Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

Turn any web page into LLM-ready JSON or Markdown. XCrawl scrapes, crawls, maps and searches the web for AI builders.

Security

HTTP probe found HTTPS not enforced, zero of 13 security headers, no SPF/DMARC, and no SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty signals. For an API handling customer keys and scraped data, the hygiene is thin.

Screenshots

1 / 1

XCrawl

About this app

XCrawl gives developers one API for getting web data into AI apps. Scrape a single URL into Markdown, JSON, HTML or a screenshot; crawl a whole site with depth and scope rules; map every URL on a domain; or pull structured results from Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and other engines. Rendering, proxy rotation and retries run on XCrawl side. SDKs for Python and Node.js, a CLI, an MCP server and an n8n node are available, and new accounts start with 1,000 free credits.

Key features

1Scrape API returning clean JSON, Markdown, HTML, or headless screenshots from any URL
2Crawl and Map APIs with depth/scope control and full-domain URL discovery
3SERP API pulling structured results from Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo
4MCP server, n8n node, Python/Node SDKs, and CLI for AI and automation workflows
51,000 free credits on signup with no credit card required

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

AI/ML engineers and data scientists

Pain points

Need clean, structured data for LLM training and RAG pipelines; struggle with messy HTML and anti-bot measures

Primary needs

Reliable, AI-ready data extraction with JSON/Markdown output; high success rate on protected sites

Demographic

Growth hackers and SEO professionals

Pain points

Manual SERP tracking and competitor monitoring is time-consuming; proxies and CAPTCHAs block automation

Primary needs

Automated SERP data, competitor scraping, and price monitoring with built-in proxy rotation

Demographic

Full-stack developers and automation engineers

Pain points

Maintaining custom scrapers is costly; integrating web data into workflows is complex

Primary needs

Easy-to-use API with SDKs, no-code integrations (n8n, Zapier), and scalable infrastructure

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

XCrawl is a competent, developer-first web scraping API with a polished landing page, a clear AI-ready pitch (Markdown/JSON/screenshots), and sensible integrations in MCP and n8n. The 1,000-credit free tier and no-credit-card signup are the right hooks. Where it stumbles is infrastructure hygiene: zero security headers, HTTPS not enforced, no compliance signals, and a 6-second mobile LCP. Against ScrapingBee, Bright Data, and Apify it is neither the cheapest nor the most entrenched — its bet is that AI-native output and agent integrations are the wedge. That's a plausible thesis, but the execution on security and speed needs to catch up to the marketing.

Measure by measure

Usability

Code snippet with language tabs, 1,000 free credits, no credit card, and documented MCP/n8n integrations make the developer path clear. No visible login state or site search, and docs depth is unverified.

Design

Clean, developer-first landing page with consistent teal accents, clear hierarchy, and a live code snippet. Feature cards feel light and CTAs repeat a bit, but overall craft is above average for the category.

Speed

Lighthouse mobile 65/100 with a 6.0s LCP drags the score; desktop is a healthier 81/100 and CLS is near-perfect at 0.004. TBT 381ms shows some main-thread work. Fine, not fast.

Security

HTTP probe found HTTPS not enforced, zero of 13 security headers, no SPF/DMARC, and no SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty signals. For an API handling customer keys and scraped data, the hygiene is thin.

Accessibility

Lighthouse a11y 92/100 with only contrast and unnamed-link failures. No WCAG statement or a11y page found, but the automated baseline is solid and the site is responsive.

Growth

Real, growing need — AI pipelines need clean web data — and MCP/n8n/SDK breadth is a genuine wedge. But scraping APIs are crowded (ScrapingBee, Bright Data, Apify) and differentiation is thin.

