Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Reputation monitoring across Google, AI search engines, reviews, news and social media, with sentiment analysis per mention.

Usability

Clear CTAs and straightforward pricing with free trial. Try-yourself input lacks example hint; navigation is compact but language selector is low-contrast. Overall easy to understand value proposition.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Reptor

About this app

Reptor is a reputation monitoring platform from Amsterdam. It shows how a company, brand or person appears in Google, in AI search engines such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Copilot, and in reviews, news media and social media. What sets Reptor apart is that it does not stop at counting mentions. Every mention is scored for sentiment and relevance, so it becomes clear what is actually being said rather than how much has been written. For AI search it records not only whether you are named, but in what context and alongside whom. Reptor has existed since 2025 and comes out of MediaMaze, active in online reputation management since 2012. It is built for organisations that want to know what is being said about them before someone else tells them. Essential from EUR 129 per month, Professional from EUR 299 per month, with a seven-day free trial and monthly cancellation.

Key features

1AI search monitoring across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and more
2Sentiment and relevance scoring for every mention across 31 channels
3Google SERP, autocomplete, Wikipedia, Telegram, and podcast monitoring
4Automated executive reports and PDF exports
5Multi-entity and multi-country monitoring on higher tiers

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Marketing and brand managers

Pain points

No single overview of what is said about the brand across channels

Primary needs

Alerts, sentiment and relevance scoring, and one dashboard

Demographic

PR and communications professionals

Pain points

Coverage is noticed too late to respond well

Primary needs

Daily monitoring of news, social media and reviews

Demographic

Founders and directors

Pain points

No insight into how the company appears in AI answers

Primary needs

Position tracking in AI search and Google over time

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Reptor is a well-executed reputation monitoring platform that stands out with its AI search coverage and sentiment scoring. The landing page is polished and informative, performance is excellent, and accessibility is above average. Security is solid but could be more transparent. Growth potential is real, given the increasing importance of AI search visibility, but the young company faces stiff competition. Overall, a strong product with clear value for marketing and PR teams, though it needs to build more trust and traction to fully realize its potential.

Measure by measure

Usability

Design

Polished, modern landing page with concrete dashboard mockup and clear feature cards. Slight inconsistencies in card layout and a redundant maker image hold it back from excellent.

Speed

Excellent performance scores (mobile 89, desktop 100) with fast LCP and zero layout shift. No user complaints found. Solid, though not blazing-fast on mobile due to LCP 3.5s.

Security

Strong baseline: HTTPS, HSTS, frame protection, and DMARC all present. Missing CSP and no public SOC 2/ISO claims. No incidents found. Solid for a young SaaS.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 96/100 with only contrast issues. Skip link present, keyboard navigable. No explicit WCAG statement or multi-language support beyond NL/EN. Good but not perfect.

Growth

AI search monitoring is a real, growing need with few dedicated tools. Clear differentiators (AI platforms, Wikipedia, Telegram) and specific target segments. Headroom exists, but competition from broader media monitoring tools is a risk.

Improvement areas

Add CSP header to improve security posture
Publish SOC 2/ISO compliance details to build enterprise trust
Fix contrast issue flagged by Lighthouse and add explicit WCAG statement
Improve try-yourself input with example placeholder and clearer guidance
Differentiate maker media image from hero to add new visual information

Design & Usability

Reptor's landing page is a masterclass in clarity: a concrete dashboard mockup, feature cards with real data, and a comparison table that makes its broader coverage obvious. The design is modern and polished, though minor inconsistencies in card heights and a redundant maker image keep it from being top-tier. Usability is strong with clear CTAs and a straightforward pricing page, but the try-yourself input lacks an example hint, and the language selector is low-contrast. Overall, it's easy to understand what Reptor does and why it's different, which is more than many competitors achieve.

Speed & Security

Performance is excellent: desktop scores 100/100 and mobile 89/100 with fast LCP and zero layout shift. The site feels snappy, and no user complaints about lag were found. Security is solid for a young SaaS: HTTPS, HSTS, frame protection, and DMARC are all in place, though CSP is missing and there's no public SOC 2/ISO claim. For a platform that monitors reputations, it's reassuring to see a strong baseline, but there's room to publish more compliance details to build trust with enterprise buyers.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is a clear strength with a 96/100 Lighthouse score, though the contrast failure and lack of a WCAG statement are minor blemishes. Growth potential is promising: Reptor targets a real, growing need—AI search visibility—with specific differentiators like Wikipedia and Telegram monitoring. The category has headroom, but competition from broader media monitoring tools like Mention and ReviewTrackers is a threat. If Reptor can establish itself as the go-to for AI reputation, it could carve out a solid niche, but it needs to scale beyond its current 145+ companies to prove staying power.

Conclusion

If you're a brand manager tired of being blindsided by what ChatGPT says about you, Reptor is worth a trial. It's not perfect—the contrast issue and lack of SOC 2 might give enterprise buyers pause—but the core value proposition is compelling. With a 7-day free trial and monthly cancellation, there's little risk in trying it. As AI search grows, tools like Reptor will become essential; the question is whether it can scale fast enough to lead the pack. For now, it's a solid choice for those who want to stay ahead of the AI reputation curve.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a placeholder example like 'Acme Corp' to the try-yourself input to guide users.
Publish a security page with SOC 2/ISO status and a clear privacy policy to build enterprise trust.
Fix the contrast issue flagged by Lighthouse and add an explicit WCAG statement.
Differentiate the maker media image from the hero to add new visual information.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Reptor	Mention	ReviewTrackers
AI search engine monitoring	Yes, monitors ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and more	No, focuses on web and social media mentions	No, focuses on review management
Sentiment analysis with AI	Yes, AI-powered sentiment scoring on every mention	Yes, basic sentiment analysis available	Yes, sentiment analysis on reviews
Wikipedia edit monitoring	Yes, tracks edits and changes	No, not a dedicated feature	No, not a dedicated feature
Telegram monitoring	Yes, monitors public channels and groups	No, not a dedicated feature	No, not a dedicated feature
Autocomplete tracking	Yes, tracks Google autocomplete suggestions	No, not a dedicated feature	No, not a dedicated feature
Google SERP monitoring	Yes, daily checks across keywords and brand terms	Yes, basic SERP monitoring	No, focuses on reviews
Review aggregation	Yes, aggregates reviews from Google, Trustpilot, Glassdoor	Yes, includes review monitoring	Yes, core feature
Social media monitoring	Yes, monitors X, TikTok, Reddit, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Telegram, Bluesky	Yes, core feature	Limited, focuses on reviews
Podcast monitoring	Yes, monitors podcast mentions with timestamps	No, not a dedicated feature	No, not a dedicated feature
Executive reports (automated PDF)	Yes, automated weekly/monthly PDF reports	Yes, report export available	Yes, report generation available
People monitoring	Yes, monitor personal names and executives	Yes, can monitor personal names	No, focuses on business reviews
Multi-country and language support	Yes, on Enterprise plan	Yes, global coverage	Limited, primarily English