Cycling through all six. Tap any point to stop.

Measured on six things

The world's largest film-still library for inspiration, learning, and making movies faster.

Security

HTTPS, HSTS, and email auth are solid, but missing key security headers and no visible compliance certifications. Standard for early-stage SaaS.

Screenshots

1 / 1

FrameThrower

About this app

Explore the world's largest library of film stills for inspiration, learning, and making movies faster. FrameThrower indexes every frame of thousands of films by lighting, lens character, shot size, colour grade, time of day, and who is in the shot. Search in natural language, save references to lookbooks, and export them as PDFs or ZIPs. Built for filmmakers, cinematographers, advertising creatives, and students. For developers, FrameThrower offers eleven REST endpoints, an MCP server for Claude and ChatGPT, an npm SDK, and a ComfyUI node that brings film references and depth maps into creative workflows. Built by senior filmmakers and advertising creatives.

Key features

1Search film stills by lighting, lens, shot size, color grade, time of day, and people.
2Natural language search and lookbook builder with PDF/ZIP export.
3Developer tools: REST API, MCP server, npm SDK, and ComfyUI node.

Target customer profile

Drawn from the product itself, not from a survey.

Demographic

AI Developers and Creative Technologists

Pain points

Need high-quality visual data and APIs to integrate into their creative algorithms.

Primary needs

REST API, MCP server, npm SDK, and ComfyUI integration for cinematographic reference.

Scout Review

Written by AI from measured evidence, scored out of 100.

FrameThrower is a promising tool for filmmakers and AI creatives, offering a searchable library of film stills with unique metadata and developer integrations. The design is on-brand but has rough edges, and mobile speed needs work. Security is basic but not alarming. The free tier and clear pricing make it easy to try. Growth is constrained by competition and niche appeal, but the API angle could carve out a dedicated user base. Overall, a competent product with room to polish.

Measure by measure

Usability

Clear search filters and prominent CTA; pricing is transparent with a free tier. Onboarding is straightforward, but no live demo or extensive docs visible.

Design

Cinematic black theme fits the film niche; hero collage is noisy and homepage has dead space, but product UI is clean and scannable.

Speed

Mobile performance is weak (LCP 7.7s) but desktop is solid (88/100). Heavy imagery likely causes the gap; no user complaints found.

Security

HTTPS, HSTS, and email auth are solid, but missing key security headers and no visible compliance certifications. Standard for early-stage SaaS.

Accessibility

Lighthouse 88/100 with specific fixes needed: ARIA misuse, contrast, heading order, touch targets. No a11y statement, but core functionality is keyboard-navigable.

Growth

Real problem with a clear wedge: searchable film metadata and API integrations. But free alternatives like FilmGrab and limited market size cap growth.

Improvement areas

Mobile performance: reduce LCP from 7.7s to under 3s.
Accessibility: fix ARIA misuse, contrast, heading order, and touch targets.
Security: add CSP and other missing headers, publish compliance info.

Design & Usability

FrameThrower's design is a mixed bag: the deep-black cinematic theme is on-brand, but the homepage wastes space with empty black voids and a noisy hero collage. The product UI, however, is clean and functional, with a search grid that's easy to scan. Usability is strong with clear filters and a transparent pricing page, but the lack of a live demo or extensive docs leaves some questions. The free tier is a good entry point, and the Pro trial is well-communicated.

Speed & Security

Speed is a tale of two devices: desktop performance is solid at 88/100, but mobile suffers with a 7.7s LCP, likely due to heavy imagery. Security is standard for an early-stage SaaS: HTTPS and HSTS are in place, but missing headers like CSP and no visible compliance certifications are a concern for enterprise users. The API's metered pricing is clear, but security documentation is thin.

Accessibility & Growth

Accessibility is decent at 88/100 but has specific issues: ARIA misuse, contrast, heading order, and touch targets. No a11y statement is a miss. Growth potential is real: the problem of finding film references is genuine, and the API/MCP/ComfyUI integrations are a differentiator. However, free alternatives like FilmGrab and a niche audience limit the ceiling. The idea is solid but not explosive.

Conclusion

If you're a filmmaker tired of scrolling through static galleries, FrameThrower's search and lookbook features are worth a shot. The free tier lets you test the waters, and the API is a nice bonus for the tech-savvy. Just don't expect it to replace your entire previs workflow yet. With some speed and accessibility fixes, it could become a staple in the creative toolkit.

Suggestions for improvement

Add a live demo or interactive tutorial to showcase search and lookbook features without signup.
Improve mobile performance by optimizing images and lazy-loading to reduce LCP.
Publish a security page detailing data handling, encryption, and any compliance efforts.
Fix accessibility issues: remove prohibited ARIA, ensure heading order, and increase touch target sizes.

How we score

Alternatives comparison

Named competitors, point by point. Nobody paid to appear here or to be left out.

	FrameThrower	FilmGrab
Searchable metadata	Indexes every frame by lighting, lens, shot size, color grade, time of day, and people; natural language search.	Static collection of film stills, no metadata search.
Developer integrations	REST API, MCP server, npm SDK, ComfyUI node.	None.
Pricing	Free tier with limits; Pro $14/mo; Studio $345/yr; API metered.	Free to browse.
Lookbook builder	Create moodboards, share links, export PDF/ZIP.	No such feature.