Improvement areas

Security hygiene: enforce HTTPS, add HSTS/CSP/frame protection, publish SPF and DMARC
Mobile performance: 6.0s LCP and 381ms TBT need real optimization
Compliance transparency: no SOC 2, ISO, or security page for an API handling keys
Accessibility polish: fix color contrast and unnamed links; publish a WCAG statement

Design & Usability

XCrawl's landing page is genuinely well-built for its audience: a bold headline, three checkmark bullets, a live URL input with mode pills, and a syntax-highlighted Python snippet with tab switching. The teal accent is consistent and the hierarchy is clear. Usability leans hard on the developer: 1,000 free credits, no credit card, and documented MCP and n8n integrations lower the barrier to a first request. Weaknesses are minor but real — no visible login state, no site search, repeated CTAs, and feature cards that feel visually light. The bigger unknown is docs depth, which the homepage links to but doesn't demonstrate. For a developer tool, the first five minutes look smooth; the next fifty are unverified.

Speed & Security

Speed is a mixed bag. Desktop Lighthouse lands at 81/100, but mobile drops to 65/100 with a 6.0s LCP and 381ms TBT — sluggish for a marketing page, though CLS at 0.004 is excellent. No user complaints about API latency surfaced in the evidence, so the product's runtime speed is unmeasured. Security is the weak flank: the HTTP probe found HTTPS not enforced, zero of thirteen security headers, no SPF or DMARC, and no SOC 2, ISO, or bug bounty signals anywhere on the site. For a service that ingests customer API keys and scrapes third-party sites, that's a thin posture. Neither dimension is broken, but neither inspires confidence for a production integration.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility scores well on automated checks — Lighthouse 92/100 — with only two failures: insufficient color contrast and links without discernible names. There's no WCAG statement or accessibility page, so the commitment beyond the audit is unclear, but the responsive baseline is solid. Growth is the more interesting question. The problem XCrawl names is real and expanding: AI apps and RAG pipelines need clean, structured web data, and the MCP server plus n8n node are a sensible wedge for the agent era. But the category is crowded — ScrapingBee, Bright Data, and Apify all sit in the same lane with deeper proxy networks or marketplaces. XCrawl's differentiator is breadth of AI-native outputs and integrations, not a structural moat. It can grow; it will have to fight for every point of share.

Conclusion

If you're prototyping an AI pipeline and want clean Markdown out of a URL in one call, XCrawl is a reasonable first stop — the free credits make the trial cost nothing but time. Before you put it in production, ask hard questions about key handling, HTTPS enforcement, and whether the 99%+ success-rate claim holds on your targets. The product is early (domain registered late 2025) and the security posture reflects that. Watch the docs and the compliance page; if those mature, the AI-native angle could earn it a real seat at the table.

Suggestions for improvement

Enforce HTTPS and ship the standard security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy) — 0/13 is a red flag for an API product.
Publish SPF and DMARC records and add a security page with key-handling and data-retention details.
Cut the mobile LCP from 6.0s — optimize hero images, fonts, and third-party scripts to get under 2.5s.
Add a visible login/dashboard link and a docs search so returning developers aren't hunting the nav.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	XCrawl	ScrapingBee	Bright Data	Apify
AI-ready output formats (Markdown/JSON for LLMs)	Yes — Markdown, JSON, HTML, screenshots	Partial — HTML/JSON, less AI-focused	Yes — structured datasets, enterprise focus	Yes — via actors and dataset schemas
MCP server / AI agent integration	Yes — native MCP server	Not advertised	Emerging AI/agent tooling	Yes — MCP actors available
Free tier / trial	1,000 free credits, no card	1,000 free API credits	Free trial credits, card often required	$5 free monthly usage
Proxy network scale	Auto-rotating residential proxies (scale unverified)	Large rotating proxy pool	Industry-leading proxy network	Proxy pools via platform
No-code automation integrations	n8n node, MCP server	Zapier, Make integrations	Broad no-code and enterprise connectors	Extensive actor marketplace + integrations
Published security/compliance certifications	None found; 0/13 security headers	GDPR-focused, security page	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR	SOC 2, GDPR compliance