what's wrong,' the site is oddly quiet about what its own output looks like. The onboarding promise is strong; the proof of it is missing.

Speed & Security

Speed is the strongest measured dimension here. Lighthouse mobile performance lands at 91/100 with a 96/100 on desktop, FCP at 951ms, CLS at 0.062, and TBT at 135ms — all comfortably in healthy territory. The one soft spot is mobile LCP at 3.2s, above Google's 2.5s 'good' threshold, which means the first meaningful paint is slower than the overall score suggests. For a marketing site with heavy editorial sections, that's a fixable image/font issue rather than a structural problem. Security is clean on the technical side: HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy all present, plus SPF and DMARC configured — a full 12/12 on the header probe. What's absent is the trust layer: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no published pen-test, no bug bounty, no security page. For a tool that asks users to paste their URL and (on paid plans) hands their product to human testers, some statement about how that data is handled would be the obvious next step.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 89/100 on Lighthouse, which is a solid automated baseline, but the failing audits are telling: insufficient color contrast and list items not wrapped in proper <ul>/<ol> parents. The contrast issue is ironic for a product that audits other sites' accessibility as one of its seven layers — if you're going to sell a11y checks, your own site should pass them. There's also no accessibility statement or WCAG conformance claim anywhere in the collected content, which is a gap for a tool positioning itself as a quality auditor. Growth is a judgement call on the idea rather than the traction. The problem Save Your App names is real and painful — founders ship, traffic arrives, nobody signs up, and they don't know which of a dozen things is broken. The wedge is specific: seven audit layers plus a bundled human beta tester every month, which is more than most automated-only competitors offer. But the category is crowded with free Chrome extensions, $0 SEO tools, and established UX audit services, and the site doesn't name a segment it serves better than any of them. The domain is 0.1 years old and social profiles exist but show no visible traction. The idea can grow; the positioning needs a sharper edge.

Conclusion

The bones here are good. The site loads fast, the security headers are complete, the free tier is actually free, and the human-tester add-on is a real differentiator that most automated-only competitors can't match. What's missing is proof. A product that sells 'we'll show you what's broken' should show you what its own output looks like — a sample report, a dashboard screenshot, a before/after. Right now the landing page is all promise and no receipt. Fix the mobile LCP, add an accessibility statement (and fix the contrast failures), publish something about data handling for a tool that ingests customer URLs, and put a real scan result on the homepage. The idea is sound; the evidence needs to catch up to the copy.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a sample scan report or dashboard screenshot on the homepage so visitors can see the actual output before signing up.
Fix the mobile LCP (3.2s) by optimizing hero images and font loading — the rest of the performance profile is already strong.
Add an accessibility statement and fix the contrast and list-markup failures flagged by Lighthouse — you audit a11y, so pass it.
Publish a security/data-handling page explaining how submitted URLs and tester access are managed, even without formal certifications.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Save Your App
Pricing model	Free tier (3 scans); Solo $49/mo; Founder $129/mo	Not specified in provided data
Human testing included	Yes — monthly beta tester on all paid plans; extra 3-day tests $199	Not specified in provided data
Audit layers covered	7 layers: SEO, performance, UX, conversion, accessibility, trust, onboarding	Not specified in provided data
AI-powered analysis	Yes on paid plans — ranked fixes with ready-to-paste fix prompts	Not specified in provided data
Free entry point	Yes — 3 automated scans, no card required	Not specified in provided data