Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Most WordPress sites have posts that no other post links to. Readers and Google find posts by following links, so those posts get missed.

Growth

A real, specific problem (unlinked WordPress posts) with a concrete wedge — it finds the sentence that already mentions the post and writes the link with undo. Clear segment and per-site pricing, but the category is crowded.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Silotree

About this app

Most WordPress sites have posts that no other post links to. Readers and Google find posts by following links, so those posts get missed. Silotree reads every post on your site and finds the ones with no link in from another article. For each one, it finds a sentence in your other posts that already mentions it and suggests the words to link. You see the sentence, the link text and where it leads, then approve the ones you like.

Key features

1Free no-account audit that scores your site and lists posts with no inbound article link.
2Suggests the existing sentence and anchor text for each unlinked post, with approve/reject.
3Writes approved links into WordPress with a saved revision, verification and one-click undo.
4Search Console integration to compare linked vs unlinked posts' clicks over time.
5Broad page-builder and SEO plugin support (Gutenberg, Elementor, Divi, Bricks, Yoast, Rank Math).

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Silotree is a focused WordPress internal-linking tool that does one job well: find posts with no inbound article link, find the sentence in another post that already mentions them, and suggest the anchor text for you to approve. The free no-account audit is the right onboarding, the pricing is legible, and the technical execution is strong — 98/100 mobile Lighthouse, a full security-header set, and a write path with revisions and undo. The weaknesses are the crowded category and the missing compliance/accessibility documentation, not the core product. For a WordPress publisher or a small agency with a backlog of orphaned posts, it's a sensible, honest tool that doesn't oversell its impact.

Measure by measure

Usability

Free audit with no account is the right call — value before signup. Four clear tiers, a no-card 14-day trial, and long-form guides instead of a bare help center. Broad editor/page-builder integration coverage.

Design

Polished, modern marketing site with a clear headline, a live example widget and a tight step-by-step flow. The plugin/app UI is the real product and is only glimpsed via screenshots, but the site craft is well above indie-SEO-tool average.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 98/100 (LCP 1.3s, CLS 0, TBT 46ms) and desktop 100/100. The marketing site is genuinely fast; no lag complaints surfaced in collected evidence.

Security

Full security-header set (HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Referrer/Permissions-Policy), SPF and DMARC, 12/12 probe points. Writes use a scoped Application Password with revisions and undo. No published audit or SOC 2 claim found.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 100/100 on automated checks, and the demo is framed as needing no sound. No explicit WCAG statement or a11y page found, and the app UI itself wasn't audited — automated checks only cover part of WCAG.

Growth

Improvement areas

No published security/compliance documentation (SOC 2, ISO, pen-test) despite a strong header posture.
No accessibility statement or WCAG conformance claim; app UI not independently audited.
Pricing matrix (four tiers plus per-site selector) adds friction to a single-job product.
In-WordPress plugin UI is under-shown on the marketing site relative to its importance.

Design & Usability

Silotree's site is a cut above the usual indie SEO tool: a clear headline, a live example widget showing a real site's score, and a numbered how-it-works that actually explains the loop. The product itself is a WordPress plugin plus web app, so the marketing site is doing most of the design work here — the in-WordPress UI is only visible through screenshots. Usability is the stronger story: a free audit with no account gets you to value before signup, the pricing page is unusually legible (four tiers, per-site counts, a no-card 14-day trial), and the integration list covers Gutenberg, Elementor, Divi, Bricks, Yoast, Rank Math and WPML/Polylang. Long-form guides stand in for a help center. The friction is the pricing matrix — a per-site selector and four tiers for what is fundamentally one job.

Speed & Security

Speed is the standout measured result: Lighthouse mobile 98/100 with LCP 1.3s, CLS 0 and TBT 46ms, and a perfect 100 on desktop. The site is light and snappy, and no lag complaints surfaced. Security is solid on the technical side — the HTTP probe found HTTPS enforced, HSTS, CSP, frame protection, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy, SPF and DMARC, 12/12 checklist points. The product's own write path is thoughtfully scoped: it saves a WordPress revision first, uses an Application Password for the user's own account, checks each link landed, and offers one-click undo. What's missing is the compliance layer — no SOC 2, ISO or pen-test claim appears in the fetched content, so the score sits in the upper-middle of the band rather than at the top.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores well on the automated side: Lighthouse 100/100, and the demo is explicitly framed as needing no sound. That's a good baseline, but automated checks cover only part of WCAG — there's no published accessibility statement, and the app UI itself wasn't audited, so treat 80 as 'clean automated pass' rather than 'verified accessible'. Growth is the more interesting question. The problem is real and specific: posts no other post links to, backed by an in-house study of 170 sites and 5,190 posts finding 56% of posts had no inbound article link. The wedge is concrete — it finds the sentence that already mentions the post and suggests the anchor text, then writes it with undo — which is sharper than a generic SEO suite. The limit is the category: internal-linking and SEO plugins are crowded, and the ceiling is a WordPress tool, not a platform. A competent, clearly positioned product with a real differentiator and a modest ceiling.

Conclusion

If you run a WordPress site with more than a handful of posts, the free audit costs you nothing but a URL and will tell you something real about your site. The paid tiers are reasonable for what they do, and the undo-first write path means the downside of trying it is small. It won't transform your traffic overnight — the site says as much — but it fixes a genuine, measurable gap that most SEO tools ignore. Start with the free score, approve a batch, and see if the links earn clicks before you pay.

Suggestions for improvement

Publish a short accessibility statement and confirm keyboard support through the approve-links flow.
Add a security/compliance page — even 'no SOC 2 yet, here's our data handling' builds trust.
Simplify the pricing selector; four tiers plus a per-site matrix is more friction than the job needs.
Show the in-WordPress plugin UI more prominently — it's the product and it's currently only in screenshots.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Silotree
Finds posts with no inbound internal links	Yes — core feature, free audit	Not specified in provided details
Suggests anchor text from existing sentences	Yes — shows the sentence, link text and destination	Not specified in provided details
Writes links into WordPress with undo	Yes — revision saved, verified, one-click undo	Not specified in provided details
Free tier / no-account audit	Yes — free audit and score, no account	Not specified in provided details
Search Console click comparison	Yes — compares linked vs unlinked posts weekly	Not specified in provided details