Usability68Design71Speed88Security74Accessibility79Growth64

Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Free open-source WordPress plugin for sitemaps, AI-readable content and content audits.

Growth

64

Real, current problem (AI can't read your WordPress site) with a concrete wedge — llms.txt, Markdown, MCP and branded reports that Rank Math, Yoast and AIOSEO don't ship. Early stage, but the idea has room.

Screenshots

1 / 1

About this app

CYBERMAPS is a free WordPress plugin that publishes XML and HTML sitemaps, Markdown and llms.txt-style outputs, and branded content-audit reports. It is GPL-2.0 licensed, requires WordPress 7.1+ and PHP 8.2+, and is currently in open beta. Created by Aleksandr Oreshkin, credited to CYBER BRAND.

Key features

  • 1XML, News, RSS and HTML sitemaps with ownership controls and Core-sitemap replacement.
  • 2AI publishing: llms.txt, Markdown, feeds, discovery manifests and MCP adapter for read-only agent access.
  • 3Content intelligence reports with saved measurements, action lists, branded printable HTML and CSV/JSON export.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

WordPress site owners and bloggers

Pain points

Content not discovered by search crawlers; AI tools misread the site

Primary needs

Clear sitemaps and readable content for search and AI

Demographic

SEO agencies and freelance consultants

Pain points

Hard to prove content improvements; fragmented client reporting

Primary needs

Branded reports, saved comparisons, exportable action lists

Demographic

Small business owners with WordPress sites

Pain points

Scattered business details; AI assistants can't find key info

Primary needs

Structured business identity and AI-readable publications

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

CYBERMAPS is a free, GPL-2.0 WordPress plugin that publishes XML/HTML sitemaps, Markdown and llms.txt-style AI outputs, and branded content-audit reports for agencies. The marketing site is fast (Lighthouse mobile 100/100) and visually coherent, backed by a field guide that goes deeper than most paid plugins. Security headers are mostly present but CSP and DMARC are missing and there are no compliance certifications. Accessibility scores 100/100 on automated checks but the site's own micro-copy undercuts it. The differentiator against Rank Math, Yoast and AIOSEO is real: none of them ship AI-readable publications or client-ready audit reports. It's early — half-year-old domain, WordPress.org listing pending — but the positioning is sharper than the category average.

Measure by measure

Usability

68

Clear five-item nav, free offer stated in the hero, and a genuinely deep field guide with install, verification, MCP and REST/WP-CLI docs. The homepage itself is a long scroll to reach comparison and reports.

Design

71

Cohesive navy-and-cyan system with condensed display type and real plugin screenshots as proof. Undermined by micro-copy that's too small and low-contrast, and a 14-thumb strip nobody can read.

Speed

88

Lighthouse mobile 100/100 with LCP 944ms, CLS 0 and TBT 62ms; desktop 96/100. A near-static marketing page that loads before you finish blinking.

Security

74

HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy; SPF present. Missing CSP and DMARC, and no SOC 2/pen-test claims — normal for a free GPL plugin.

Accessibility

79

Lighthouse accessibility 100/100, light/dark toggle, and Markdown-readable docs. No published WCAG statement or multi-language evidence, and the tiny low-contrast captions undercut the automated score.

Growth

64

Real, current problem (AI can't read your WordPress site) with a concrete wedge — llms.txt, Markdown, MCP and branded reports that Rank Math, Yoast and AIOSEO don't ship. Early stage, but the idea has room.

Improvement areas

  • Missing CSP and DMARC headers; no published security audit, pen-test or bug-bounty program.
  • No WCAG conformance statement; hero and thumbnail micro-copy fails practical contrast despite 100/100 axe score.
  • Homepage is long and dense — comparison and reports paths buried far below the fold.
  • WordPress.org listing still 'awaiting approval'; distribution depends entirely on the marketing site.

