Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Find what's broken on your website in about two minutes

Security

HTTPS and HSTS are in place with SPF and DMARC configured, but the header checklist is 6/12 — no CSP, no frame protection, no Referrer-Policy. No SOC 2, pen-test, or security page published, which is normal at this stage.

Screenshots

1 / 1

QAlaunch

About this app

Most website problems aren't visible to the person who built the site. It looks right on your laptop, then a real visitor opens it on a phone and the nav overlaps the logo, the contact form silently fails, or a button goes nowhere. You never find out — you just see traffic and no signups. QAlaunch loads your site in a real browser and checks it the way a tester would: mobile layout across five viewports, broken links, form and button behaviour, accessibility and page speed, plus an AI pass over the actual screenshots for visual problems a checklist can't catch. The free scan takes about two minutes and needs no signup, no email and no card. Full reports, with a screenshot pinpointing every issue, start at $9 one-time — no subscription. Built by a QA engineer with 9 years of professional testing experience.

Key features

1Free 120-second website scan with no signup, email, or credit card required
2Full PDF audit report from $9 one-time covering 35+ checks across usability, UI, functionality, mobile, performance, and SEO
3AI screenshot analysis to catch visual bugs a checklist can't — contrast, alignment, broken images, invisible CTAs

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

QAlaunch is a focused, well-priced QA audit tool aimed at a real and growing problem: AI-generated and no-code sites that look fine on the builder's laptop and break on a real visitor's phone. The free scan requires no signup, the preview surfaces three critical issues in about two minutes, and the full PDF report starts at $9 one-time — a price point that removes almost all friction for solo founders and small agencies. The landing page is polished and the mock audit dashboard does a good job of showing what you get. The weak spots are honest and fixable: mobile performance is slow (4.7s LCP) for a product that sells speed audits, security headers are half-configured with no published compliance story, and the site itself fails three accessibility checks while selling accessibility checks as a feature. None of these are dealbreakers at this stage, but they're the kind of details that a QA-focused audience will notice first.

Measure by measure

Usability

No-signup free scan is the right call for this audience, and the 120s preview to $9 one-time PDF is a clean funnel. Pricing page answers the obvious questions (what's a page, refunds, dev handoff) without a sales call.

Design

Dark, modern SaaS landing with a convincing mock audit dashboard and clear severity-coded issue cards. Dense but on-brand; the product itself is a PDF report, so design is judged from the marketing site and sample output.

Speed

Desktop Lighthouse is a clean 100/100, but mobile lands at 74 with a 4.7s LCP — nearly double Google's 'good' threshold. For a product whose pitch is 'your site is too slow,' the irony writes itself.

Security

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y score of 91/100 is solid, but three real failures remain: prohibited ARIA attributes, insufficient color contrast, and non-sequential heading order. No accessibility statement or WCAG claim published.

Growth

Real, specific wedge: AI-assisted QA for non-technical builders (Lovable, no-code, solo founders) at a $9 one-time price. The 'AI-built sites have broken buttons' angle is timely and the no-signup free scan is a smart top-of-funnel.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: 4.7s LCP is nearly double Google's 'good' threshold on a site that sells speed audits
Security headers: only 6/12 configured, with no CSP, frame protection, or Referrer-Policy
Accessibility: three Lighthouse failures (contrast, ARIA, heading order) on a site that sells accessibility checks

Design & Usability

QAlaunch's landing page is a competent, modern SaaS site with a dark palette, a mock audit dashboard, and severity-coded issue cards that make the product legible in about five seconds. The design is dense — hero, problem stats, a ten-item feature grid, a three-step flow, testimonials, and pricing all stacked on one scroll — but it's on-brand for a QA tool that wants to look thorough. Usability is where the product actually shines: the free scan needs no signup, no email, and no card, which is exactly right for a suspicious founder who's been burned by 'free trial' funnels before. The 120-second preview surfaces three critical issues, and the $9 one-time PDF report is a genuinely low-friction upsell. The pricing page answers the questions that matter (what counts as a page, can I send this to my dev, do you refund) without forcing a sales call. The main usability drag is the four-tier pricing structure — Basic, Standard, Premium, Enterprise — which is a lot of decision architecture for a product whose entry point is nine dollars.

