Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Ghosts drafts SEO/AEO-optimized law firm marketing and website content, with attorney-advertising rules built into the writing process.

Growth

Extremely new product (domain June 2026). Minimal traction signals beyond founder mentions and social links; no reviews, community, or independent coverage yet.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Ghosts

About this app

Ghosts is an AI content engine for law firms and the SEO agencies that serve them. It provides high-quality humanized content creation with a multi-agent writing system. The content engine has built-in content regulatory compliance that runs through the content drafting pipeline. It allows law firms and SEO agencies to scale and automate content creation, including review approvals and content gap identification. Ghosts researches competitive market data to ensure content is drafted with trust and authority signals, giving it the best chance to rank in search engine and AI answer results.

Key features

1State-specific attorney advertising rule enforcement during drafting (FL, TX, NY, Federal).
2Mandatory reviewer sign-off gate with version-bound approvals and unlimited free reviewer seats.
3Multi-agent pipeline that researches, fact-checks, and applies disclaimers before human review.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Law firm marketing managers

Pain points

Spending too much time reviewing generic AI content against state advertising rules; risk of non-compliance; slow publishing process.

Primary needs

A tool that drafts compliant content from the start and automates the review workflow.

Demographic

Law firm partners or managing partners

Pain points

Liability from published content violating attorney-advertising rules; difficulty tracking approvals; no audit trail.

Primary needs

A system that enforces sign-off, records approvals, and blocks non-compliant content.

Demographic

Agencies serving law firms

Pain points

Managing multiple jurisdictional rule sets; rework after client review; inefficiency in content production.

Primary needs

A platform that applies state-specific rules and simplifies the review loop.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Ghosts carves out a narrow but meaningful niche by baking attorney-advertising rules and mandatory reviewer sign-off into the AI drafting pipeline. The product is purpose-built for US law firms in a handful of states and the agencies that serve them, differentiating sharply from generic writers like Jasper or Copy.ai. Execution is competent for a one-month-old tool, with solid usability hooks and transparent pricing, though design polish, mobile speed, and third-party security proof all have headroom.

Measure by measure

Usability

Strong workflow clarity with free trial, unlimited reviewers, and state-specific rule flagging. Free language checker lowers the barrier; navigation is standard but login link blends in.

Design

Clean but sparse landing page with consistent orange branding and a distinctive logo mark. Hero feels empty and the product demo screenshot lacks fidelity or real workflow depth.

Speed

Solid desktop Lighthouse score of 98 but mobile at 78 with 4.4s LCP. Marketing site loads reasonably; no performance complaints or benchmarks available.

Security

Basic HTTPS + encryption claims and data isolation stated on site. Weak header posture (no CSP/HSTS) and zero third-party compliance attestations found.

Accessibility

Perfect 100/100 Lighthouse score. Responsive design observed but no explicit WCAG statement, multi-language support, or keyboard navigation documentation.

Growth

Extremely new product (domain June 2026). Minimal traction signals beyond founder mentions and social links; no reviews, community, or independent coverage yet.

Improvement areas

Higher-fidelity product demos and mobile performance optimization.
Third-party security/compliance attestations and stronger HTTP security headers.
Visible traction signals: user reviews, changelog, and community channels.

Design & Usability

Ghosts presents a focused, law-firm-specific value proposition with clear branding and a transparent workflow. The orange accent creates instant recognition, and the three-step process (draft → review → publish) is explained without fluff. Usability benefits from the free language checker and unlimited reviewer seats, which directly address the pain points of compliance and approval bottlenecks. The site itself is simple to navigate, though the hero could use tighter copy and a higher-fidelity demo to convert faster.

Speed & Security

Performance is respectable for a marketing site, with excellent desktop scores but room to improve mobile LCP. Security relies on standard encryption claims and tenant isolation without independent verification or strong headers. For a tool handling sensitive legal content, the absence of published audits is noticeable but typical for a product this early in its lifecycle. Data never trains models is a strong stated policy.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility passes automated checks cleanly and the interface appears responsive. Growth is the weakest area: the product launched in late June 2026 with almost no external validation yet. Early signals include social profiles and a founder profile in niche AI coverage, but real user adoption, reviews, and community metrics are still absent. This is expected for a brand-new vertical SaaS but limits credibility signals.

Conclusion

If you're a Florida, Texas, or New York firm tired of generic AI copy that still needs heavy legal review, Ghosts is worth a 7-day test drive. Just don't expect a mature platform with battle-tested compliance certifications yet.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a higher-fidelity interactive demo or sample output gallery to the hero.
Publish a basic security page with any available attestations or pen-test summary.
Implement a public changelog and early-adopter community channel to build visible momentum.
Optimize mobile LCP below 3 seconds for better on-the-go reviewer experience.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Ghosts	Jasper AI	Copy.ai	WordPress with plugins
Attorney-advertising rule enforcement	Built-in state-specific rules (FL/TX/NY/Federal) applied during drafting with citations	None; generic AI without legal advertising rules	None; generic AI without legal advertising rules	None; manual checking required
Reviewer sign-off workflow	Mandatory gate; approvals bound to exact text; unlimited free reviewer seats	None; no built-in approval gates	None; no built-in approval gates	Manual via plugins or external tools
Content compliance & audit trail	Recorded approvals, version history, rule citations on every piece	None; no compliance tracking	None; no compliance tracking	Basic revision history only; no rule citations