Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

AI writer that fact-checks before writing, with real sour...

Speed

Desktop performance is perfect (100/100), but mobile is slower with LCP at 4.9s. CLS is 0, which is great. No user complaints found.

Screenshots

1 / 4

ContentIQ

About this app

ContentIQ is an AI content platform designed for founders, marketers, and agencies who publish under their own name and simply cannot afford to be wrong. Most AI writers generate a draft first and leave the tedious fact-checking to you. ContentIQ flips this workflow entirely. Before it writes a single line, it retrieves real web sources, tests every claim against them, and discards any data that fails. The AI only writes using verified facts. The final result reads in your exact brand voice, argues a clear point, and includes clickable source citations. This ensures a hallucinated statistic never makes it into your draft. Set up your brand profile once to keep your positioning and tone consistent across SEO articles, LinkedIn posts, white papers, and newsletters. Key Features: - Fact verification before generation - Brand-aware writing trained on your voice - Clickable source citations on claims - Built-in editor and fast export First article free at https://app.contentiq.net/

Key features

1Fact verification before generation, discarding unsupported claims.
2Brand-aware writing with a persistent brand profile for consistent voice.
3Clickable source citations on every claim, with a sources panel.
4Five content formats (post, blog, case study, white paper) with length targets.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

Founders and solo marketers

Pain points

Limited time, pressure to publish authoritative content, fear of publishing inaccurate statements under their own name, lack of writing resources.

Primary needs

Efficient content creation, factual accuracy, brand voice consistency, time-saving tool.

Demographic

Agencies managing multiple client brands

Pain points

Switching between brand voices, manual fact-checking, providing credible sources to clients, streamlining editorial workflows.

Primary needs

Multi-brand support, consistent voice, verifiable sources, scalability, efficiency.

Demographic

Marketing teams for expert audiences (e.g., engineers, clinicians, analysts)

Pain points

Generic AI content easily spotted by experts, risk of losing credibility with a single wrong figure, lack of depth and original argument in generated content.

Primary needs

Factual integrity, deep subject matter fidelity, expert-level writing, evidence-based claims.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

ContentIQ is a promising AI writing tool that flips the script by verifying facts before generating content. Its design is clean, usability is intuitive, and the core differentiator is compelling. Performance is strong on desktop but needs mobile optimization. Security is solid but could be enhanced with CSP. Accessibility is excellent. The main challenge is competing with established players, but the unique value proposition gives it a real shot.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear three-step onboarding and benefit-focused copy. Primary CTA is prominent but competes with a secondary button of similar weight. Live demo is compelling but requires scrolling.

Design

Clean, professional SaaS design with a strong hero and a fact-checking demo that visualizes the core value. Consistent cards but repetitive across sections; small low-contrast citations hurt readability.

Speed

Desktop performance is perfect (100/100), but mobile is slower with LCP at 4.9s. CLS is 0, which is great. No user complaints found.

Security

Strong baseline security: HTTPS, HSTS, frame protection, and DMARC all present. Missing CSP is a gap. No SOC 2 or ISO certification found, but not expected at this stage.

Accessibility

Excellent Lighthouse accessibility score (98/100) with only a missing main landmark. No explicit WCAG statement, but the site is keyboard-navigable and has good contrast. English-only.

Growth

Clear differentiator: fact-checking before generation, source citations, brand profiles. Targets underserved segments with a real pain point. Early-stage, but the idea has room to grow.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance needs optimization (LCP 4.9s).
Add Content Security Policy (CSP) header.
Improve citation readability (font size and contrast).
Publish an accessibility statement and fix missing main landmark.

Design & Usability

ContentIQ presents a polished, professional interface that clearly communicates its core value proposition: fact-checked AI writing. The hero and fact-validation demo are effective, though the design becomes repetitive across sections. Usability is strong with a clear three-step onboarding, but the competing CTAs and the need to scroll for the demo could be streamlined. Overall, a well-crafted experience that prioritizes clarity and trust.

Speed & Security

Performance is excellent on desktop (100/100) but lags on mobile (75/100) with a 4.9s LCP, which could be improved. Security is solid with HTTPS, HSTS, and DMARC, but the lack of CSP is a notable gap. No SOC 2 or ISO certifications are published, which is typical for a young product but worth watching as they grow.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is a strong point, with a 98/100 Lighthouse score and only a minor landmark issue. The site is keyboard-navigable and has good contrast, though no formal WCAG statement exists. Growth potential is significant: the fact-checking differentiator addresses a real pain point for founders and agencies, and the brand profile feature adds stickiness. However, the market is competitive, and they must prove reliability to win over users from established tools.

Conclusion

If you're a founder or marketer who's tired of AI hallucinating stats under your name, ContentIQ is worth a try. The free first article is a low-risk way to test it. Just be prepared to wait a bit longer on mobile, and keep an eye on their security roadmap. It's a fresh take on AI writing that might just earn your trust.

Suggestions for improvement

Improve mobile LCP by optimizing images and leveraging lazy loading.
Add a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to enhance security.
Increase citation font size and contrast for better readability.
Publish an accessibility statement and fix the missing main landmark.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	ContentIQ	Jasper AI	Copy.ai
Fact-checking before generation	Yes, retrieves sources, tests claims, discards failures.	No, generates draft first, user must fact-check.	No, focuses on speed, no rigorous fact validation.
Source citations on claims	Yes, clickable citations with sources panel.	No, no built-in source citations.	No, no source citations.
Brand voice consistency	Yes, persistent brand profile with voice rules.	Yes, brand voice feature, but less structured.	Limited, no dedicated brand profile.
Pricing model	$39/month (Single Brand), $99/month (Studio).	Starts at $39/month (Creator plan).	Free tier, Pro at $49/month.