Speed & Security

Speed is the most awkward dimension for a product whose entire pitch is 'your site is too slow.' Desktop Lighthouse is a flawless 100/100, but mobile lands at 74 with a 4.7-second LCP — nearly double Google's 2.5s 'good' threshold — and a 3.0s FCP. CLS is a clean 0 and TBT is a reasonable 109ms, so the page isn't janky, it's just heavy on mobile. For a tool that sells Core Web Vitals audits, that's a credibility tax. Security is mid-tier: HTTPS is enforced with HSTS, SPF and DMARC are configured, but the HTTP header checklist comes in at 6/12 — no Content-Security-Policy, no frame protection, no X-Content-Type-Options, no Referrer-Policy, no Permissions-Policy. There's no SOC 2, ISO, pen-test report, or bug bounty published, which is normal for a product this young but does mean buyers are trusting the maker's word on data handling. The site does collect URLs and presumably screenshots, so a short security page explaining retention would go a long way.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility lands at a respectable 91/100 on Lighthouse, but the three failing audits are the kind that matter: prohibited ARIA attributes, insufficient color contrast, and non-sequential heading order. For a product that lists 'Accessibility Checks' as a paid feature, shipping a site that fails contrast is an own-goal — not fatal, but the kind of thing a sharp prospect will screenshot. There's no accessibility statement, no WCAG conformance claim, and no multi-language support. Growth is the more interesting story. The wedge is specific and timely: AI-generated sites from Lovable, v0, and similar tools ship fast and break quietly, and the founders building them are exactly the audience that won't run a manual QA pass. A $9 one-time audit with no subscription is a smart price point for that buyer, and the no-signup free scan is a genuinely good top-of-funnel. The domain is only about half a year old, so this is very early — the question isn't whether the idea can grow, it's whether one-time $9 audits can compound into a business or stay a side project.

Conclusion

The pitch is sharp and the audience is real. AI-built sites are shipping broken buttons and invisible CTAs at scale, and the people building them are not going to run a manual QA pass — they'll pay nine bucks for someone else to. That's a good business to be in. What QAlaunch needs now is to practice what it preaches: get the mobile LCP under 2.5 seconds, finish the security headers, fix the contrast and heading-order issues on its own site, and publish a short page on how URLs and screenshots are stored and deleted. A QA tool that passes its own audit is a much easier sell than one that doesn't. The foundation is solid — the next move is closing the gap between the product's promise and the product's own report card.

Suggestions for improvement

Fix the 4.7s mobile LCP — it's the single most damaging number on a site that sells speed audits. Compress hero assets and defer non-critical JS.
Complete the HTTP security headers: add CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy.
Fix the three Lighthouse a11y failures (contrast, ARIA, heading order) — you sell accessibility checks, so your own site should pass them.
Publish a short security/privacy page explaining how submitted URLs and screenshots are stored, retained, and deleted.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	QAlaunch
Pricing model	One-time: $9 Basic (1 page), $24 Standard (2-5), $59 Premium (6-10), Enterprise custom. No subscription.	-
Free tier / trial	Free 120-second scan surfacing 3 critical issues, no signup, email, or card required.	-
Core checks covered	35+ checks: usability, UI/visual bugs, functionality (forms/buttons/links), mobile responsiveness across 5 viewports, Core Web Vitals, SEO fundamentals, accessibility.	-
AI screenshot analysis	Yes — AI pass over real screenshots to catch visual problems checklists miss (contrast, alignment, broken images).	-
Deliverable format	PDF report with screenshot evidence and step-by-step developer fix instructions, delivered by email and download.	-