Design & Usability

The homepage is a genuinely well-built piece of marketing: a navy-and-cyan system, condensed display headlines, monospace eyebrows and real WordPress admin screenshots instead of stock imagery. The Then/Now/Next timeline and the Discovery-gaps before/after do the explaining through structure rather than adjectives. Where it slips is scale — hero annotations, timeline captions and the 14-thumbnail strip are set so small and low-contrast that the detail work is wasted. Usability is stronger than the scroll suggests: a five-item nav, the free offer stated in the hero, and a field guide that covers install, sitemap ownership, verification, MCP, REST and WP-CLI. The cost is length; comparison and reports sit far down a dense page.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout measured result: Lighthouse mobile 100/100 with LCP 944ms, CLS 0 and TBT 62ms, desktop 96/100. The marketing site is effectively static and snappy, and nothing in the collected evidence suggests lag. Security is solid but unremarkable for a free GPL plugin: HTTPS enforced with HSTS, frame protection, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy, plus SPF. It's missing CSP and DMARC, and there's no SOC 2, ISO, pen-test or bug-bounty claim anywhere on the site. The docs do include a troubleshooting-and-security section and privacy controls for crawler analytics, which is more than most free plugins bother with.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores 100/100 on the Lighthouse axe-core audit, and the site adds a light/dark toggle and Markdown-readable docs — thoughtful touches. But automated checks only cover part of WCAG, and the tiny low-contrast monospace captions visible in the hero and thumbnail strip are exactly the kind of thing axe misses. No WCAG conformance statement or multi-language evidence was found. Growth is the more interesting question: the problem CYBERMAPS names — WordPress content that crawlers miss and AI assistants misread — is real and current, and the wedge (llms.txt, Markdown publications, MCP adapter, branded client audit reports) is something Rank Math, Yoast and AIOSEO genuinely don't ship. The domain is roughly half a year old and the WordPress.org listing is still awaiting approval, so traction is context, not the score. The idea has room; execution and distribution are the open questions.

Conclusion

If you run a WordPress site and care whether ChatGPT or Gemini can actually read it, CYBERMAPS is worth installing today — it's free, it's fast, and the docs are unusually honest about what the plugin does and doesn't touch. If you're an agency, the branded reports and saved comparisons are the part to test first. The gaps to watch are the missing CSP/DMARC, the absence of any published security audit, and the fact that the WordPress.org listing is still pending — until that clears, distribution depends entirely on the site itself. None of those are dealbreakers for a beta; all of them are the things to check again in six months.

Suggestions for improvement

  • Publish a WCAG conformance statement and bump the hero annotation and thumbnail-label type sizes — the automated 100/100 hides a real contrast problem.
  • Add CSP and DMARC to close the two missing security headers, and publish a short security/threat-model page for a plugin that touches crawler data.
  • Shorten the homepage scroll: surface 'Compare the plugin' and 'Explore reports' higher, or add a sticky section index.
  • Ship the WordPress.org listing and add a one-click demo or sandbox so visitors can see the reports before installing.
How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

CYBERMAPSRank MathYoast SEOAIOSEO
XML / HTML sitemapsYes — XML, News, RSS and HTML sitemaps with ownership controlsYes — XML sitemaps includedYes — XML sitemaps includedYes — XML sitemaps included
AI-readable publications (llms.txt / Markdown)Yes — llms.txt, Markdown, feeds and discovery manifestsNo dedicated AI publishingNo dedicated AI publishingNo dedicated AI publishing
MCP / agent accessYes — WordPress MCP Adapter with read-only connectionsNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
Branded client audit reportsYes — saved comparisons, branded printable HTML, CSV/JSON exportLimited — no branded audit reportsLimited — no branded audit reportsLimited — no branded audit reports
Pricing modelFree, GPL-2.0-or-later, no subscriptionFreemium — paid Pro tiersFreemium — paid Premium tiersFreemium — paid Pro tiers
Schema / structured identityYes — factual identity and service catalogsYes — rich schema supportYes — schema blocksYes — schema support

Comparing options? See CYBERMAPS alternatives, scored side by side

View all SEO Tools
Scout Forge

A platform dedicated to providing unbiased reviews of newly launched applications, analyzing everything from their features to their full potential.

info@scoutforge.net

© 2026 Scoutforge. All rights reserved.

CYBERMAPS Review | Scout Forge