Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Personal AI workspace that learns your standards and prod...

Speed

Mobile performance is poor (LCP 9.3s) due to heavy hero images; desktop is decent (87/100). CLS is perfect, but mobile users will bounce before the page loads.

Screenshots

1 / 1

Rivus

About this app

Rivus is a personal AI workspace built around how you work. Generic AI gives everyone the same answer, so you spend your day pasting context, re-explaining yourself, and rewriting output that sounds like no one. Rivus keeps your context in plain files you own, works your task from more than one angle, and produces with you on a living document instead of a chat. It learns from your actual work, so it gets sharper every time you use it.

Key features

1Persistent context stored in plain files on your machine, eliminating the need to re-explain.
2Multi-angle reasoning: Rivus works from several perspectives (financial, devil's advocate) and reshapes its output.
3Document-centric workflow: produce on a living document with comments, not a chat thread.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Consultants and analysts

Pain points

Repetitive context-setting, generic output, time wasted on re-explaining

Primary needs

Efficiency, personalized insights, maintaining unique voice

Demographic

Founders and startup teams

Pain points

Generic AI suggestions, lack of institutional memory, decision fatigue

Primary needs

Scalable thinking, privacy, alignment with company standards

Demographic

Writers and content creators

Pain points

Losing personal style, starting from scratch, editing generic drafts

Primary needs

Authentic voice, workflow integration, ownership of work

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

Rivus is an ambitious early-stage product aiming to solve a genuine problem: generic AI output due to lack of persistent context. Its document-centric, multi-angle approach is a refreshing take. The landing page is polished, but performance and security need work. The waitlist model may hinder adoption, but the idea has merit. If executed well, it could carve a niche among consultants and writers.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear three-pane model communicated effectively, minimal navigation. However, no live demo or trial—only waitlist—limits hands-on evaluation. Small text in dark sections may hurt readability.

Design

Polished, modern landing page with strong brand cohesion and realistic product mockups. Dense dark sections and heavy shadows slightly reduce polish, but overall impression is good.

Speed

Mobile performance is poor (LCP 9.3s) due to heavy hero images; desktop is decent (87/100). CLS is perfect, but mobile users will bounce before the page loads.

Security

HTTPS enforced, but missing HSTS, CSP, frame protection, and Permissions-Policy. No security certifications or privacy policy found. Basic security hygiene is present, but not comprehensive.

Accessibility

Lighthouse accessibility 91/100, but fails on color contrast and form labels. No accessibility statement or multi-language support. Keyboard navigation likely works but not verified.

Growth

Clear differentiator: persistent context in plain files, multi-angle reasoning, document-centric workflow. Targets specific segments with real pain. Early-stage but idea has room.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: LCP 9.3s needs optimization; consider image compression and lazy loading.
Security: Add HSTS, CSP, and frame protection; publish a privacy policy and consider SOC 2.
Accessibility: Fix color contrast and form labels; add an accessibility statement and multi-language support.

Design & Usability

Rivus presents a compelling vision: a personal AI workspace that learns from your work and produces on a living document. The landing page effectively communicates this with a realistic three-pane mockup and strong brand cohesion. Usability is decent, but the waitlist-only approach limits hands-on evaluation. The three-pane model is intuitive, but small text in dark sections and lack of a live demo are drawbacks.

Speed & Security

Performance is a mixed bag: desktop loads well, but mobile suffers with a 9.3s LCP, likely due to heavy hero images. Security is basic—HTTPS enforced, but missing HSTS, CSP, and frame protection. No security certifications or privacy policy found, which is concerning for a product handling user context. Speed and security need attention before launch.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is decent (91/100 Lighthouse) but fails on contrast and form labels. No accessibility statement or multi-language support. Growth potential is real: the product targets specific pain points (generic AI output, lack of context) with a clear differentiator (plain files, multi-angle reasoning). However, it competes with giants like ChatGPT and Claude, so the wedge must be compelling enough to switch.

Conclusion

Rivus has a strong concept and a clear target audience. To succeed, it must deliver on its promise of personalized, context-aware AI. Improving mobile performance, adding security certifications, and offering a live demo would boost credibility. The waitlist is a good start, but opening access sooner could build momentum. Watch this space—it might just be the anti-generic AI tool we need.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a live demo or interactive walkthrough to let users experience the three-pane workflow without signing up.
Improve mobile performance by optimizing hero images and implementing lazy loading.
Publish a privacy policy and security page detailing data handling and encryption.
Add an accessibility statement and fix contrast/label issues to reach WCAG compliance.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	Rivus	ChatGPT	Claude	Notion AI
Context persistence	Stores context in plain files on your machine, persists across sessions.	No persistent context; each chat starts fresh unless using custom instructions.	No persistent context; conversations are separate, no learning from past work.	Context within Notion pages, but requires manual setup and doesn't learn from decisions.
Workflow integration	Document-centric with comments, multi-angle reasoning, and live surface.	Chat-based, no document editing or collaborative surface.	Chat-based, no dedicated workspace for documents.	Integrated into Notion docs, but AI is an add-on, not a core workflow.
Personalization	Learns from your work, standards, and decisions over time.	Limited personalization; custom instructions can be set, but no learning from usage.	No personalization; responses are generic without setup.	Requires manual setup; doesn't learn from your decisions deeply.